President George Bush is playing the hero again as he tours fire-ravaged California this week. Yet his expressions of concern are not likely to be taken well, since he has stood in the way of that state's effort to fight global warming emissions for the last two years!While Bush is attempting to score compassion points with the people of California, let's tell him not to burn Californians by blocking their duly enacted laws. The EPA must allow the state's Pavley, or "Clean Cars" fuel emission standards to go forward - along with the standards of a dozen other states that have followed California's lead.
Hey, I'm not making this up. We write something, liberals always come back with, "we don't think that, we didn't say that."
Well, since guys like Jim and others say that weekly, you might want to think about starting a new party...because your crazy-far left wing Democratic party does say stuff like, "GWB is burning down California." Crazy people believe that driving a different car would stop wild-fires in California...
Again libs, stop pretending and hiding who you are...all of you, come on out and say these crazy things in public too...
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Don't Let Bush Burn California
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
10 comments:
Andy, are you taking note? Of course he isn't, and neither is Jim.
Want to take up a pool to predict how soon Jim will cut and paste Think Progress on how this is all Bush's fault?
Actually, I was waiting for the...I don't know anyone who thinks this...
Ron was the master of that...
Do you mean to say that people understand what your point is? It's a lot like English but not so linear.
Very insightful, why did you waste everyone's time typing that?
If he disagrees, then comment, don't make stupid comments...that are emotional...
What was emotional? And what's the matter with emotional? Does that make it illegitimate?
"And what's the matter with emotional?"
Nothing. Emotions provide cues about personal honesty, the danger of a given situation, whether a person is suitable for a given office, et cetera. For instance, Obama is a much better person to have in the Senate than a bomb thrower like Alan Keyes, despite Obama's leftwing views. Or another example-- religious fundamentalists making threats against the United States while speaking in apocalyptic tones -- it is rational to be concerned about these people.
Emotion, however, isn't a substitute for logic. Fearing a conspiracy of Jews in our government like hash is completely irrational. Hillary worrying about Hussein's weapon capacity when the facilities required to make such weapons were destroyed in 1998-- that's giving into fear. While one can debate the merits of regime change in Iraq, the WMD case was absolute horseshit from a logical point of view.
"Fearing a conspiracy of Jews in our government like hash is completely irrational."
Oh? Really?
Have you evidence to the contrary?
"...because your crazy-far left wing Democratic party does say stuff like, "GWB is burning down California.""
Yeah, and the idiots in your party say that the environmentalists are burning down California.
Post a Comment