Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Connecticut Groups Push to Remove Lieberman From Ballot

HARTFORD, Conn., Aug. 21 -- Critics of Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman's independent run to keep his job attacked on two fronts Monday, with one group asking an elections official to throw him out of the Democratic Party and a former rival calling on state officials to keep his name off the November ballot.

Here is an actual example of someone's constitutional rights being infringed upon, and of course, its being done by liberals. Liberals hallucinate about Bush taking away privacy and other rights through the patriot act, wiretapping and data collection... but here we have liberal groups trying to take away a person's right to run for political office and the right of the people to vote who they want to represent them.

It is ALWAYS lefties who hate free speech and try and take that right away from people who don't agree with them. Lieberman agrees with the Left 90% of the time, but since he now says one thing the intolerant liberals do not like, they are going to "punish" him and take try and destroy him.


So much for diversity, freedom of speech and tolerance.

5 comments:

Michael said...

Amen.

Jim said...

"Orman, a Fairfield University professor of political science" . . . "filed with the state Monday that the senator should be kept off the Nov. 7 ballot"

Those dirty politicing, rotten political science professors!

And those dirty rotten peace activists. Imagine asking that someone who refuses to abide by the decision of the majority of Democrats in CT be kicked out of the party. How DARE they!?

Besides, we all know what this is about. Republics won't support their own candidate for CT senator. Why is that? Well, if Lieberman wins in November, then Bush can accept Rummy's resignation, appoint his buddy Lieberman, and have a Republic CT governor appoint his replacement.

Why do you think Rove offered to help "one of the most liberal senators in congress"?

The Game said...

it is legal for someone to run as an ind. and the polls show a majority of people are going to vote for him..so Jim is saying he is not pro-choice on this issue, right?

Jim said...

I'm not saying that at all. I'm simply showing how inane this post is. A university professor and a group of peace activists do not represent the Democratic Party nor any attempt by the Democratic Party to keep Lieberman from running. The CT Democratic party tried to keep Joe from running by electing his opponent to be the official candidate of the Democratic party.

The Game said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.