This story should get everyone mad, and explain why our government can't get anything done.
When border patrol agents shoot a known drug dealer, they should get a medal, and a bigger medal if the drug dealer is dead.
Instead, because of stupid PC rules, these guys are in jail.
You have a prosecutor who obviously hid things...and just in case you thought the drug dealer might change his ways, he was caught in a part of another drug bust that didn't go to trial because the govt's star witness couldn't be arrested.
Saturday, July 21, 2007
Bush asked to weigh in on border agents
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
14 comments:
I have not slept more than 6 hours in four days...didn't feel like reading hash's personal attacks after I typed a post where I typed something wrong...yes, I type these fast and don't catch them often...so I deleted his comment...and I might just continue to do that until hash either:
stops personal attacks
or simply leaves
either one would do fine with me
I understand your frustration, but are you also going to delete the posts of others on your blog who constantly post personal attacks? Others who have been here a lot longer than hash, Chet, Jay or Phil.
I will try...but Jim, it is getting rediculous around here.
And since Hash is throwing personal attacks at ME, that makes ME, the person who runs this blog mad...
Yes, I know someonetimes conservatives say things that don't need to be said, and you are probably right that I should not like those either, but understand that they are not at ME, so I just don't care as much...I hope doing this for a bit gets comments back to being a little moer civil without lowering readership
GAME--I will continue to enjoy the debate---STATE FAIR is around the corner,you can enjoy the recharging
of your energy level.I'll invite anyone who provides responses here to meet us at the refreshment area
in your archives and we'll buy them a beer.Don't get down,little people always react by doing little
things when they have no other recourse.
but understand that they are not at ME, so I just don't care as much...
That's pretty much conservatism in a nutshell, isn't it?
Another brain buster from Chet...
In a way yes chet...people should take care of themselves...unlike liberals who think the govt should take care of everyone...not the liberals, the govt.
Every study ever done shows conservatives give a bigger percentage of their income to charity, liberals expect the govt to do it.
Hey, I would like to sincerely apologize if I have offended anyone, or gone over the line. Just like in real life, I try to stay respectful until someone else throws the first punch, then it's on.
I assumed that everybody here is a big boy/girl, and can stand a few insults. It does get tedious to see people that contribute nothing to the debate but insults, however. I try to at least post on topic, backing up my beliefs with sources or logic. If you disagree, fine. If you want to call me a stupid moonbat, fine. But at least have the self respect and intelligence to call me a stupid moonbat and then show me why you think I'm wrong using evidence and/or logic that is more compelling than mine. Otherwise, you can call me stupid all you want, but the truth is, you are only highlighting your own stupidity.
PCD, Templar, are ya' listenin'?
I wouldn't say you have gone over the line...I do get tired of the name calling by everyone (I do it too sometimes)
So when you add lots of name calling, then too many personal attacks based on nothing, it gets to be too much for me
I was attacked first, and responded in kind, and that will be my policy, whatever the outcome.
I will serve as no conservative's doormat, so the way you holler into the mountain is very much the way you will hear the echo.
That said, I consider this episode finished.
ok - fine. Glad that the episode is finished. Coming back to the issue of Border agents - I wonder hy George Bush is not taking any action to release those guys? If he could do it for Libby, why not the border agents? Again, I don;t get it.
It makes no sense...but wait, I can't do this...my mind is controlled by GWB, Rush, Sean...they tell me what to say...I can't speak negatively about Bush!!!!
Which of these terms are acceptable for debate?
dickweed, buttweasel, shit-for-brains, wiener, caca-face, doodyhead....
Any? Just so I know.
Sometimes it's a fine line between snarky and asshole. I believe snarky is almost a requirement for good blog debates on most blogs. Assholeness can be left outside.
Its not that heated debate with a little name calling is bad...
Its constant name calling, whole posts simply full of emotional insuluts...and the WORST is personal attacks...if I don't see that for a week or so I can get rid of moderation...
Post a Comment