Today, I was listening to Mark Belling (local conservative talk show host)...
He said that the reason Clinton went on FOX was that he wanted to attack what some consider a conservative station so he try and squash the fact that many consider his only legacy that he did nothing to fight Bin Laden or Al qaeda. He couldn't go on all the liberal shows, because then he couldn't have went off like he did.
Its an interesting theory. It is true that Wallace asked a very legit question, and then Clinton went off...
And Belling is right about a few things. Bill Clinton didn't try and do anything that he didn't have to do. He did nothing about terror, social security, medicare funding, border security, and on and on...
If Clinton wanted to give an honest answer to the question, he would have said, "I didn't do anything about terror, because I didn't think it was that big a problem, and neither did anybody else." That would be an honest and pretty much correct statement.
He's just upset that he has no good legacy, only blow jobs and doing no job.
Monday, September 25, 2006
Interesting points
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
27 comments:
Wow, that Belling is such a liar.
Clinton went on FNC because he was invited to talk about the CGI. FNC and Wallace admit that. He's been doing CGI meida all week--he was even on "the Daily Show" last Monday.
Incidently, given how anti-teacher Belling is, how can you stand to listen to him?
I usually turn him off when he talks about education
and I didn't say Belling was correct, but it is interesting and the rest of the points are correct
Ok, you've done 5 threads on this topic alone game. Capitalizing on one single thing about a former pReZ who got a blow job or two and didn't do a whole helluva lot else to harm anyone in order to make a point isn't going to get you very far. Use some other examples, ok? This one's getting very old and tired, and doesn't hold much h2o.
Game, I believe this WAS a calculation by Clinton. He knew what he would be asked and he was ready for it.
Why? Because he's not going to stand for anymore of yours and the right-wing hacks' bullshit about Clinton not doing anything about terrorism.
Game said: If Clinton wanted to give an honest answer to the question, he would have said, "I didn't do anything about terror, because I didn't think it was that big a problem, and neither did anybody else." That would be an honest and pretty much correct statement.
That's a blatant lie. It's always been a lie. The wingnuts know it's a lie. And that makes any of them who repeats it a liar. And do you know how I can prove it's a lie? Because Gingrich and Lott actually voiced support of Clinton's 1998 cruise missile attacks against terrorists in Sudan and Afghanistan. (Clinton's reference to the vast right-wing conspiracy on Fox refers to the so-called-liberal media funded by Richard Mellon Scaife who inundated the airwaves with snippets from the movie Wag The Dog.)
Ask for more links if you want. Jay, Ron, and I and many other intelligent and informed posters her have refuted your blatant Clinton lies until our fingers are suffering from cramps.
Folks, I learned today that Game suffers from OCD: Obsessive Clenis Disorder, that is being obsessed with Bill Clinton's penis.
Game cannot see the truth because his vision is either obscured or blurred by Clinton's penis. His answer to any national political issue is Clinton's penis.
(Game's going to say I'm crazed like they say Clinton was crazed on Fox. BFD)
I see the Democrat hacks are out. Clinton did nothing as a President, was corrupt, and now is mad because the people see him for the putz he is, except Liberal Democrats who want their power back.
Clinton calculates everything he does. Anyone who says different is a liar. Jim, you are a professional liar.
Jim,
Patterico refuted your blasted lies any you disappeared. I gave the link, you gave nothing but Clintonista Bushwa.
Nothing like a Clinton thread to bring out all the dipshits and clue-less wannabes. Way to reuse all the jingo jargon the Bushies and robots at Faux News spit out to you, pcd. All we need is buzz on here to tell us the same line he repeats over several threads and after multiple responses just to show how lacking in understanding neocons are. Wait a sec, is that a neocon taking? I thought I saw some dude in a suits lips moving....
rhyno, thanks for showing you can't refute anything with your crap filled mind, closed eyes, and closed ears. Clinton lied on FNC. He got caught and blew you and the rest of you Clintonistas out of the water. I can add the link here from the other thread if you are helpless at navigating, but I don't think you'll bother. You'll just lie to yourself and others about Clinton not lying and that he's the greatest (piece of living crap of a) President walking the Earth.
You criticize others for bloviating. I see you do nothing but bloviate.
And you have no other tactic than to be insulting to others. This won't get you very far in general, much less get any real point you may have (I still have yet to see a valid point behind all that hate you spread?).
Wow, Clinton lobbed some missles that did nothing...
You better never criticize bush for what he does in the middle east, Jim, since you have such a low standard for successful military opperations
From what I've read lately, waging illegal wars on the rest of the world isn't doing a helluva lot, either.
Even more here.
I should have said even more NOT.
To add to that, the perpetrators in the WTC attack in '93 at least are in jail because of Clinton's actions. The Bush administration can't even tell if the ones they go after are dead or not, much less in jail.
Again, this topic/argument is getting very very old.
Let's pick another one, shall we?
if liberals theory that military action is correct, that it makes more terrorist...why was 9-11 planned while clinton was president?
Why was a major terror organization created?
Dedanna,
What illegal wars? Is the only legal war you know of is class warfare within the US?
The Iraq war is legal. There never was a formal termination of the first Gulf War, and Saddam kept on shooting. Libs like you can't deal with truth. You just keep changing the definitions of words, terms, if not outright rewriting history to ensure delusions are correct.
Oh, Dedanna, OBL was a co-conspirator to the 93 attack. If Gorelick hadn't been so zealous to keep everything about this attack sealed and within the jurisdiction of a court, the Intelligence establishment and Clinton would have known that there was ample justification to Extradite OBL from the Sudan when they offered him to us.
Y'know what, pcd? I'm not even going to dignify you with a response, because you don't even know what you're talking about. As game knows, I'm not a liberal. I just call things as they are. You're not worth my time or effort, you know so little.
come on dedanna, don't copy and paste, you ignored my legit comment
Which is what? The same old tired, very tired one?
Of course I'm going to ignore that. You've run it into the ground too much.
If you're referring to the last post you made in this thread, then of course I'm going to ignore that.
Those things were in existence LONG before Clinton or Bush either one. There was a lot that Clinton did do about the situation that you don't even realize (not defending him, just stating facts). It's not worth going into now, as this subject has been well too worn.
I am not liberal. You call it what you want, but it's not liberal.
There were things about Clinton too, that I didn't like, but I'm at least objective enough to say so. Can you do the same with GWBush? That's the thing about solidly toting party line, Game. One loses their objectivity, therefore ability to lose the brain.
There have been several times when I've disagreed with everyone here, because I see things as they are, and don't look through rose-colored political party glasses. I'd like to see you do the same just once. This is why I am affiliated with the party I am.
This is the one and only time you'll see me defend myself to anyone, or attempt to justify my general position. There should be no need for me to.
pcd need not reply -- as a matter of fact, as wrong as he/she/it is most of the time, I'd rather he didn't. He's a waste of blog space.
I've asked here several times....what was CLinton supposed to do about OBL? Why was he supposed to go psycho like Bush? If it was USS Cole, then Bush failed. He did nothing until after 9/11. If its because of 9/11, then Clinton did no wrong. He did the same as Bush. Either way, you're a tool to figure its all him. Quick, go bite the pillow. Here comes a rugged Conservative....
All we need is buzz on here to tell us the same line he repeats over several threads and after multiple responses just to show how lacking in understanding neocons are. Wait a sec, is that a neocon taking? I thought I saw some dude in a suits lips moving....
Wow -- top billing again!
As regards multiple responses: I believe my contrasting of Jesus and Mohammed appears in exactly ONE thread, though I could be wrong. As far as that goes, I sometimes feel the need to reiterate easily understood points that remain unrefuted.
Oh ... I'm a long-haired, tight-jeaned Metallion!
Biting the pillow sounds a little soft. Would you agree? lol.
I bitch about Bush when I feel it necessary, and there have been times...I just ripped the Republican candidate for gov of WI a few days ago. I feel I am objective.
And I agree that bitching about what a failure clinton was really doesn't do anything, but I feel like doing it because there are those who come here who walk the party line and can't even agree to no-brainers
Dedanna,
Liberal is as Liberal does.
An intersesting point is how Democrats and especially Liberals gave Clinton a pass on Travelgate. Not only did Clinton sweepout long time employees who were mostly Democrats, he tried to get them convicted of felonies to cover the FACT that Clinton was putting his cousin in charge of the White House Travel Office.
Liberals do not respect success or being self made. Evidence is how they ripped Billy Dale for having a vacation home that was worth some money. Hey, he scrimped and saved for that home which he earned, Can we say the same for the Clintons?
Scorpion says---
Maybe Bozo Bill could have made Monica available to appease and help ease the tension.
Post a Comment