This is one of those stories were you just have to laugh...
Dem's have been quoted calling Bush and US troops Nazi's...
Republicans are NeoCons, racists, homophobes, ect...
Dem's love this page of the playbook
They do certain things all the time....but when the Right actually does it back, they scream and yell...they should change their name to the hypocrisy party...It has been proven over and over here that they are just that...
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Rep. Murtha Blasts GOP for Name-Calling
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
12 comments:
Please provide ANY link to a Democrat of note and influence who has called Bush and US troops Nazi's.
I believe that's a false claim.
And anyone with any intelligence understands that there is a difference between suggesting that someone uses the same tactics as Nazis and calling them Nazis.
BTW, I thought being a neocon was a GOOD thing for you guys.
And please provide ANY PROOF whatsoever that the Republic party who will soon embrace Bush's plan to reduce and redeploy troops after calling Democrats advocating the same the "party of cut and run" are ANY LESS hypocritical than you claim the Democrats to be.
You are simply a gratuitous liberal basher. Apparently that's all you've got.
Game. This seems to be a popular matter of discussion on both sides these days.
As noted here..
Jim, I thought they were proud to be neocons too. I'm Confused. If they wanted to be true conservatives you think they would start acting and talking like one.
Jim, you ignorant sl...
You've GOT to be kidding. No links are required for this absolute truth. The only difference between calling one a Nazi and suggesting that someone uses the same tactics as Nazis is that one of the two actually has a pair. But the inference is crystal clear. Nice try there, though.
It's not a matter of whether or not being a neocon is a good thing, it's the fact that it is a term the left uses with utter contempt, like when a chick calls her husband a "man". She means something specific, and it ain't good.
Where there IS a difference is when a label is placed appropriately and when it isn't. Typically, the libs falsely accuse and the cons are saying what is. If that's lib bashing, consider yourself bashed.
I think marshall took care of it, nothing more to add..
jim, you know who I am talking about in regards to the nazi thing..and marshall is right on that one too
The cons falsely accuse at least as much as the libs. They falsely accuse them of being unpatriotic, they falsely accuse them of supporting the terrorists, they falsely accuse them of being against electronic surveillance, they falsely accuse them of Christian bashing, they falsely accuse them of wanting to raise taxes for the middle classes. And much, much more.
It shouldn't take much intelligence to understand the difference between how a group (such as the Nazis) came into power and what they did with it when they got it. If you can't understand that, I'm at a loss.
Jim--
My Senator, Richard Turban, ahem, Durbin, implied that our soldiers were Nazis.
I made my contribution to the Republican National Committee today, and damn it felt good. Republicans aren't perfect, but I'm sick and tired of liberals that hate our Republic.
Of course we understand it, Jim. We understand the parallels between now and then and it doesn't seem to mesh with your perception. This much is true. We see the Islamosfascists as being today's Nazi's and the actions of the left being today's Chamberlains in the manner in which they view the threat. Your side likes to view the administration as another fascist entity that is taking away rights, which it hasn't and isn't, and using Muslims as our version of the Jews. This is not true as we are not concerned with Islam but with radical Islamists. (Personally I think the religion is crap, but they are more than free to believe what they want as long as they aren't trying to blow me up.)
I think it's appropriate to question the patriotism of those whose "peace at any cost" stance results in attacks against the motives of the president, ala Cindy Sheehan and her ilk, leaks to the press, as in the numerous NY Times articles describing our surveillance strategies, and other such nonsense. At the least, seditionist is a good word. These types of actions and rhetoric does indeed become support for the terrorists as it gives them hope that our will is weak, thus steeling their resolve. No one argues that the left is against surveillance, but that they are against the methods adopted by this admin to enhance their ability to fight terrorism. They purposely distort the intention of those strategies by using expressions such as "domestic spying". We justly acknowledge the Christian bashing and David Limbaugh's book, "Persecution" exhaustively catalogues examples to support it. The ACLJ and other such legal organizations can also testify to it. We justly accuse the left of wanting to raise taxes, period. Doesn't matter on whom. We frankly don't trust the left to define middle class the same way from year to year. With the next "cause" they will adjust that definition and more folks will be taxed. We also don't trust that they won't tax the middle class in any case since raising taxes is the answer for them to most every problem. This is far from a false accusation.
Jason,
I have a real problem calling him "my" Senator, but I prefer to call him "Pencil" Dick Durbin. There's some name calling for ya!
Dick Durbin did no such thing. It's a lie, it's been shown to be a lie, and anyone who repeats it is lying.
Durbin recited the description by an FBI agent of the conditions of prisoners held by the United States. Durbin implied that the conditions were deplorable.
You inferred, incorrectly, that he was calling US soldiers Nazis. He did not. Everybody knows he did not. You should know he did not.
Marshall: It's not a matter of whether or not being a neocon is a good thing, it's the fact that it is a term the left uses with utter contempt
Oh you mean the way you use the word liberal.
Jim,
You are psychotic. Sen. Dick Dirtbag did call are troops Nazi and refused to apologize for it. Just shows how much YOU will lie.
Hell, I've called Bush a Nazi, and I'm not a Dem. I'm not going to deny a damned thing, because that's what I think he & his cronies are, is a bunch of communists, with Bush as the head dictator (or is it Cheney?), for more than one reason. But then, I'd probably say the same for a Dem leader right now, too. I've said it before that I think they're all the same anyway. I have yet to see anyone really different than the rest in office.
Post a Comment