Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Foley: The Democratic Playbook

Here's Dems' playbook:
1. Pay no heed to the distinction between the e-mails and IMs. There's no evidence (yet) that any Republican leaders knew about Foley's cybersex IMs. There's plenty of evidence that they knew how uncomfortable the "overly friendly" e-mails made at least one page. So the Dems will press the GOP on what they knew about the former and will constantly, in their press releases, refer to the "GOP's knowledge of the sexually explicit e-mails."
2. Enlarge the wedge between House leaders. The tension this weekend between Speaker Dennis Hastert and NRCC chair Tom Reynolds was thick. Dems want it to suffocate the party and throw the Republicans even further off their game.
3. Be aggressive about how Dems will -- and are -- protecting children. Dems want to keep the issue poisonous in a way that's clear and direct to middle America. (In other words: this ain't earmarks.)
4. Choose unimpeachable spokespeople to be their public face. The DCCC has enlisted Patty Wetterling, its candidate for MN 06, to call for "a thorough investigation" of the House leadership over Foley. Wetterling's son, Jacob, was kidnapped in 1989.
5. Deride the Republicans for incompetence. How can you possibly trust them with national security if you can't trust them with your own children?
6. Bring up Terri Schiavo's case and compare the heated GOP attention back then to their allegedly lax attention to the welfare of their pages.
7. Compare what the GOP leadership says about Foley with what Republicans said about Jack Abramoff.
8. Use the Foley cash. Already, the DSCC wonders why George Allen didn't immediately return the Foley. The quotable Phil Singer: “It is more than a little disturbing that Allen apparently sees nothing wrong with holding on to contributions he got from an adult who has been caught sending sexually explicit email to children." Allen and Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) will return the cash. But the NRCC already spent the $550K and won't.

5 comments:

PCD said...

Excuse me, Bill Clinton was a serial sexual harasser, but the Democrats eagerly seek his support for fundraising.

jhbowden said...

Now Dems are engaging in gay-bashing to "protect the children." Is there no limit to their hypocrisy?

jhbowden said...

Jim--

The age of consent in the District of Columbia, to my knowledge, is 16. Democrats have been promoting homosexuality and have been trying to lower the age of consent everywhere. Like, free love, man. Groovy!

Now you're trying to bash one of the great liberal mascots, the homosexual, in a desperate attempt to score political points.

Unbelievable.

PCD said...

Jim, David Corn has posted about a list of Gays your people are threatening to out in a bid to keep the social conservatives from voting. Once again, you are lying on this site in your postings.

Dedanna said...

I don't know myself, but do know that we could say that Foley sucks. Literally.