Just another story of anti-Bush liberal caught in a lie, while the media drools all over it self covering it.
This story is amazing. Here is another example of someone saying whatever it takes to bring down Bush. Whether it be changing the story on judges or, in this case, changing the story on talking to the President about your dead son, the left will do whatever it takes to bring down Bush. Why don't the dems change their name to "United Against Bush" or "The Do-anythings" or "The see what sticks party".
Just in case this link breaks, this mother met with President Bush after her son had died in Iraq...Originally she talked about the concern Bush had, how they talked about God, and how they both wanted his death to be apart of a greater cause that had to be finished.
Now she is saying he wouldn't look at a picture of her son, he didn't really seem to care, he didn't even know her sons name, and he acted like the whole event was a party...
And where is the media on this??? They are too busy trying to illegally dig up some judges adoption records, that is some hard hitting journalism...All the while the liberal media allows this women to lie to the country...
But this is a problem. Most people come home from work, put on the news for 30 minutes, and see these story and do not know it is made up lie. Most people don't know the crap they see on NBCCVSABCCNNMSNBC is liberal non-sense.
Now I know, republicans do that same thing...But why is it that all these stories of changing stories and lying happen consistently on the left, usually to get Bush. And just to refresh your memory, lying is when you say something you KNOW is not true. This lady knows she is lying, that is not equal to the WHOLE WORLD being fooled about WMD's.
That is another trick of the left...To have a story about a lib killing someone then bringing up the fact that one time a Republican in 1957 threw some paper on the ground.
But this is what libs do, they say anything it takes to bring down their opponent. They say one thing, polls show it doesn't work, and they lie and say something else.
Why shouldn't they, it works and they get away with it. They know the media will never question them. I'm sure all these false stories have NOTHING to do with Bush's numbers falling...
Until people start realizing what is going on, or the media starts doing their job, libs will continue to pull crap like this...
But it is especially evil in this case when you use your sons death for political gain.
Come on libs, lets see your links of losely related stories where republican's lie...this is a story actuall catching someone lying just to get Bush. There is no stretching of the mind needed to figure this one out...
Posts
11 comments:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/stephen-elliott/mother-of-fallen-soldier-_5325.html
Here is the origional article...just so you will have the "Facts".
http://www.thereporter.com/search/ci_2923921
Okay, the article confirms the Drudge report story and my blog...thanks ron for backing me up...
The first Huffingtonpost web page doesn't really say anything.
So, ron is agreeing, I guess, that this lady has changed her story.
found more proof of this liar:
Marine Mom Lisa L. writes:
My son was in Iraq with the 2/4 Battallion the same time Casey Sheehan was there. Eric had some close friends die during the 7 months they were there. A couple of the moms of the dead troops are a member of an email support group I belong to and they both recounted their visit with Bush. Bush makes every effort to meet with the families of the fallen and he is very warm and loving toward them all. He has cried with the families, has talked with them at length, even about if the death was worth it, and for one mom, he asked for the picture she showed him of her son. Sheehan is dishonoring her son's memory and hurting our troops.
http://www.michellemalkin.com/
Nice coverage, thanks.
Some of what you said is just false..
every country said Iraq had WMD's, even France and Germany...
I don't believe this war is senseless...I wrote a blog explaining this, but basically...there is a possibility that Bush will transform the entire middle east from a bunch of dictatorships, to democratic strongholds...
since the war:
women can go to school
women can work
there have been democratic elections in Afghanistan
elections in Iraq
a constitution in Iraq (and I know the left is going to try and say that women do not have enough rights in it, but the fact that they have ANY and can talk about so freely shows immense progress)
elections in Palestine
even in Iran they had to make up some for of an election to please the people...
Women and moderates are finally getting the will to fight the Islamic extremists...all thanks to what has happened from this "senseless war"
go to http://whycarenews.blogspot.com/
for more perspective from someone who is in the military...
and no, this woman did not earn the right to exploit her sons death for political gain...
just to clarify AGAIN, lying is when you know something is not true and you say it anyway...I have PROVEN that this women lied at least one time...Bush and the rest of the world did not LIE, they might have said things that were not true, but there is a difference.
Enough for now...
I do agree with you that the real reason for the Iraq war was a vision creating democracies across the middle-east (and this is now well documented), with a tonic of gaining air bases (also documented) and a tiny pinch of more secure access to oil (but not to steal oil).
Why is it any of our business whether other countries have democracy? Looking for wmd's I can sort of understand, since we are trying to protect ourselves from a threat, but even that stands on pretty sketchy grounds. This whole war, to me, seems more like we are trying to add territories to our land, just as kings and emporers of the past would try to take over surrounding lands, that seems to be happening now. After we are "done" in Iraq, we will head into Iran. Then perhaps Afghanistan or a few other Arab countries. All in the name of "Democracy". Because we feel as though we have some moralistic superiority over these people, who are just stuck in the dark ages because they don't allow their women to have any "rights".
Now, I don't think that everything they do is right, but it is their religion. That is how they chose to set it up and I am not going to try to kill someone to try to convince them that what they are doing is wrong. These are the sort of things that will eventually start to happen to Christians. It already is to a certain extent.
And, by the way, who do you think put Saddam into power in the first place??
Shana,
I don't think we are trying to gain more territories.
I think we are trying to stop another Nazi Germany from happening...we see that there is an area in the world that is a "perfect storm" for terrorism. However, I think things will change as long as we give the people in the middle east hope that they can run their own countries.
Islam is not a bad thing, but the radicals that blow people up us Islam as their reason for their behavior...
anamericanway:
we seem to be closer in opinion this time:
but I do not think it is important that people thank us now...when someone stops something bad from happening they are not thanked, because no one knows that the bad thing was going to happen...
I always had a thought in my head that Bush thought the middle east was a threat to a free world, and maybe he did use momentum from 9-11 to accomplish his goals...
I still think that in 10 years things will be better in the middle east, and there will be some other area we have to worry about..
Look at china, I think China is a real threat to the USA if they want to be, I don't think we needed the middle east to end up as big of a problem as China..
but good posts by shana and anamericanway
Instead we left them to the Soviets, and supported the tyrants instead.
Yes, and we created Saddam, too. We put him in power, then complained when he got too big for his britches.
Post a Comment