Another core Dem believe being rejected by Americans

Majority of Americans, and Nearly 6 in 10 Young Adults, View Abortion as Morally Wrong...

Another reason not to murder your baby...

Royal college warns abortions can lead to mental illness

Great story by Kevin Fischer regarding Roe v Wade

First section:

During these catastrophic events in American history, there were the following number of deaths:
Hurricane Katrina fatalities: over 1800
Pearl Harbor: approximately 2350
9/11 victims: approximately 3000
American deaths in the Iraq War thus far: over 3900
American deaths in the Vietnam War: approximately 58,000
World War Two American casualties: approximately 418,500
There have been more than 48.5 million abortions in the United States since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 35 years ago today that abortion was legal.

Abortions in US at lowest level since 1976: report

So I guess the liberal-God-given right to murder babies is not really as popular as liberals want it to be.
Never a reason to murder a baby.

HILL EYES NATIONAL CIG CURB

link
I thought liberals were "pro-choice."
I guess that doesn't include the choice to smoke a legal cigarette.
Really, the only thing liberals do let you choose is killing babies.
They don't want you go choose to own a gun.
They don't want you to choose how to spend your money.
They don't want you to choose your health care.
They don't want you to choose how you invest your SS money.
Only the baby killing thing.

It was interesting to see this story after seeing the Hillary says smoking kills everyone story:
100-year-old celebrates her birthday by smoking 170,000th cigarette

Healthy Wisconsin and abortion

Under the Senate Democrats' Healthy Wisconsin health insurance plan, Wisconsin taxpayers will be forced to pay for the abortion of any Wisconsin woman, including:
The married woman who isn't sure who the father of her baby is and doesn't want her husband to know she's got a boyfriend;
The woman who is having her third abortion;
The woman who doesn't want the inconvenience of a baby to interfere with her career plans
The woman who doesn't want to appear in a bikini with stretch marks
Any other woman, for any other reason, as many times as she wants too, no questions asked, no restrictions whatsoever.

I really don't think I want my hard earned tax money going for this, do you?

Democrats pledge support for wide access to abortion

WASHINGTON -- Elizabeth Edwards said Tuesday that her husband's health-care plan would provide insurance coverage of abortion.

There ya go, my taxes are going to be used to kill babies.
Actually I am very happy about this announcement, the libs are kicking their moonbat liberalism into high gear. Even though about half the country is okay with abortion being legal "if the health of the mother is threatened" (which is crap because with modern techniques that barely ever happens, but keep using that as your excuse), there is just about NO ONE who is for late-term abortion and I am going to guess that most are not in favor of government sponsored baby killing.

Researchers make stem cells from skin

I have said in the past that some liberals want to open up embryonic research because it sends the message that the embryo is just a "thing". That is the big struggle. Pro-life people want you to think an embryo is a human being, and pro-abortion people want you to think an embryo is just protoplasm. Using embryos for research helps forward the notion they are not babies...
Well, it looks like abortion lovers have lost another tool to further their mission.

Legislators to Reintroduce Wisconsin’s Partial Birth Abortion Ban

From the blog of Kevin Fischer

This is a no-brainer

Explain the need for late term abortions

I just can't get over it.
Liberals claim to be compassionate, claim to care about life, but they think its okay to kill a baby.
There is no doubt that is what it is, period
Jay had he LAME ass link that doesn't show that late term abortions are needed. With the medical technology available today, there is just about NO TIME a late term abortion is needed to save the life of the mother. Why do you need it guys?
99.9% of the time it is used to kill a perfectly healthy baby...
You are not for choice an any other aspect of life, except the killing of a baby, please explain this...
And the late term is even more evil, because there is no reason for it, and it definitely kills a baby that can live outside the body...you guys are flat out evil.

Here are some actual facts, not Jay's lame ass story on Daily Kos:
-- the decision, in February 1997, by Ron Fitzsimmons -- then and now the executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers -- to repudiate what he called "the party line." Fitzsimmons estimated that the method was used 3,000-5,000 times annually, and "in the vast majority of cases" on "a healthy mother with a healthy fetus that is 20 weeks or more along" (New York Times, Feb. 26, 1997). Subsequently, other spokespersons for major abortion providers publicly defended Fitzsimmons and affirmed the accuracy of his statements.http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/PBA%20NYT%20lied.pdfhttp://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/PBA%20activists%20lied.pdfhttp://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/AMAFitzimmons1997.pdf

What new evidence has come to light since 1997 only reinforces the conclusion that some practitioners use the method routinely during the fifth and sixth months of pregnancy, and even later, and that the vast majority of partial-birth abortions do not involve any acute medical circumstances. For example, Kansas became the only state to enact a law that requires reporting of partial-birth abortions separately from other abortion methods. The first full year the law was in effect (1999), Kansas abortionists reported that they performed 182 partial-birth abortions on babies who were defined by the abortionists themselves as "viable," and they also reported that all 182 of these were performed for "mental" (as opposed to "physical") health reasons. See the compilation here.

In January 1997, the PBS documentary program MEDIA MATTERS devoted a major segment to an examination of how much of the news media had uncritically adopted as fact assertions that were highly disputed from the beginning, and that were disproved when belatedly subjected to journalistic scrutiny. The transcript is here:http://www.pbs.org/wnet/mediamatters99/transcript2.htmlOne of the journalists interviewed in the MEDIA MATTERS program was Washington Post medical writer David Brown, M.D. After interviewing numerous abortionists, Dr. Brown wrote, "[I]n most cases where the procedure is used, the physical health of the woman whose pregnancy is being terminated is not in jeopardy." He also said, "Most people who got this procedure were really not very different from most people who got abortions." After all that, can the pro-abortion advocacy groups revive the myth? It looks like they're trying. The Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), in a September 17, 2003 press release, asserted that the bill would "outlaw a medical procedure used primarily in emergency abortions." http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/PPrelease091703.html

You should really be ashamed of yourselves

Supreme Court OKs Abortion Procedure Ban

And you say your vote does not count...
The constitution was upheld today...
You want to vote for an ass who talks like this:
HILLARY: 'Erosion of our constitutional rights'...
or this ass
OBAMA: 'I strongly disagree'...

Show me where it says you have a right to stab a baby in the back of the head when it is perfectly able to live outside the body?
Why do liberals want women to have the right to kill a baby but not the right to "choose" to be prostitutes? or use drugs?
Lets hear it liberals...You are not really pro choice...just pro dead baby...