Just wanted to make sure everyone knew that on Saturday the national guard has a sending off ceremony for troops going to Iraq. They had to stand at attention for 45 extra minutes waiting for the very important Russ Feingold to show up......he never did. Jim Doyle was there, Herb Kohl...everyone else that was supposed to be there was...
What happened Russ?
If you have a conflict, atleast have the respect to let the troops know so they stop waiting for you to show up for your photo shoot.
But when you think about it, when has Russ ever shown any respect for our military? Telling them to run away from their job certainly isn't it.....lets censure you.
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Way to go Russ
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
16 comments:
Do you have a source for this? I cant find a single thing on it.
My source is Mike Marx who was one of the people standing there, listening to Jim Doyle and Herb Kolh get pissed when Russ kept being late...
Um, a source is a fact-based source of information, in this case, since the medium is internet, the source would be a direct link to this story you are talking about.
One that we can all see, and click up for ourselves.
Again, I raise the point that your so-called "facts" are bullsh!@ until you do so, and we will all laugh until the cows come home, until you start backing these things up, and not just spout lies about them.
Thank you.
Wow, dedanna is pretty stupid. Was the point of that post that a person standing at the ceremony isn't a credible source of news? If that is the case the entire liberal media train can just come crashing to the ground. It is uncommon to have eyewitnesses when conjecture and withc-hunting will suffice. What did dedanna do before the internet when people had to go places to get the news?
Scorpion says---
A SOLDIER waiting to leave for active duty is the best source of a
credible witness to the FACT that our embarrassment in the Wisconsin senate didn't see this appearance in the state wasn't to his advantage in catering to the growing number of uninformed whiners that he feels is his best
chance to remain the mediocre career politician that he is. I
would guess GAME, that you could get hundreds of far better"sources"
than the lame losers of the staff
of our "Urinal" newspaper that were
actually there sending off the troops instead of being too incompetent to report about no-show
no-guts Russ. Of course, if dunce-
danna needs better sources than a
soldier who has left to defend the right to say the drivel that I find
so comical here regularly,then I can understand why with the aging of America's greatest generation I
SHUDDER to think of more and more
mor-ons and jumbled thinking being
imagined as valid in the future.
Since Mike said it, I believe it happened, but without some sort of input from the other side, I'll withhold judgement til something comes out.
good point scorpion...
our soldiers put their lives on the line so idiots can say whatever they want...and usually these are the people that are trashing their work and purpose...
I know there is someone from the senate looking at this right now...care to comment? Maybe you can clear this up...
Again, my point is that this medium is the internet, where anyone and everyone can click up this thread (so-called story) that game's posted.
Game *claims* to have *heard* this from someone who was there (anyone can say they *heard* something from *someone*, doesn't make it true; only makes it rumor), which is not a credible source for those entering this medium, or any site. Game, I've noticed, is good at this -- not backing up with credible sources.
I heard that GWB will be impeached tomorrow. Just because I said this, is it true?
Please post a link, or a verifiable source of information. 'nuff said.
look to ave. joe and scorpion to see again why you are so very wrong...
I'll take the word of the troops
Then send a link where the troops said that.
Again, give us a verifiable source of information pls, last chance before I label this thread bullsh*!@.
You give a verifiable source of information, everyone can sit here and say "you won".
As it is, you're leaving everyone hanging, making fun of you.
Game, let me put it to you like this: people half-way or more across the U.S. are not going to believe you if you don't do this.
How can we see that this happened if you don't?
*If* you want to say that this is a local blog only, in which local people can assume facts, then state it at the top of your blog, and the rest of us will bow out.
When you write a thesis, you back up your facts. This goes for anything, in which facts are debatable. If the medium is local, then state them as local, when, where.
For instance, I can not see or speak to the officer (military) that said this -- therefore it is unverifiable to me, and b.s.
you are correct that the media will not write about it, but it did happen. I was there. They stood there for 45 min, Russ was supposed to be there, and he never showed....I'm varifying it myself.
I can't varify it with media links, but that does not make it BS.
When you are first hand witness, you don't need to varify it...
That's v-erify.
So, you ask that we trust you on this one?
Ok. I see.
can't spell
Post a Comment