Apparently Jay and other liberals can not even come to terms that inner city voters in McGee's district KNOW that he is a slime ball, yet vote for him anyway...making them a joke to anyone who has a shred of common sense...
I am not the only one who agrees...from the Journal Sentinel:
History tells us two things: McGee will blame everybody else and say he's being persecuted. And the voters in his district will believe him and like him even more
A conviction would cost McGee his seat on the Common Council and land him in prison, but his forgiving constituents may just declare him their alderman in exile. If the cord reaches far enough, he could even keep his radio show in the slammer.
His district deserved better. They just never insisted on it.
We don't need this crud in Milwaukee.
A can't believe ANYONE who considers themselves intelligent would disagree with this...
Editorial: Time to resign
The Milwaukee alderman must do the right thing after his third arrest in a year and a half. Monday's arrest follows an unsuccessful recall election against him.
Won't happen...and Jay, this is how I am correct about Democratic voters. When Dem's get caught, they NEVER resign...because they know if their district is Dem enough, the voters will always vote them in...(DC Mayer, Senator convicted of a sex crime and still re-elected 7 times)...When a conservative (Foley) gets caught, they MUST resign because they know they would lose anyway....
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Theater of the absurd feeds on McGee I, II
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
18 comments:
What do you want me to say? McGee should have been recalled? I've said that. McGee is not the best person to represent that district? I've said that. That he should resign now that he's under indictment? I've said that. McGee should get a fair trial and serve his time if convicted? I've said that.
Look, Tom Barrett (non-partisan mayor, but former Democratic congressman) asked him to resign. Willie Hines (non-partisan Common Council president but, like McGee, representing an area that usually votes for Democrats) stripped him of his committee assignments. No elected official (that I'm aware of, though I am not sucking up the minutiae of this case as some others are) has stood up for him. What more do you want from us?
jay
I think (and I think you know this), Game is making a point about many of those whom vote D.
It's all fine and dandy that certain elected officials say that which is convenient for the press. The fact remains, many Democrat voters never met a felon they didn't like!
Still supporting Cunningham and Libby?
Nope
Damn, I guess that shoots your theory all to hell!
Actually, I've been wondering when the Game will get around to admitting that, yeah, Valerie Plame was covert when the Bush Administration outed her.
ya see Jim
There's something you don't quite comprehend, we Republicans, for the most part, hold our elected officials to a higher standard.
Ya, I know, that's a totally foreign concept to most Dems, but hey, you're in the 1% this comment doesn't apply to - so chill, unless you wish to defend the other 99%.
McGee would get 65 percent of the vote if there were an election tomorrow...and Plame was as covert in her office chair as I am the pope
Oh, and if McGee ran against a white person, he would get 90 percent of the vote
Jay,
What I would like to see from you is an honest admission that the Democrat party is corrupt to the core and needs a house cleaning of its leadership.
Plame was as covert in her office chair as I am the pope
How's that pointy hat feel?
the Democrat party
I'm sorry. I'm not sure what that is. I don't know of any party by that name. Could you try again?
Jay, you are the one with a tin foil hat. You are trumpeting an unpublished and unsupported opinion of the prosecutor as fact??? Oh, I forgot, to far left wing Democrats an accusation or an opinion that condemns a Republican is a fact in stone.
Read this and adjust your tinfoil. It is cutting off the empathic waves from the mothership to you Jay.
http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/30/fitzmas-in-may/
pcd
good link!
Blamin,
You are welcome. Happy you enjoyed it. Use the information in good health.
pcd,
On Plame: I am not trusting Fitzgerald's "opinion." I'm trusting his summary, vetted by the CIA, of Plame's employment history and staus, copied from her personnel files, provided by the CIA. If Libby's attorneys think Fitzgerald's filing is a lie, they will certainly contest it. As far as I know, they have not yet done so.
If you can't accept that appelation
If you can't be bothered to learn the appropriate way to refer to a party, I can't be bothered to respond to you. Essentially, you're calling me childish because you can't bring yourself to type two extra letters. Riiiiight.
Look, I don't run around calling the Republicans "God's Own Party" or "GOoPers" or "Lying Heartless Bastards" or anything else. They call themselves the Republican Party and that's what I call them.
And I don't run around making absurd and unsupportable generalizations about 99% or 90% or any other BS number of Republicans (or "the rest of them" or however you want to phrase it), either. If a Republican is corrupt, indicted, arrested, or just plain being an ass, I don't take it to mean that every Republican, let alone every conservative or everyone who ever voted for any Republican anywhere, is just like that. I take it as meaning that one Republican is like that.
(And I, too, have voted for Republicans.)
jay
OK, I can see where the 1% - 99% Democrats joke might be wearing a little thin.
But, the top two Democratic canidates for president happen to be two of the most Socialist leaning people in the party (that have a chance). Their words and voting records speak for themselves.
Hillary just made a comment about "unfettered capitalism" in a recent speach, of course she was using the age old socialist class envy argument. I'd like to know where the hell she was talking about, or who the hell she was trying to fool, because there has not been "unfettered capitalism" in this country for quite some time. Obviously she was championing even more government interference.
Do you support this kind of viewpoint or not? (Ya, ya, I know it was a loaded "lead-in")
Oviously (or it should be), any system is going to have its abuses, one can always find an example of malfeasance, but does that justify what she's proposing?
When I look at schools, government, economic policy, media, or the criminal justice system run by liberals, I see an abject failure, time and time again. I don't understand how people can continue to support such idoicy. Is it the explotation of base human emotion like greed and envy? Is it a numbed populice that doesn't want to be engaged? Have they succeded in convinicing people they are victims?
Whatever the reason, it doesn't look good for supporters of Democrats, this gloom and doom message in order to get elected.
It also doesn't look good for Republicans, if they can't beat such negativity.
What a friggin' mess!
But wait there's hope. Can you say Fred Thomson?
Jay,
You are an English teacher, not a lawyer. Now, how is an opinion a true finding of legal fact?
Another thing, Libby is not charged with leaking a covert person's identity. He was charged with lying to the prosecutor. It is Democrat hacks like yourself you claim Libby outed a Covert Plame. That is not what he was charged with. In fact, no one has been charged with it. If you can't understand that, take it to a competant legal council, not another political hack like yourself.
pcd,
It's not an opinion. It's a declassified summary of Valerie Plame's employment history based on her CIA records. This is not something Fitzgerald pulled out of thin air. What Plame did and how she did it is still so sensitive that the CIA won't even let her say in public that she worked for them before 2002! She's suing them because they won't okay her book, with the stated reason that she's not allowed to say when she started working there.
I know Libby wasn't charged with breaking the IIPA. I know no one was. Proving intent is hard to do, and Fitzgerald is pretty clear in his filings that Libby's obstruction--what he was convicted of--made it more difficult to prove that intent. In fact, his words were that Libby's lies "made impossible an accurate evaluation of the role that Mr. Libby and those with whom he worked played in the disclosure of information regarding Ms. Wilson's CIA employment and about the motivations for their actions."
And we do know that Libby told at least two reporters Plame's name and status as a CIA agent, even if the people he told chose not to publicize the information. Judy Miller went to jail because she didn't want to have to admit that Libby leaked the information to her, for example.
And I'm still not sure who these "Democrat hacks" are that you refer to.
Post a Comment