The usual Democrat election day strategy is being put into place

As Democrats did in MN and all across the country in election after election, Democrats will most likely perform in a large amount of cheating and other unamerican activity to make sure they win.
Brown better win by 3-4% to make sure Dems dont steal another election.

Dem Congressman predicts 'very slow count'...
MSNBC Host: I'd Cheat To Keep Brown From Winning...

and why is this predicted:
Jim Cramer: Brown Win Tuesday Causes Huge Stock Rally...
because the core belief system and actions of liberals is harmful to a free society. Brown will signal the end of liberal dominance and a hope of a return to a free and capitalistic America

Europe’s Socialists Suffering Even in Downturn

Finally even the New York Times comes around to my position.
I have been saying this for years.
Europe was a good 15-20 years ahead of us in socialism. They have had a chance to really really see how terrible it is and how miserably it has failed. It took awhile but the people there have had enough..it has been long enough to give it its chance.
Socialism is tried pretty much everywhere in the world once, it sounds great.
Who doesn't want cheap, free health care for everyone?
Who doesn't want free stuff by simply taxing the crap out of the rich?
Sure...
But it doesn't work.
I have been saying it for years. Liberalism sounds good, but the ideas never, ever work.
They have not worked in Europe, they have never worked anywhere.
Eventually everywhere socialism has been tried has failed and been turned around, accept where a dictator has taken over.

Well, we have Obama and he is trying to make sure the USA gets in line to fail at socialism. Heck, he even seems like he is going for that whole dictator thing right away too.
Lets just hope there are not too many people who really think Obama can build them a new kitchen or get them a new car or whatever...I know that number keeps going up, but I hope that the 20% or so that are hard working yet still believe that liberal/socialist message sounds good finally see how it cant' work and will never work.

Up to $3,800 fine for failure get health insurance

This just seems so wrong.
If there is a way to make it cheaper or have tax breaks for some, okay...even though I wonder where all this money is going to come from.
But how in the hell can you fine someone for not having it.
Should we fine people who do not want to vaccinate babies?
Or have a prostate exam?
or whatever.

We are still a free country, right?
I know that becomes less and less true by the week, but shouldn't we fight for freedom?

Socialized health care: Here it comes

Well, we have the worst economy maybe ever, and now Obama wants to socialize your health care...so for a vast majority of us, ruin your health care.

See, liberals want everything to be "fair" meaning the same for everyone. They do not raise up the poor who don't have it or have poor care, they just lower everyone down to the same crappy level.
You will now have to wait rediculous amounts of time for procedures. People with enough money come from Canada and pay cash for surgery in the US because they do not want to wait so long with their socialized program.
Here is one example from England

Are we going to let the liberals completely ruin our country?
Are we going to allow our health care to be destroyed?
Look at where liberalism has already taken over and how terrible things are there.
Europe is trying to change the terrible consequences of liberalism, and we are just now allowing failed liberal thought and policies destroy our country.
This is terrible.
Here are some more stories
1,000+ page bill would make health care a right in USA...
DEMS TO HIT TOP EARNERS WITH 5.4% SURTAX...
'Since when does our great free-market country punish success'...
Obama airing TV ad touting massive overhaul...

Obama to propose strict new regulation of financial industry

The plan would give the government new powers to seize key companies whose failure jeopardizes the financial system, as well as creation of a watchdog agency to look out for consumers' interests.

Call it socialism, the book 1984...liberals get mad because they know it is true.

This is more true than anyone could have imagined.

The government takes control of companies whenever it feels like it

They tell you what you can eat and drink

What kind of car you can drive

When you can and cant go to the doctor, and how they are allowed to treat you

This is really terrible stuff. My God.

Is America the new Russia?

Well, when you have the President firing CEO's
When news reporters are reprimanded for saying bad things about the President
When the govt controls business
When more and more people are dependant on the govt to survive
What do you call it?

Obama will now cover your car warranty

We need a new word for this, socialism isn't even it now.

My friend was working a few nights ago and he was telling me how all these people that voted for Obama are wondering what the hell they did. Obama can tell CEO's to quit, he gives them billions then tells them maybe they should file for bankruptcy...and he is adding troops in the middle east.

The last one is a good thing, but all you bleeding hearts voted for him because he was going to get the troops home.

He has all of Europe telling him to knock it off...think about that for a minute. The very socialists we are trying to be like have started to learn there lesson, yet we are sprinting full steam ahead WAY past anything the average liberal or socialist could have ever dreamed.

GM CEO resigns at Obama's behest

omg

Punishing the Rich: Obama style

So we are going to raise the taxes of the successful and now take away their itemized deductions.
Once again, liberals think they are doing one thing but are actually doing another.
It is what happens when you base all decisions on emotion and not fact.

When you do not allow the "rich" to itemize deductions, that means they can not write off charitable contributions. Therefore, non-profits are going to suffer greatly.
So, the rich are spending less, firing workers because they have less money, and now the very organizations that are trying to help the people liberals pretend to care about will be gone.

So, is Obama doing this because he WANTS the only people able to help the ever growing helpless in society to be the govt?
Actually, I don't think so.

I think he is just a liberal simpleton and he really thinks he is sticking it to the rich, those evil bad people. He doesn't realize they prop up the arts, non-profit organizations that help the poor, create jobs with their spending habits.
Nope, Obama just thinks the rich have too much money and he is going to redistribute it to the poor...its that simple for a socialist like himself.

We are in for a world of hurt.

U.S. Seeks Expanded Power to Seize Firms

he Obama administration is considering asking Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, according to an administration document.
The government at present has the authority to seize only banks.
Giving the Treasury secretary authority over a broader range of companies would mark a significant shift from the existing model of financial regulation, which relies on independent agencies that are shielded from the political process. The Treasury secretary, a member of the president's Cabinet, would exercise the new powers in consultation with the White House, the Federal Reserve and other regulators, according to the document.

Lets see...
The government is signaling out individuals it doesn't like to tax them more...
They are trying to gain the power to take over whatever fund makes them mad...
What does this sound like...
Give me a minute, it will come to me...

Facing heavy criticism, Associated Bank cancels Puerto Rico trip

I don't know what you want to call it, but here it comes

The federal government is taking over control of just about everything.
Communism?
Socialism?

All I know is that any time a country has its government tell the people what they can and can't do to the extent they take away all motivation to succeed, the economy and society collapses.

Democrats already bash businesses and people with money on a daily basis, they want to tax the crap out of them and punish them for having money.

Now we are going after companies who want to reward hard work and good performance.
Should I just throw in the towel now or keep fighting for the America that is almost gone?

Obama caps executive pay tied to bailout money

Liberals laughed and chuckled when we said Obama was a socialist and will turn this country into a marxists country. Well, what the hell do you call all of this?
This is full steam ahead socialism.
It will severely hurt this country, and it will take a very long time to recover, if we ever can.
We never recovered from the "new deal," so I doubt we will ever completely recover from this...
The problem is who would have done different?
It is true that Obama is sprinting into socialism, but Bush was crawling towards it...
I don't see many politicians who are willing to stand up and fight against more and more huge handouts...
It's what everyone expects now, and politicians cant take all the screaming and yelling from people who want the "free" money...

Deaths caused by hospital mistakes 'up 60 per cent in two years'

Read about a country with socialized medicine...
How bad will we let things get (read bad as liberal) before we see that all this stuff has been done, and has failed...

How to teach socialism to a child

Halloween is coming up, it is already over in some communities.

An easy way to explain socialism to your child is to have them go out and work very hard going to as many houses as possible, then going home and tell them that Barry Obama has been elected President and he thinks it is unfair that you have so much candy and others do not have any. Therefore, Dad is forced to take half the candy out of your bag and walk around the neighborhood and give it to kids who did not go trick or treating this year. And he can't say the candy came from you, he has to say it came from Barry.

HOW 'LIBERAL' CARE WOULD KILL TED

IRONICALLY enough, the dangers of the lib eral health-care agenda are being made clear by the care that a liberal icon, Sen. Ted Kennedy, has received since his brain seizure last month.
One day after an MRI detected a tumor, Kennedy was quickly diagnosed with a malignant glioma - a rare and often-fatal form of brain cancer. Less than two weeks later, his tumor was being removed by one of the world's experts in brain cancer at Duke Univeristy Medical Center. He'll follow up with chemo and radiation therapy tailored to the genetic makeup of his cancer to keep the cancer from spreading.
He'll likely take Avastin, a drug that in experiments with brain cancer has extended survival by months. A new cancer vaccine being developed in partnership with Pfizer could extend his life by six years.
Of course, with his wealth and power, Kennedy would get good treatment anywhere. But the same care is available to every American.
Not so - if we make the health "reforms" called for by Kennedy and other liberals.
Filmmaker Michael Moore gives their standard line when he says: "There are problems in all health-care systems, but at least Europeans and Canadians have a health-care system that covers everyone."
Problem is, governments that promise to "cover everyone" always wind up cutting corners simply to save money. People with Kennedy's condition are dying or dead as a result.
Consider Jennifer Bell of Norwich, England. In 2006, the 22-year-old complained of headaches for months - but Britain's National Health Service made her wait a year to see a neurologist.
Then she had to wait more than three months before should could get what the NHS decided was only a "relatively urgent" MRI scan. Three days before the MRI appointment, she died.
Consider, too, the chemo drug Kennedy is receiving: Temodar, the first oral medicine for brain tumors in 25 years.
Temodar has been widely used in this country since the FDA approved it in 2000. But a British health-care rationing agency, the National Institute for Comparative Effectiveness, ruled that, while the drug helps people live longer, it wasn't worth the money - and denied coverage for it.
Barack Obama - and other Democrats - have been pushing a Senate bill to set up a similar US "review board" for Medicare and any future government health-care plan.
After denying this treatment completely for seven years, the NICE (did whoever named it intend the irony?) relented - partly. Even today, only a handful of Brits with brain tumors can get Temodar.
And if you want to pay for Temodar out of your own pocket, the British system forces you to pay for all of your cancer care - about $30,000 a month.
Things are no different in Canada, where the wait for an MRI (once you finally get a referral) has grown to 10 weeks. For Canadians relying on their government health care, the average wait time from diagnosis of cancer to surgery is beyond the guideline set by both the US and European societies for surgical oncology.
And HealthCanada, the government system, similar refuses to pay for treatments that are often covered in America.
Chad Curley, a 37-year-old auto worker from Windsor, Ontario, had a brain tumor like Kennedy's but can't have surgery because his is too large to be operable.
His tumor didn't respond to Temodar and the same doctors now treating Sen. Kennedy told him and his wife that the Avastin combination could stop his tumor from growing and add months to his life. But HealthCanada wouldn't pay to use Avastin to treat his tumor.
Chad's family and friends scraped together the $5,000 for the first round of treatment in mid-November; they later saw Chad's left-side paralysis start to subside. But the money ran out - and he died on Feb. 21.
In pushing for government-run health care, liberals are pushing for a system where only the Ted Kennedys of the world can get cutting-edge - and life-saving - care.

Taxpayers May Face Hurricane Tab

Keep voting for Dems, they are about to put a HUGE burden on us taxpayers.
Who does this benefit?
The small amount of Americans who decide to live where there are hurricanes...
So lets make sure the entire country foots the bill for risky behavior again.
Democrats want to put taxes on potato chips and McDonalds because it is bad for you,
but they are willing to subsidize and encourage people to live where their house can be destroyed.
Then they will complain that we have a deficit.

Holes blown in budget

Once again, the things being cut are things that people who actually pay taxes might use.
No mention at all of any social programs being cut.
In a liberal town, the responsible and successful keep getting less and less while paying more and more...

Chavez says U.S. relations could worsen with McCain

So what this story is saying is a socialist dictator supports the Democrat candidate...and they get mad when we say people like Osama want dems in office...here is proof that they do...
Lets see how many dictators and terror leaders support the Dems...
That makes two that I know of...Chavez and Osama

Dems trying to enact more socialism: The Fairness Doctrine

GREAT speech by Bush about this topic:

“This organization has had many important missions, but none more important than ensuring our airways - America’s airways - stay open to those who preach the ‘Good News.’ The very first amendment to our Constitution includes the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion. Founders believed these unalienable rights were endowed to us by our Creator. They are vital to a healthy democracy, and we must never let anyone take those freedoms away.”
” I mention this because there’s an effort afoot that would jeopardize your right to express your views on public airways. Some members of Congress want to reinstate a regulation that was repealed 20 years ago. It has the Orwellian name called the Fairness Doctrine. Supporters of this regulation say we need to mandate that any discussion of so-called controversial issues on the public airwaves includes equal time for all sides. This means that many programs wanting to stay on the air would have to meet Washington’s definition of balance. Of course, for some in Washington, the only opinions that require balancing are the ones they don’t like.”
“We know who these advocates of so-called balance really have in their sights: shows hosted by people like Rush Limbaugh or James Dobson, or many of you here today. By insisting on so-called balance, they want to silence those they don’t agree with. The truth of the matter is, they know they cannot prevail in the public debate of ideas. They don’t acknowledge that you are the balance … The country should not be afraid of the diversity of opinions. After all, we’re strengthened by diversity of opinions.”

How much different are the Democrats to Hugo Chavez?

Hugo Chavez has recently said that his country now owns all the equipment and pipelines (billions of dollars of investment from the evil Exon/Mobile) Exon has in his country.
How much different is that from the Democrats who want to take over 17 billion dollars from oil companies over the next 10 years for "alternative fuel exploration?"
Also, a few questions:
1. Who gets to decide what are too much profits for a company? The profit margin on gas is very low compared to other products.
2. Which other companies are next in line to be robbed of profits?
3. How close is this to flat out socialism?
4. When they do raise taxes 17 billion, who do you think ends up paying that? (so its really another tax increase for you).

I know this is a tough sell because oil companies do have huge numbers in the profit margin. I do understand they spend a lot of money on developing new forms of energy and new ways to get old energy...they also have employ a large number of people and have small profit margins. The government makes way more on a gallon of gas than oil companies.I just hate to see Democrats continue to attack evil corporations when it is these companies that create so many jobs.
Again, Dems probably don't even realize they are going to hurt the people they think they are helping.