Just wondering...which party do you think this guy voted for?
Inner city of Milwaukee...I think we know the answer
He was just apart of the 2% or so that Democrats gain in every election due to voter fraud.
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Felon charged with voting 4 times
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
34 comments:
Looks like someone else is about to get charged with voting illegally. I especially like this part:
a letter was sent to [her] on March 27 requesting that she clarify her address for the voting records "or face the possibility of her voter registration being rescinded." Three more letters were sent to [her] and her attorney, but she has yet to respond with the information requested
Aren't the Republicans in Milwaukee right now making a big to-do over letters that go unanswered and so forth? Wonder why this one gets such easy treatment . . .
Maybe because Republicans wait for proof of wrongdoing before raggin on the accused. We hear it's the American way.
Tell that to the people on your side, then, Marshall. You're all ready to purge voters who won't return their cards when they live in Milwaukee, but not if they're high-profile Republicans. Sad.
Jay,
So, you don't like Ann Coulter and I'm sure you'd like to see her permanently disenfranchised. Only thing is that the voting official involved is doing this for the publicity in the media to make political points.
Now, why do you support vote fraud by the Democrats? Do you think Democrats have a right to office no matter how few Democrats there are?
why do you support vote fraud by the Democrats?
When did you stop beating your wife?
don't worry, jay has nothing.
the obvious and proven vote fraud in milwaukee county alone by dem's is clear to anyone who can think honestly...but jay is a liberal school teacher, so that must be very hard for him
do you need a list of all the vote fraud in Milwaukee AGAIN...
I'll give you a quick taste:
1. tire slashing
2. smokes for votes
3. dem groups signing up people in 2004 who had improper ID and many who put down an address that was not even there...
4. 10,000 more votes than voters
5. felons voting
6. voting twice
7. picking people up at 7 on busses in the inner city and paying them 10 bucks to vote for people who have not voted yet
I think that is enough
Jay,
You are just the type of dishonest person who should be barred from teaching.
I'm beginning to wonder if the police need to get a search warrant for Jay's home and computer to see if there is evidence that he participates in the Democrat Vote Fraud Machine.
I don't think I would go that far...
Jay is either:
1. a "true-believer" as many teachers are...meaning thay really believe in the failed liberal ideas that have created a permanent underclass
or
2. intellectually dishonest and simply has the hate that many liberals do for conservatives and the cruel world.
Game,
I don't want teachers from 1 or 2 teaching children. They are one component in what is wrong with the modern schools.
Can you show me any public school where the students can pass the lessons in a McGuffy reader? Then, how many of those schools have student pass the McGuffy at the grade level the book was written for?
Sure marshall. Pubs are all just a bunch of quiet, strong types, right? Please....
...and I thought I had the most ignorant possible from you.
Sure Rhyno, whatever you say. But when it is proven that Coulter is doing anything wrong, we'll comment then. It might be enough for the likes of you to string someone up on mere accusation, but we prefer proof before doing so. What's so ignorant about that? Or do you have a different definition of the word? I know that last line was risky considering libs redefine as is necessary to win an argument.
Just how honest are Jay, Jim, and rhyno? Read this post, follow the links and then ask the three of them how they can complain about Ann Coulter, one person, yest ignore the thousands of fraudulent voter registrations and provisional votes filed by ACORN and other Democrats?
http://www.iowavoice.com/index.php?/archives/2942-ACORN-Workers-Indicted-For-Voter-Fraud.html
Logically, a party that must resort to such massive and orchestrated vote fraud can not be a majority that can win elections fairly and are desperate and dishonest to the core.
Kills me... seen about 10 liberal bloggers today already harping on the evils of Ddiebold. If for some reason they don't win on Tuesday we know what refrain we'll be hearing... over and over again.
Yawn.
liberals have a different standard for their onw...it is sicking and tiring...
pcd, you must have some kind of disorder.
First of all, you seem to have some kind of compulsive disorder that makes you think that, just because I don't begin every single one of my comments with a fiery condemnation of Democrats for something or other that I must condone illegal behavior. I do not. If you were a regular reader of my blog (as all should be), you'd know that I have supported vote fraud prosecutions and that, in fact, I was the first blogger (liberal or conservative) in Milwaukee to condemn the tire slashings on election day 2004. I came into this post because the Game made a completely unfounded assumption that a man who was (quite rightly) convicted for violations of voting laws must have been a Democrat. I responded to that unfounded assumption with two completely fact-based points: One, that the Game's favorite leggy columnist is herself under investigation for fraudulent voting, and two, that what she's done--not responded to voting officials' requests for information--is exactly what thousands of Milwaukee residents did when their voting status was challenged by the Republican Party in 2004.
Second, you seem irony challenged. You made an unfounded assumption of your own--that I support vote fraud if perpetrated by Democrats--and I responded by asking you the wife-beating question. The "when did you stop beating your wife?" question is the archetypal question of the sort that you asked me--a question that implies that I do or did something that I do not do and never have. Your "why do you support vote fraud by the Democrats?" question is insulting and shows nothing but your ignorance, for anyone, as I mentioned, with even the sparest knowledge about what I've written over the past two years knows that I do not cotton to fraud perpetrated by anyone, on either side.
Now, an irony deficiency and a sad little bit of OCD or Liberal Derangement Syndrome isn't going to kill you. But your lies, your outrageous and unsupported accusations, make you look stupid and foolish. Maybe Marshall or the Game take you seriously. But I don't. I can't--if you don't know the first thing about me and yet feel brave enough to lie about what I believe, you don't even deserve the courtesy of the decidedly restrained response I've given you here.
And, furthermore, you may feel free to cast aspersions on my teaching. But until a single one of you volunteers to come sit in on my classes or ask any of my supervisors or former students (my evaluations, as are the Game's, are available to the public) about the quality of my work, you also tread on dangerously libelous--not to mention rhetorically stupid--territory.
Stick to what you all seem to know: making up stuff about liberals (besides me) and blind obedience to anyone claiming to be a Republican.
Jay,
You have a mental disease, being a liberal.
You also have a problem with freedom of speech, and probably a few more freedoms accorded me by the Constitution and bill of rights.
As for your problem with the challenging of voters in Milwaukee, I would believe that there were fraudulent registrations, voting for those not having voted by Democrat hacks, and the usual carting around homeless to multiple precincts to vote Democrat.
You want to defend that with your victim mentality and rants, fine.
I will call you an arrogant bastard for thinking that EVERY one has to read your rants, er blogs.
As for NEA goons like yourself, I've seen how you teach for the exams without really teaching, leaving most of the class behind because you teach to one narrow segment of the class and ignore the rest.
I've seen Educational supervisors in CYA mode attack the parents to protect the school's shoddiest teachers.
Can parents drop in unanounced to your class? Let me save you the tap dance. The answer is no. You have to be tipped off to allow you to sanitize your lesson plan for the day and to get your hate bush literature out of your desk before the parents/public arrives.
pcd,
I don't have a problem with freedom of speech. Your right to speak freely, however, ends when you start libeling someone.
Is your head made of duct tape? Because nothing seems to be penetrating. Maybe your computer monitor has some kind of virus--that's perhaps the most reasonable explanation here--that turns all the words I actually type into the words you want to see instead. Because I don't understand how anyone with the basic skills to read English, which you seem to possess, could get what you apparently got from what I wrote. Let me number the lies:
1. The free speech one, as above. (I'm not counting the mental disease line, as that's clearly hyperbole--and poor debatiing skills on your part.)
2. My "problem" with challenging voters in Milwaukee. I don't have a problem with that. If there are old, bad, or fraudulent voter registrations, well, that needs to be cleaned up. My "problem" is with the way you, Marshall, and the Game seem not to see the hypocrisy in your words about Ann Coulter. If the Republicans are willing to challenge thousands of potentially bad voters in the Democratic city of Milwaukee, why is asking Ann Coulter to clarify her voter status a partisan witch hunt?
3. I "defend [voter fraud] with [my] victim mentality and rants." I don't. I never have. I will PayPal you $100 if you can find anywhere on my blog or elsewhere on the internet one example of my defending a single fraudulent vote. I was, in fact, the first liberal Milwaukee blogger to demand that alleged double-voter and Democrat Donovan Riley drop out of his primary race. That's another specific example to add to the ones I provided before. If, knowing that your words about me are mere cartoon images of who you think a stereotypical liberal is, you continue to insist on pushing your lies, then you are a characterless goon yourself.
4. I "teach for the exams without really teaching." The only exams I "teach for" are the International Baccalaureate exams that my students take--the IB is the most prestigious accelerated pre-university program in the world. Other "NEA goons" may "teach for" the state tests, but I think the high-stakes testing game is the fault of someone other than the teachers unions, Democrats, or liberals. Look in the mirror.
5. I "teach to one narrow segment of the class and ignore the rest." I like how you're so sure of this without ever having seen me teach. But, FYI, I don't do this, either. It's getting harder now with my class sizes in the 40s, but I do pre-test my students and individualize the reading and grammar instruction for all of my students to the best of my ability.
6. That parents can't "drop in unanounced" to my class." I love it when parents drop in. I wish more would. I often invite them when I talk to them on the phone. When I can find a valid phone number (the Game knows what I'm talking about).
7. I have to "sanitize" my lessons and I keep "hate Bush literature" in or on my desk. Sorry, but I take my job seriously, and I actually recognize that as one of Wisconsin's highest-profile bloggers I need to be extra careful about what I say and do in class. My students don't know I blog. They don't know who I will vote for. They don't know what I think of the president. Maybe you walk around your job in a "Hillary sucks" t-shirt or you try to talk up your coworkers about how hot Bush looks in a flightsuit, but that's not the way I do my job.
Want to try more? You're a lying scoundrel. You think perhaps that internet anonymity gives you greater freedom to engage in libel or be an ass. (No, that's not a threat to out you. I could give a shit, because a libel suit against you is probably not worth my time.)
But from now on, every time you engage in an argument on this or other sites I read with a liberal and throw around your smug little assumptions about how liberals all must think and act, I will point people to this thread, so they can all see that you're a liar and a weasel.
Every time you assume you have credibility about something, I will link to this thread so people can see that you just pull stuff out of thin air and act superior no matter how wrong you are.
Every time you demand an apology from all liberals for some real or imagined slight by one of us that we don't know, have never met, and couldn't give two shakes about, I will send people to this thread, and ask why you never apologized for being a lying jerk.
See where I'm going with this? You've stepped in it, Mr. Packer City Dan, and you can keep walking around in it or you can realize it stinks and change.
out of everything jay said, the thing that stuck out at me was the fact that he once again said I simply agree with everything republians say...
that does make me question your mental abilities, your ability to observe and learn...
Jay, your argument is eloquent but wasted. If you provide logical debate and reliable citations, you are regarded as "a waste of time".
As far as you know who, I advise ignoring him. He has nothing whatsoever of value to contibute. Don't respond to someone who merely pollutes this space.
Its typical of Cons like pcd and marshall. All bluff and no balls. They will sit here and spew garbage, ad nauseum, because they arent in a forum that allows for cross examination of their false factual statements, or bogus logic. That doesnt mean people dont do it, but they ignore such details and merely continue to desire to listen to themselves. Sadly, they are too stupid or thick-headed to even see the poison and falsehoods in themselves. Another solid Con trait.
Rhyno, Projecting your personal faults once again.]
Jim, you are proven to be a lying tool of the Democrats.
Jay, Don't be surprised if I don't walk in your class. Arrogance such as yours needs deflation.
Also, MY daughter graduated with a 4.0, validictorian of her high school, tested a 1550 on the SAT and 33 on the ACT, just graduated from USC's school of Cinema and Television Cum Laude in the Thematic course of study, the hardest USC has.
What have your children or students or children done??
Oh, and Jay, I was in Who's Who American High School students once only because I didn't turn in the forms for a repeat appearance the next year. My daughter appeared two years in a row.
OMG, pcd! I didn't know your issue was so smart! I guess that does give you the right to lie and libel all over the internet!
Jay, just like you and Jim do for the Democrats.
Getting back to the main subject, why the Hell do you think pointing out Ann Coulter gives you Democrats absolution to stuff the ballot box? Why are you so afraid of producing the same ID you use for cashing a check to vote?
Also, why does the National Democrat party try to disenfranchise Military voters? They claim to support the troops. How is robbing them of their fundamental right to vote, which some of them are dying for to defend, supporting them and supportive of democratic principles?
why the Hell do you think pointing out Ann Coulter gives you Democrats absolution to stuff the ballot box?
Wow, again, pcd. Your "Who's Who" status has clearly given you extra mental abilities. You were able to read something I never wrote!
Or perhaps its just your fabulist (not fabulous) mind at work.
And I'd also like to know how you think showing ID would have stopped the man in question (the Game actually had a real "main subject" to this post) from voting. Please explain that to me. And use small words, because I only got a 1430 on my SAT and a 32 on my ACT.
jay,
those tests are racist, you should have not taken them
"And I'd also like to know how you think showing ID would have stopped the man in question.."
That's an easy one, Mr. 1430. Obviously, along with picture ID, which would most likely have address info, the name would most likely be marked as having already voted (after he had actually done so). You can only be listed in the precinct where you live, and your ID would reflect that. Thus, he would be told to leave, or maybe even held by authorities for attempted vote fraud for trying to vote multiple times. If he tried to vote in another precinct, his name would not be on the list. Or was that a trick question?
Marshall, the man in question only voted once in each election, under his own name (that's how the authorities figured it out) in the appropriate polling place. Did you read the story at all?
What made it illegal was that he was felon on probation, something his driver's license wouldn't indicate. A voter ID law wouldn't have changed a thing.
Thank you, Jay. You said everything I've been thinking about PCD from the get-go, and the reason(s) I've ignored him practically from the get-go.
I just think it's funny that he calls the kettle black.
Eh, well, time to move on and pretend that someone isn't here that is doing nothing more than taking up blog space.
A word from the wise:
Those who don't appreciate words from certain people should literally pretend they're not there. If you respond to anything they say at all, you add fuel to the fire, give them more to come back to, and you eventually run the risk of making yourself look as bad as they do (although I don't think that happened here). If you don't respond, then they stand with their stupidity, arrogance, etc. on their own, in their own words, and it shows for everyone to see, with nothing coming back on you. Let what they say stand on its own, ok? They need nothing more to look as they do.
I stand corrected Mr. Bullock. I didn't read the article this time and got burned assuming I knew the content by the headline. You may take your shots. I have them coming.
Please, not the face.
Post a Comment