I'm sure people who love their country and military bash and slander innocent officers:
In the wake of the dismissal of charges against Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum, Gary at Let Freedom Ring makes the case for indicting John Murtha. An excerpt:
Let’s highlight that conflict between rep. Murtha and the Marine Corps spokesman because it highlights extremely important information.
If Gen. Hagee did indeed brief Rep. Murtha on May 24, 2006, that means that Rep. Murtha couldn’t make these accusations based on irrefutable facts; at least he couldn’t do that on May 17, 2006.
That brings us to our first ‘counts’ against Rep. Murtha: Violating the Haditha Marines’ constitutional protection of (a) being presumed innocent until provent guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and (b) violating their due process rights.
Another accusation Rep. Murtha made was that the officers in charge of the 3/1 Marines covered up their findings of what happened on November 19, 2005 in the city of Haditha. That’s absurd because we know that Captain Jeffrey Dinsmore put together a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation, which was sent up the chain of command. That isn’t speculation; that’s his sworn testimony. The fact that the people further up the chain of command said that there isn’t anything to investigate says it all.
Rep. Murtha told ABCNews’ Charlie Gibson that he knew there was a cover-up “someplace.” As I’ve said before, if you think something is true but can’t prove it, then you should say that “I believe that there is a coverup someplace.” You don’t say that you know there’s a coverup.
That’s the second count in the indictment. Rep. Murtha made false accusations against the Haditha Marines. What’s worse is that he made those accusations without verifiable proof of wrongdoing. Knowingly filing false charges against someone is a crime.
The third count in the indictment is possibly the weightiest of charges. Murtha’s connections within the Pentagon are deep. He’s built a mini-empire by acting as a ‘recruiter’ for companies in the military industrial complex. When they want a new hardware, Rep. Murtha gets it for them. As a result, they paid particularly close attention when Rep. Murtha made an accusation against the Haditha Marines.
With his clout, Rep. Murtha did everything except play the role of judge, jury and executioner. In civilian court, he would’ve been accused of poisoning the jury pool, which is another violation of the Haditha Marines’ due process rights.
HT: MM
Sunday, March 30, 2008
An indictment against John Murtha
Posted by The Game at 9:44 AM
Labels: liberals on the military, murtha
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
another way off base post, game. go read the definition of the word "accusation". An accusation does not require "irrefutable proof" but a reasonable set of circumstances, eye-witness reports, and some evidence. otherwise, no trials would ever be necessary.
murtha didn't make this stuff up in a vacuum. he was given this information by knowledgeable sources within the military and the pentagon where he has long-standing contacts and relationships. the judgment that these incidents did not meet the threshold of prosecutable crimes is beside the point. the incidents occurred and us marines were involved. as a former marine, i'm sure murtha was concerned about the reputation of the corps based on conduct reported to him by people who were there, involved, or somehow found out about it through the chain of command.
you've got nothing here on murtha except another smear campaign, game.
I agree that Murtha should've kept his mouth shut until the court proceedings were finished.
Innocent until proven guilty, even (especially) for the military.
so you are saying that all court proceedings should be kept secret? no charges are made public until the accused is acquitted or put in jail?
what country are you living in?
After reading your blog i generally want to punch myself in the crotch nine or ten times but yr right on about this. The story isn't even about the massacre its about a politician distorting facts in order to reach a political objective. Sounds kind of familiar though...
why do I think that is so funny
Post a Comment