Story here
Here is the first test of Bush's "conservative nominee."
This isn't even a controversial issue...I mean this exact case...
What is wrong with having to let your parents know you are going to kill your baby?
Don't give me the: "its her body" crap
If you are under 18, you need parents permission to get into an R rated movie, but Liberals think that a 14 year old is mature enough to make this decision on her own?
Lets get a list going of all the things you can't do until you are 18 or older, yet in some states you can get an abortion....
...then the lefties can tell me why that is okay...
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Court to Consider Parental Notification Before Abortion
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
9 comments:
Make the parents liable for the baby, and I say no problem.
by liable do you mean responsible...they are until the parent is 18...ever hear of adoption rhyno???
dude, where did that come from...go out and get laid man. I didnt realize we were in a reproductive rights conversation. Seriously, thats what this ISNT. Its about minors, and their parents rights. Here is the scenario I imagine. A 17 1/2 yr old gets pregnant. If she will be too far into the pregnancy by the time she turns 18, abortion is way out of the question. However, if her parents wont let her do it when she is still 17, then they should carry the financial and personal burden all the way through the end of term....even though she is already 18. At that point she is old enough to say whether she wants to give it up for adoption.
It is interesting that you can't give a student at school so much as an aspirin without consent, but abortion is ok????
I think tattoos and piercings also need parental consent.
I'm sure someone will trot out the incest and abuse case scenario, but the law takes that into account.
well done commish..
and if I understand rhyno, yes...the parent is responsible until the "child" is 18...meaning the person that was too young to get pregnant in the first place...
...and I am saying, they should be responsible til that person has the baby. Is that the same thing, meaning as long as she is 18, and not 18 and a day, it goes?
Rhyno....the parents of the pregnant juvenile ARE LEGALLY financially responsible for BOTH the pregnant minor, AND her child. They are financially responsible for all medical costs, childraising costs (for both mom and infant). If the parents should choose to disown the pregnant minor, guess what Rhyno! Yep, that's right! The state welfare department, IN ALL 50 states, WILL SUE the PARENTS for child support costs for BOTH the pregnant minor, AND after the baby is born, for child support costs of the fruit of their minor child's womb...YET THESE PARENTS of the pregnant minor have absolutely NO RIGHTS to EVEN KNOW IF their child is pregnant. And they are denied any rights to decide whether their grandchild should live or die.
Rhyno, 'dude', your immaturity shows more and more every day.
I just realized the need to clarify for the simple minded, stoned libs, uhhh, that includes you, 'dude'.
The paragraph {YET THESE PARENTS of the pregnant minor have absolutely NO RIGHTS to EVEN KNOW IF their child is pregnant. And they are denied any rights to decide whether their grandchild should live or die.}
is referring to the fact that the parents will be sued to be forced to be responsible for their minor's sexual activities fruitions...if the minor desires to let the baby live.
However, these same financially responsible parents (worthy enough for the government to sue) have NO rights when deciding whether the baby should live, if their minor chooses to kill the baby. The parents don't even have the right to know that they had a grandchild before their minor decides to kill the baby...that's screwed up logic. I guess I'd have to smoke as much weed as 'dude' to understand that logic.
I was hoping that an issue such as this wouldn't reach the Supreme Court until after Justice Alito took his seat. As it stands now, Sandra Day-O'Connor is still the swing vote and that could end up being another bad decision for the SCOTUS.
Post a Comment