NY TIMES FEATURES 3 PAGE ONE STORIES ON PALIN'S TEEN DAUGHTER IN TUESDAY EDITIONS...
I guess Dems are not very tolerant of teenage single mothers.
So all you single mothers out there, the Dems think you are a disgrace, you are an embarrassment and should be looked down upon.
That is what they think when the chips are down. When they want your vote they will throw money at you and tell you how courageous you are...how strong you are.
So be on the lookout for the phony Dem outrage
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Now the media bias really kicks in
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
11 comments:
another bogus attack by you. reporting what is is not bias. these stories are not about the daughter. they are about:
Palin Disclosures Raise Questions on Vetting (how thoroughly did sidney's campaign vett palin?)
A New Twist in the Debate on Mothers (being a politician/public official and a mother at the same time)
In Political Realm, ‘Family Problem’ Emerges as Test (how the country and the party will react to the fact that a socially conservative, abstinence-only politician has a pregnant 17-year old daughter.)
none of these stories are attacks. none makes any judgment upon the daughter. none looks down upon the daughter. all are on legitimate subjects of interest.
your claims of bias are bogus.
that's ridiculous, game, this story is HUGE here, anything about the palins is, simply because they are so unconventional
don't fall into the trap of automatically lumping mainstream democrats and traditional, establishment news outlets with obongo's worldview or fundamental values, as it were
What a country. Where a pregnant 17 YO daughter of a Republican veep candidate is the top story for three days yet a democrat presidential candidate with known ties to organized crime and unrepentant terrorist bombers goes unreported.
Where voting "present" dozens of times is more experience than governing a state for two years.
The left's kimono is wide open...
TN
How about the media excusing John Edwards infidelity now screaming about Sara Palin's 17 YO daughters Pregnancy.
No bias here...
TN
We all know that the media will never look into all the sleezy crap Obama did with all the dirty Chicago politicians and admitted home grown terrorists...
But that was a very good point bringing up Edwards...
It would seem to me a crime was committed if we have a pregnant 17 year old. It also appears we know who the perp is and nobody is disputing the facts. I can see how republikins could use this as a "family values" issue but where's the Law-n-Order wing of the party on this? Is statutory rape part of the Alaska experience?
Why don't you call 911 and report the "perp"? Who knows you might stop the media fear frenzy over a conservative veep pick...
Or maybe he's under 18 too.
TN
This is what Republicans pay for preaching 'family values'. You have the extra burden when you talk about how liberals are destroying the family values, god and our culture!
American, etal,
You try to make an issue of Pelin’s pregnant daughter. First of all you look totally ridiculous. Can anyone even imagine what the response would be if a Republican made an issue of a Dum’s pregnant daughter?
I want you to think about something…all the mothers and fathers out there. If Palin had turned down the VP pick, she would have forever placed a guilt trip on her daughter.
Can you jack-leg fools even comprehend what kind of damage that kind of guilt would have done to her daughter? Knowing her mother could have been VP, but didn’t accept because of her? Hell, Pelin had no choice, she had to accept!
I don't know what you are talking about. I never said that she should have turned down the offer. My only point was on how Republicans can become an easy target on issues such as family values.
"Hell, Pelin had no choice, she had to accept!"
you must be joking.
Post a Comment