Monday, May 15, 2006

CONSERVATIVES NEED 12-STEP PROGRAM TO MANHOOD


It's pretty pathetic when a Kennedy is too drunk to drive into the Potomac. After the visibly intoxicated Rep. Patrick Kennedy crashed his car into a police barrier near the Capitol just before 3 a.m. last Thursday morning, he explained to the police he was hurrying back to the Capitol for a vote, a procedure known on the Hill as "last call." It could have been a lot worse: Patrick's designated driver that night was Ted Kennedy.

At some point in his scrolling list of excuses, Kennedy eventually claimed he was addicted to prescription drugs and checked himself into the newly opened Kennedy Wing of the Mayo Clinic. He explained he had been "sleep driving." If people fall for his story, his father, Ted, plans to attribute his last immigration bill to "sleep legislating."

Coming right on the heels of a three-year witch-hunt directed at Rush Limbaugh for an addiction to prescription drugs (because of his politics) — as well as the continuing threat to put Tom DeLay in prison (because of his politics) — you would think there would be at least some serious discussion of prosecuting the young Kennedy for his addiction to prescription drugs, too.

Perhaps the Republican attorney general in Washington needs to interview Democratic Palm Beach prosecutor Barry Krischer, who wasted three years and untold taxpayer dollars trying to frame Limbaugh, about the danger to society of prescription drug addiction.

Baseball has a system to protect batters from being hit: If your pitcher hits one of our guys, our pitcher will hit one of your guys. This is also the only argument that ever works with Democrats.

Democrats adored the independent counsel statute — until it was used to catch an actual felon in the Oval Office. Then they noticed all sorts of problems with the law. Democrats swore up and down that women never lie about rape — until that same felon was credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick on "NBC News," not to mention the four other card-carrying Democratic women who described being raped by Bill Clinton in eerily similar detail in Christopher Hitchens' book "No One Left To Lie To."

Conservatives will continue to be threatened with prison on trumped-up charges until Democrats start having to worry about being prosecuted for minor offenses, too — though, in Kennedy's case, not as minor as Rush Limbaugh's offense, which never involved smashing his car into a police barrier. (In Rep. Kennedy's defense, at least he didn't drown the woman in his car and then disappear for nine hours.)

Democrats have declared war against Republicans, and Republicans are wandering around like a bunch of ninny Neville Chamberlains, congratulating themselves on their excellent behavior. They'll have some terrific stories about their Gandhi-like passivity to share while sitting in cells at Guantanamo after Hillary is elected.

For a political party that grasps the concept of victory against foreign enemies, Republicans can't seem to grasp that concept when it comes to domestic enemies. Instead of taking a page from Sun-tzu's "Art of War," when it comes to fighting liberals, American conservatives prefer the Jimmy Carter unconditional surrender strategy.

Patriotic Americans don't have to become dangerous psychotics like liberals, but they could at least act like men.

Why hasn't the former spokesman for the Taliban matriculating at Yale been beaten even more senseless than he already is? According to Hollywood, this nation is a cauldron of ethnic hatreds positively brimming with violent skinheads. Where are the skinheads when you need them? What does a girl have to do to get an angry, club- and torch-wielding mob on its feet?

There is not the remotest possibility that a man who was recently defending shooting women in the head for wearing nail polish will so much as be snubbed on the Yale campus.

The only violence on college campuses these days occurs when people like David Horowitz, Michelle Malkin and me show up to give a speech in defense of America. Then we need bomb-sniffing dogs and a lecture hall lined with armed police. But a Talibanist goes about his day at Yale unmolested.

Conservatives may shrink from confrontation with howling, violent liberals, but as General "Buck" Turgidson in "Dr. Strangelove" informed the milquetoast president still hoping to avert a nuclear confrontation with the Russkies: "Well, Mr. President, I would say that General Ripper has already invalidated that policy."

Well, conservatives, I would say liberals have already invalidated your "Let's all just get along" policy.

The violence and threats of imprisonment have started. Now the only question is whether conservatives will choose victory.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Little Oral Annie, such a wordster....

Too bad she's insane. It would take me all day to refute all the crappy logic in her speech, but I will just point out tis one:

'I would say liberals have already invalidated your "Let's all just get along" policy.'

Insane. Let the SPIIIIIIIIIN begin.

Though , I did like this one:

In Rep. Kennedy's defense, at least he didn't drown the woman in his car and then disappear for nine hours.

The Game said...

Once again, Ann has perfectly stated her case...instead of name calling, say why what she said is wrong

The Game said...

Lets see:
Dem's can go after Republicans simply because they are from the right, but why don't the Repub's do the same?
Good point...She gives examples of Dem's doing it, and Repub's not doing it...

And the thing about not caring about protecting the victim and caring about womens rights in regards to Clinton is PERFECT...

Anonymous said...

Oh, dont get me wrong, she uses valid information. Its the way she horribly puts it all together that reeks of crazy. I dont have the time or inclination to refute every dumb thing she says in there. Its so full of holes, it makes an EH post look like an encyclopedia. To refute your comment, and go back to the one I earlier made. there isnt one Con out there, especially Oral Annie, who can claim they 'never meanded no harm' or whatever bullshit. The relentless name-calling and branding by the Cons started during the Clinton presidency, and reached uncontrolled levels during the Bush administration, and BY the Bush administration. Its followed him everywhere he has gone because his little hip-pocket thug, Karl Rove uses it at all times to create hatred of Bush's political opponents. More than anything else, I would be pissed that a psycho emaciated cunt was calling me less than a man. Well, if I was a con, I would be.

The Game said...

man rhyno, you are not partisan at all...you call it right down the middle, very open minded...proud of you.

Jim said...

Game, you expect rhyno to walk some sort of centrist line on a blog that is so partisan right, it can't stand up by itself.

And to top it all off, you use Ann Coulter for . . . anything. She is the biggest conservative whore in journalism, and that's saying alot considering Hack Malkin.

Here is something she said that is wrong, slanderous in fact. An occupant of a car driven by Ted Kennedy which ran off a narrow bridge in the dark of night drowned in the accident. Nowhere is there any evidence that Kennedy "drowned" anybody. It was a horrible accident, Kennedy may have been drinking in which case he was negligent.

But "drown a woman"? Slanderous lie. But what's new?

The Game said...

when I talk to older people who were already in their 20's or 30's....they think Kennedy is a drunk murderer...I am too young for the time...

but it seems Kennedy is as "innocent" as OJ...see Jim, this is one of those times when you could just be intellectually honest...

I know you don't think I am, but I really am...I think for myself...and when someone looks as bad is Kennedy or OJ, you have to put politics aside and call a spade a spade

The Game said...

and if that is all you think Ann said wrong...then you must agree with her general position...

I'm sure I think most of the people you like to read are liberal crap...

I think she is so articulate, so well spoken, I love listening to and reading her...sorry

Anonymous said...

She's a psycho. I dont say liar, because I believe she lives in the fantasy world she writes from. I never claimed to be center or moderate, nor have I ever said anything besides being nominally Libertarian. I tend to pan left or right, and rarely down the middle. When the Con freakshow begins its drool show, they alienate most thinking beings. Its not my fault I happen to be one.

Jim said...

I can't imagine there is anything of value that Coulter has to say let alone anything I would agree with.

I do remember the Chappaquiddick incident. Yeah, I'm that old. He didn't kill anybody. He didn't drown anybody. He was drunk, probably. At least he had been drinking. He had an accident driving a dark dirt road over a narrow, rickety bridge after a party. He went into the water, too. He says he went back in to try to get her out. There is absolutely no evidence to refute that. Did he wait too long to go to the police? Yeah (like Cheney). Did he get special treatment? Yeah, he's a Kennedy in Massachucetts, what would you expect?

So this drowned a woman, murdered a woman is slanderous bullshit which is exactly what Coulter's "journalistic" output amounts to.

Dedanna said...

So why is this subject being debated at all?

Bush is a drunk.

His twins are drunks.

There's probably a couple mil more, who knows, in our gov't who are drunks.

Why is Kennedy taking flack all over again for something dead and gone into the past, and for something that our wonderful *gag* politicians do anyway, from either side of the fence (repub & dem)?

Just curious --