Stories about "peace" protesters destroying property once again brings to light the hypocrisy in the entire liberal thought process. We should rename them the "do as I say, not as I do" crowd.
They either understand everything they sad is emotional, hysterical crap that deep down they don't even believe in...or they believe in it but don't have to integrity, responsibility and the guts to follow through on their own beliefs.
They either understand everything they sad is emotional, hysterical crap that deep down they don't even believe in...or they believe in it but don't have to integrity, responsibility and the guts to follow through on their own beliefs.
Here is another picture of liberals "supporting the troops" America, when are you going to get tired of all the liberal lies...they do it because they think you are stupid, and until you stop believing what comes out of their mouth, I guess they are correct
It has been shown time and time again.
So which is it?
Do liberals just say things to get attention and to satisfy their emotional urges?
or
Do they believe what they sad but for some reason are unable to live out their philosophy?
Posts
19 comments:
Most of these liberals are mentally Ill, Game. Look at Jay and Jim. Every shred of their persona and character is shreaded away by their slavish dedication to support the Democrat party.
I wouldn't put jay and jim at the top of the liberal mental disorder group...unless those guys preach environmentalism then have an SUV or a summer home...
or if they pretend to "support the troops" then destroy a recruitment center and burn a doll soldier
But true, liberals are feeling more confident to show their true colors. If they acted like this during election time they wouldn't win a damn thing...late this year or early next year they will calm down and start acting more like conservatives so they can get elected...
game,
Using Jay and Jim as prime examples, look at their behavior concerning the Duke travesty. Neither can denounce Nifong or denounce the 88 Liberal professors who persecuted the Lacrosse team members after holding their own Kangaroo Court. Jay is especially deficient.
Jay can't answer a simple question about how much of his contributions here are mere cut and paste jobs of crap from Daily Kos, a blog he admits spending considerable time reading and posting on, one of those liberal blogs where dissent is not allowed.
Wonder what would happen if a bunch of masked people went and demolished the Wisconsin dem head quarters to express our "frustration" with their leader, diamond jim?
They'd be screaming "hate crime" faster than you can say aclu.
Since none of the resident libs are answering this, let me give it a shot.
It’s all about emotion. The whole liberal/socialist movement is about emotion. Pick any liberal cause, and at its root is an appeal to the emotions.
And since most libs are emotional it’s easier to lose themselves in the heat of the moment, become mob like and justify their actions with self-righteous anger. To do otherwise would require restraint, and I think even the most fanatical lib would admit that’s a quality they lack.
So the answer is “they believe what they say”, but they’re so full of self-righteousness they’re unable to examine the actual consequences of their beliefs or the hypocrisy of their actions.
I’m right, I know I’m right; therefore I’m justified in doing whatever’s necessary.
These aren't liberals in my book or in the way I consider myself a liberal. That is what galls me about you guys. You decide on your own definition and then try to push it off on everybody you don't like. If these people are liberals and we are associated then I will be happy to say you all as conservatives share all the values of Pat Robertson, Anne Coulter, The KKK and right wing fascism. It would be nice to discuss things with someone that didn't wake up in the morning looking forward to finding new ways to hate. Shit you can see the spiddle running down pcds chin in every post he makes. Glad we can provide you with some entertainment and joy in life. You guys are sad.
Ron,
Way to defend your moonbats, with rage and spittle running down YOUR chin.
You said noting about how wrong YOUR people are, nor did you prove that they weren't LIBs, Democrats, etc. You just attacked. Hello, Mr. Pot.
thanks for making my point
Sorry Ron, but it was the "peace" activists who are hateful
Over at "Right Voices", commenter Former Artillery Officer, made a very telling comment:
"FrmrArtyOffcr Said:
On March 21, 2007 - 10:44 PM
We had anti military protesters on campus when I was in ROTC. One of my fellow cadets did a survey of the cadet corps on their reactions to the protesters for a sociology class. When the instructors heard my response, they loved it. I simply told the truth that since they didn’t have the courage to say anything to my face unless there were 15 of them or behind my back within earshot unless there were at least 5 of them, I felt no reason to even respond to such cowards. These are a pathetic example of how far down the path to destruction this country has gone. These morons fail to realize a few simple facts:
The reporter doesn’t insure freedom of the press, the soldier does.
The orator doesn’t insure freedom of speech, the soldier does,
The organizer doesn’t insure freedom of assembly, the soldier does.
The religious leader doesn’t insure freedom of religion, the soldier does.
Without the soldiers who have fought and died to preserve these freedoms since this country was founded, these freedoms would not exist. Had the soldiers decided to quash these freedoms, they would not exist. Our military protects rights that in many cases they themselves do not enjoy.
In the civilian world, you can be fired for an office romance. In the military you can be court martialed and sent to prison.
For these protesters to act in this manner, while Constitutionally protected, is inexcusable. This is a direct result of the attitude that as long as you have a right to do something, you have no responsibility for the results of doing it. Why else do the liberals want to disarm law abiding citizens, but allow violent criminals to run our streets after repeated convictions? "
I think FAO speaks to the heart of this act and the problem with Liberals. In their silence, Liberal Democrats egg on these moonbats and they think the 1st amendment protects them from the consequences of their speech, but they cannot speak except from the shadows, in mobs, or from Kangaroo Courts as the Duke Professors did. As long as the rank and file Democrats look the other way from these people and from their silent ot encouraging leadership, things will only get worse.
Ron,
For a minute there you almost made a salient point, then you went and ruined it by associating Ann and Pat with the KKK. So lacking and therefore so typical.
But, lets just say for the sake of argument you didn't let emotion take over your thought processes.
The difference is, the conservative fanatics rarely go crazy on a fairly routine basis and destroy property. (and since fantacism is partialy defined by irrational/destructive behavior you could argue there are very few conservative fanatics - in relation to lib/soicalist fanatics)
When the few who claim they are conservative lose it, they are roundly ostracized by the conservative community. That can't be said for the liblooneymooney social cause champions. Ya sure, there are a few libs who chastize them when they feel they must, but most just try to ignore the subject.
Maybe because deep down they applaud them?
Game if they were peace activists they wouldn't be committing random vandalism..is that so hard to understand or are you that hard up to hate an entire group of people. I'm sure you love everything the christian conservatives do?
Blamin..I have no doubt that the vast majority on the left would ostracize these people too. I just did, so did Jim in another post ...but that matters to you not. The fundies are an integral part of the right..do you support all their actions?
To associate the left with Nazis is goofy and shows your lack of understanding of the political spectrum. Do you know the main tenets of Nazis?..Nazi leaders publicly decried pacifism, liberal democracy and humanitarianism ... they approved of national territorial expansion,corporatism and insisted on unquestioning obedience to Nazi tenets. Not the definition of liberal dude and why it is useless to debate people who just mouth Limbaugh et al.
ron--
The national socialist German worker's party was precisely what is advertized.
They thought children belonged to the village, not to families. The Reich opposed free governments and supported tyrannies. And it isn't an accident that the welfare state-- social security, national health care and so forth, was vigorously promoted by the Nazis. The progressive policies of the welfare state were pioneered by Otto von Bismarck's Germany, which in today's parlance would be called a right-wing dictatorship.
Look at the Dems today. In Iraq -- when they aren't opposing democracy, they are indifferent, and many thought it was best to support to the dictator. Dems love giving the government power, and have plans on having a government takeover of the health care sector. And with the family, fugetaboutit-- Dems think the State knows best, not the parents.
You should read Hitler's declaration of war against America. It is a progressive diatribe about Hitler is for peace, how the United States is breaking "international law," and national socialists need to defend themselves against the aggression of the Anglo-American Jewish-Capitalist world. Hitler sounded just like the progressive wackjobs that defend progressives like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, and Saddam Hussein today.
The left isn't pacifist. It simply thinks dictators should have a monopoly on violence, and that free governments should be destroyed.
"... the Terrorist, the Immigrant, the Faggot, the Raghead, and most of all, the Liberal."
This is cute. Let's throw out "the Raghead" because it's just the usual baseless stereotyping of conservatives.
Now we're left with the terrorist, who has sworn to continue his efforts to bring down what we know and love and replace it with Sharia law. Many of us feel that threat is real, since the terrorist continues to prove it, and thus are prepared to take up arms on behalf of the nation and free world in general. Sorry you have a problem with that.
The immigrant is really another slam based on the fantasy of conservative bigotry. You damn well know that the right has no problem with legal immigrants and in fact welcome them to the Melting Pot, particularly if they do some melting. But the illegals are another matter. They are foreign invaders no matter what their intent and it is irresponsible to allow it to continue.
"The Faggot" is a hedonist who insists, like the terrorist, that the nation conforms to his idea of what constitutes right and wrong. He expects the at least 90% who aren't like him to change every they know and love, including Holy Scripture, for the sake of the faggot's preferred means of sexual pleasure. And he will do so with the flimsiest evidence in support of his position, and outright lying.
The left either applauds, supports or enables each of these groups to the detriment of the nation. Accusing the right of having "an insatiable hunger for more slaughter and more wars", is a shameful position to take on the subject. So, shame on you for posting it.
Excellent Marshall! You've hit the head nail again!!!
I'm anxious to see the response to your well reasoned arguments...but I won't hold my breath.
I just checked back in and I don't know who reads this far down but blamin, you will wait for a long time for my arguement. I said, argue all you want but it is the case. It is the case for the 70% that don't see the world like you do. Go ask them! Sometimes I wish Marshall and I could debate separately because at least he acts like an adult and doesn't constantly spew right wing talking points like every single other rightie on this blog. That said I would say he is totally missing the point in his post.
ronnie boy,
I'm not sure what part of Kos's site you get your statistics from, but the majority of Americans lean conservative, just as I do.
John Dean is puppet master. If you believe his sophmoric arguments, then, well 'nuff said.
Ronnie,
I think you proved my original point. The only reason you and Jimmy condemned these ignorant puppets, is because you felt you had no choice in order to retain what little credibility you posses. Where’s the outrage from the libweenie leadership, or self-appointed spokespersons?
Post a Comment