On the same day we get this story:
Iran Tests Advanced Centrifuge
Obama does not get it.
He doesn't understand evil unless it is the evil racist America he heard about for 20 years every Sunday. Maybe all these morons who surround Obama at all times have really messed him up.
He has a warped view of the world.
UPDATE:
Hillary tries to look even more stupid and less competent about the world today. It was hard to top her rival after he wanted to have a sit down with a country trying to blow up the Western world, but she did her best.
Clinton demands withdrawal from Iraq
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
Obama calls for talks with Iran over Iraq
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
9 comments:
What country is trying to blow up the Western world? Nice to see hyperbole is not dead.
And yet you will vote for McCain, who STILL doesn't even know the difference between Sunni and Shiite.
Just today, Iraq Ambassador Ryan Crocker admitted to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that The danger of Al Qaeda in Iraq is miniscule compared to their established base of operations in the mountains between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
but the senile John McCain and his band of merry warmongers are insanely devoted to their plot to "Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran", a country whose stature and strategic position we have strengthened by our lack of a coherent plan in Iraq, going so far as to prop up a government who is more under Iran's influence than ours.
Honestly, your rhetoric is getting little boring with the same talking points. I'm not sure if you have ever lived outside USA or even made any attempt to understand how rest of the world functions...Your assertion that "Iran is trying to blow up the western world" is simply rediculous. By the way, I am just wondering if you know the concept of 'karma'?? Do you know .....since how long we have been 'playing politics' all over the world? You think all those 'foreign policies' will have NO effect?
Oh man...there is nothing wrong with talking to a country. We talk to Saudi Arabia, we talk to Pakistan, We talk to Palestanians....Why not Iran? It doesn't mean that we are surrendering to them!!
I would rather see chaos in Iraq and lose 10,000 people after airstrikes in Iran than lose Tel Aviv, New York, Boston, Seattle, and and London after Iran gives the Party of God the bomb.
McCain is correct -- a nuclear armed Iran is *not* an option. While airstrikes should not be our first option, the Democrats that think rightwing fundamentalists can be trusted with nuclear weapons have taken their self-hatred of the West to suicidal levels.
Obama says:
"I think that increased pressure in a measured way, in my mind, and this is where we disagree, includes a timetable for withdrawal. Nobody is asking for a precipitous withdrawal."
Hmmm, increased pressure including a timetable for withdrawal.
Iran covets Iraq. Iran happens to be one of our (if not the) biggest concerns, when we eventually leave Iraq. Iran is a flock of vultures licking their beaks, waiting for us to leave.
Sooo. The Obamameister thinks we should publicly pressure Iraq and publish a timetable. Ingenious! I can’t think of a better way to further the turmoil in the Middle-East. And then of course, this would give libs another reason (excuse) to trash America and her policies.
Damn! If the Democrats couldn’t rely on clueless voters, we’d have a one party system in this country of ours..
"that think rightwing fundamentalists can be trusted with nuclear weapons"
you mean the current administration? or pakistan?
Obama would change everything: http://observers.france24.com/en/content/20080409-obama-iran-talk-ahmadinejad-banisadr
it is revealing that tel aviv is the city mr. bowden is concerned about, first and foremost
Post a Comment