Took you long enough to dredge this one up. I've been waiting for a couple of days for you to post this.
From Mick LaSalle:
"I'm feeling really sorry for this man. No kidding.
His latest Fox commentary on Harry Reid is amazing in its lack of serious argument. It's pathetic, but what makes it more than that, what makes it downright alarming, is the clear passion with which Dennis Miller utters these banalities. He seems like a man who has been pushed, who has felt himself pushed, into an allegiance with the wrong camp, and now he's strenuously trying to go native -- to prove himself one of them, while retaining a bare shadow of his own original essence. Ain't working, pal . . . Or maybe he was always this thick? I don't believe it.
Anyway, if you want to see a walking talking casualty of the Bush administration, look no further. Don't be cruel to this man. He's a victim."
His make sense. Yours, specifically this one, is off the mark. Miller's not a victim of anything. He's reflecting the righteous attitude of being wholly pissed off that someone in Reid's position is, first off, in that position, and secondly, making a mockery of it with every drooling utterance that drips from his pie-hole. Miller's rant presupposes that Reid's pathetic excuse for a mind is obvious to all who are listening. Apparently, Miller didn't anticipate YOU listening, or the boob you quoted. Miller's rant is a demonstration of complete and utter frustration that we have to endure another moment of this guy on the world stage. THAT'S the point if his rant. If you wanted specifics from Miller, you wouldn't want to take the time to hear it all, so who are YOU crappin'?
10 comments:
Oh, that Harry would take Miller's advice.
Always enjoy Dennis Miller.
Took you long enough to dredge this one up. I've been waiting for a couple of days for you to post this.
From Mick LaSalle:
"I'm feeling really sorry for this man. No kidding.
His latest Fox commentary on Harry Reid is amazing in its lack of serious argument. It's pathetic, but what makes it more than that, what makes it downright alarming, is the clear passion with which Dennis Miller utters these banalities. He seems like a man who has been pushed, who has felt himself pushed, into an allegiance with the wrong camp, and now he's strenuously trying to go native -- to prove himself one of them, while retaining a bare shadow of his own original essence. Ain't working, pal . . . Or maybe he was always this thick? I don't believe it.
Anyway, if you want to see a walking talking casualty of the Bush administration, look no further. Don't be cruel to this man. He's a victim."
Pretty plain English, Game.
What? Only you are allowed to copy the writings of others?
I don't copy the writings of others in RESPONSE to something...
Big whoop! That's really lame. What makes your quotes more righteous than mine?
His make sense. Yours, specifically this one, is off the mark. Miller's not a victim of anything. He's reflecting the righteous attitude of being wholly pissed off that someone in Reid's position is, first off, in that position, and secondly, making a mockery of it with every drooling utterance that drips from his pie-hole. Miller's rant presupposes that Reid's pathetic excuse for a mind is obvious to all who are listening. Apparently, Miller didn't anticipate YOU listening, or the boob you quoted. Miller's rant is a demonstration of complete and utter frustration that we have to endure another moment of this guy on the world stage. THAT'S the point if his rant. If you wanted specifics from Miller, you wouldn't want to take the time to hear it all, so who are YOU crappin'?
I am SO HUMILIATED!
Are you from San Francisco, Jim?
Why do you ask, Jason?
Post a Comment