Saturday, September 16, 2006

These people love this country?

Wow, these people did their homework.
Rosie said something completely ridiculous this week, and she is a big lime Lefty....
So, the GOP is using it to their benefit.
I love the strategy. All you have to do is keep using liberals own words to show the American people they do not think like the average American.

Does the average American think like this:

Rep. Pelosi Said Capturing Osama Bin Laden Would Not Make U.S. "Safer." Rep. Pelosi: "And even to capture [Osama Bin Laden] now, I don't think, makes us any safer." (Fox News', "Special Report," 9/8/06)

Click Here To Watch Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) Say Catching Osama Bin Laden Would Not Make Us Any Safer.
Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) Claimed American Soldiers Were "Terrorizing" Kids And Children: "[T]here is no reason ... that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children ..." (CBS' "Face The Nation," 12/4/05)

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) Compared American's Treatment Of Detained Terrorists To Nazi Germany: "If I ... did not tell you that it was an FBI Agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners [at Guantanamo] in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their Gulags, or some mad regime, Pol Pot, or others that had no concern for human beings. Sadly, that is not the case. This was the action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners." (Sen. Richard Durbin, Congressional Record, 6/14/05 p. S6594)

Democrat Senate Candidate Ned Lamont (D-CT) Says It Is Time To Bring Troops Home "Now": "I think it's time for us to take our front-line military operations and start bringing those troops home now." (Susan Haigh, "Iraq War Key Topic Of Senate Race," The Associated Press, 6/17/06)

"The View's" Rosie O'Donnell Claims Radical Christianity "Just As Threatening" As Radical Islam And Says U.S. "Bombing" Innocent People:

Rosie O'Donnell: "Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America where we have separation of church and state." (ABC's "The View," 9/13/06)

Rosie O'Donnell: "And as a result of the [9-11] attack and the killing of 3,000 innocent people, we invaded two countries and killed innocent people ..." (ABC's "The View," 9/13/06)

Then you had GWB getting very upset in a press conference about the fact that some people think that America is no better than terrorist who cut people's heads off....and which side constantly attacks our military and says nothing about Arab terrorists?

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I saw that press conference. What he got upset about was being called out on his lies in front of everyone. Then, being the coward that he is, he completely non-answered most questions except those handed to Faux News. Err, I mean asked by and researched by Fox News.

jhbowden said...

Good work Game.

Liberals think *we* are the problem, not the global Islamist movement. That is why Rosie, Pelosi, rhyno and others say the things they do.

Western decadence, plain and simple.

Anonymous said...

Me decadent? Hardly. Rosie decadent? Ridiculous. Cons are A problem. Liberals who try and force everyone into their way of thinking are another. Anyone who thinks they have a right to control other people because they are in a position of authority IS the problem in this country. Too much gov't, too many people thinking they are right, not enough repsect for other people to make their own decisions.

In reply to jason, the Islamist movement is a problem, but people like you or Queen Bush are definately not the solution. It only make sit worse. Since most Cons seem to be composed of more pride than balls or brains, this is easy to see. The solution is simple. Declare any state harboring a terrorist group to be complicate in their crimes. Declare any populous who doesnt seek to expel said terrorists as complicate in their crimes. When you have both, annihilation. It has to include all instances. Douchebags like Bush will never make a bold statement like this cuz he is a dirty crook, a coward and a liar. He is more than happy to bite the pillow while rich Muslim countries pound him up the ass. So long as they leave a nice tip. "We arent the Islam you are looking for..." *WAVES HAND*

jhbowden said...

rhyno--

I understand your position completely. You want negotiation and diplomacy with the most violent elements, and you want to stab the lesser of two evils in places like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia in the back.

In short, you would prefer events to spiral out-of-control rather than have them remain in control.

Thanks for making yourself clear.

Jim said...

Thanks for making the case, Jason. Saddam was under control and much less a threat than the Saudis who flew into the WTC or the Pakastanis who support bin Laden, al Qaeda, and the Taliban.

Saudi oil money does immeasurably more to support terrorism and hatred of America than Saddam could have done in his wildest dreams. And the Pakastanis, who HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS, are certainly more likely to give them to al Qaeda and the Taliban than Saddam, who saw OBL, al Qaeda and the Taliban as a threat, NOT an ally.

The Game said...

I have to agree saudi probably does as much crappy stuff as Iraq did, but their leaders play the game better, so they get away with it

Jim said...

That's it? Wow, I fell much better!

Actually the Saudis not only play the game better, they are long time friends and business partners of the Bush family. And that's not a "theory."

Ron said...

Actually I agree with most all of the statements in the post. The fact that you twist it into a hate america instead of a holding our own country accountable to its higher ideals is proof how far you and like have slipped into the nasty sticky muck and how little you care about Americas highest ideals.