Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Will there be enough vote fraud for an Obama win?

the Milwaukee Police dept did an indepth investigation to all the vote fraud in 2004. here
No one criticized it, it has been accepted as fact.
The author of that report predicts that there will be around 55,000 illegal votes for Obama in WI alone.
Watch each state...states where Obama only wins by 1-2 or even 3 percent can be given up as vote fraud wins...
It makes me so mad already to see McCain only up by 2000 votes in some states...
Well, you had to cheat to get Kennedy elected...its what you do.

Why are all the early stores about Dems only:
Election observer threatened with arrest after offering ride to voter
Obama backer offers subs, snacks to north side poll workers
Election observer booted from polling place

19 comments:

blamin said...

Don't forget the Media factor. The MSM projected at least a 5% influence on voters. I believe any objective observer would admit they've done their damndest to deliver.

But in the end, I'm not sure it mattered. What has mattered is the purposeful manipulation of the foundation of education. The purposeful lack of training in critical thinking skills, and US history perpetrated by the Marxist in control of the public education system.

There are a few bright points in today’s obomination.

It appears he won’t get a filibuster proof majority in the senate. And most importantly, if he governs based on his record instead of his campaign promises, we’re going to see a Reganistic swing in power at the end of his term.

Also, almost without fail, those Republican congressmen that tended to move left have failed in their re-election bids. Why vote for someone who pretends to be a Democrat when you can vote for the real thing?

There’s also a strong possibility that we’re going to see a return to its roots by the Repub party, if not an out-and-out creation of a new conservative party.

Lastly, it appears the economy played a large part in today’s election, particularly the latest Fannie/Freddie fiasco. It’s amazing that the party most responsible for the failure has been able to shift the blame. Oh well, public education and the media strikes again!

Anonymous said...

boo frickin' hoo. we knew you would immediately begin to attempt to delegitimize obama's presidency.

well, you go out and prove mass fraud if you can. the dems proved massive fraud and voter suppression in 2004 and it didn't do any good.

this time, the win appears to be wide-spread and well beyond any claims of voter fraud.

enjoy crying in your beer.

Anonymous said...

For a member of the party of "personal responsibility" it's borderline tragic the amount of blaming that you do.

Never once could you stop and even consider the possibility that conservatism has it wrong. The American people have seen your vision of what Republicans want to do to this country and they're soundly rejecting it.

Time to start living in reality and stop living in your fantasyland, boogeyman-filled Jack Bauer circle-jerk.

BOO! "They" are out to get you! Try some medication. It might help.

Anonymous said...

I'd leave my name, but your attacking style and finger pointing just shows your narrow minded view of the world. Your view and the view of the people like you are exactly what this country doesn't need. As an educator, you should be embarrassed with your views on things. As a teacher, your job is to educate and facilitate open-mindedness in issues and concerns...not create hysterics and ignorance. Just because your daddy voted Republican for 30 years doesn't mean you have to. Open your mind and THINK FOR YOURSELF. And if you don't like the new direction for America, move to Mexico where no one gives a shit what you do with yourself.

blamin said...

anon (coward),

The dems didn't "prove" jack-S---.

Game is in the midst of the "battle-ground" states. He's seen first hand the thug tactics.

Like I alluded to...this is an awakening for conservatives. We will retake the Socialist Republic of America. When the pendulum swings it has to return.

jhbowden said...

"And if you don't like the new direction for America, move to Mexico where no one gives a shit what you do with yourself."

Hear, hear! Can I come back as an "undocumented worker" and get free stuff?

blamin said...

Never once could you stop and even consider the possibility that conservatism has it wrong.

Methinks you know not what you speak of. Not unusual. Exactly what conservative principals “have it wrong?”.

jhbowden said...

"I know, that's not nearly sexy or "explody" enough for you."

You would be correct. Religious fanatics, almost always a minority anywhere in the world, often want to accomplish through force what they cannot through voting. As a result, they must be actively resisted with force. This sucks, but those are the cards we are given.

I sincerely wish you are right, and we could confront fanaticism easily with just words.

Anonymous said...

Blamin, the notions that the free market will cure all the world's ills even when complete transparency of all market systems will never be possible, that the United States should be the world's police force with no regard to standing treaties and alliances, that trickle-down economics actually works, and so on.

The Republican party has *used* conservatism and has left the movement in tatters. All that's left is a shell of a once proud party that now represents the most hateful, greedy, and corrupt dregs of our society.

There's plenty of good things to be said for *true* conservatism and it's a shame that true champions of that ideology now are marginalized and scorned.

blamin said...

Anon suggest that Obama wants to “prevent people from becoming terrorist, in the first place”.

Bwaaahaaahaaahahaha…haha.

You truly project god-like powers onto your idol.

There is nothing, I repeat nothing, we can do to achieve such lofty goals. But, it’s very telling of the mindset of the self-deluded.

Oh my, the disillusion in store for these fools will be something that’s studied for decades.

jhbowden said...

anon--

No one believes that markets can cure all of the world's ills. Conservatives do believe markets outperform centralized bureaucracies-- compare India before and after 1990, Eastern Europe before and after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Hong Kong versus the PRC under Mao, Japan before and after the Meiji restoration, and so forth.

Here in the USA, the era of 1980-2008 is the most prosperous on record -- that's because people like Clinton passed free trade (NAFTA), cut taxes (e.g. capital gains), deregulated many sectors of our economy (e.g. telecom) and it has resulted in a higher standard of living for the common man.

Japan in the 1990s stagnated because after their real-estate bubble popped around 1990, they decided some businesses were too big to fail and subsidized them. That's a formula for stagnation; I fear we're heading down the same road thanks to Bush and his Democrat friends.

blamin said...

Anon,

Since when did “the United States should be the world's police force become a “conservative principal”? I must have missed that newsletter. No, that’s a Rino principal, or if it’s politically correct a liberal principal.

History suggests we should “insert” ourselves in world problems only when there is a national security/interest issue.

Anonymous said...

Jason, I'd suggest that the economic boom from 1980-2008, but especially in the 1990's, had more to do with the widespread acceptance and use of consumer and corporate credit. Credit artificially accelerates any economy...personal or federal. Right now, we're reaping what we sowed.

Personally, I think the bailout package was a terrible mistake and it only delays the inevitable. Let's take our lumps and move through it. I think pouring another drink to the alcoholic does no good for anyone.

Also, any nonsense talk of another "economic stimulus" is more good money down the tubes. The money won't get spent. Rather it will just wind up with the banks as people use the latest stimulus check to pay a bill. Lord knows that I'd do that or plow it into my brokerage account.

Anonymous said...

Blamin, I'm in agreement with you. Therein lies the problem. The Republican party has co-opted the conservative ideology for its own selfish purposes and the end result is that no matter how untrue, the general public no longer can see the differences. Hence, the American public has rejected conservatism.

I'm completely opposed to isolationism, but we have no business trotting around the globe like we've been doing for the last 30 years.

Don't miss the point about preventing terrorism in the first place. Our enemies have stated openly the reasons for their hatred of us, and it has nothing to do with our women being able to drive or Paris Hilton. The biggest sources of hate stem from our support for regimes that they rightly, or wrongly, view as oppressive. The Saudi government is brutal towards its people, yet one of the only reasons that monarchy hasn't been toppled is because of our support. The Israel/Palestinian conflict also fans the flames of extremism.

Look, I know you think I'm a bleeding heart about this, but I don't care. Put the shoe on the other foot. When you literally have generations of people fighting, children are raised to hate and fight and these people have nothing to look forward to other than dying in the name of their singular cause... be honest, how do you defeat that?

How do you intimidate someone who is willing and ready to die?

The answer is not intimidation and endless violence. Protection of our country and our lives is above all the most important, but at some point isn't it prudent to address the root causes?

Thanks for the conversation, guys.

Anonymous said...

"As an educator, you should be embarrassed with your views on things. As a teacher, your job is to educate and facilitate open-mindedness in issues and concerns...not create hysterics and ignorance."

and, anonymous's exact motivation here is to remind game that he is a public high school teacher, for a politically correct inner-city board, and game must stop expressing his opinions on his own blog, lest he find such opinions exposed and disseminated, his reputation sullied with "racism", his livelihood and well-being of his family in jeopardy

trust me on this, i am of the left, i know the suppressive tactics when i see them

Realism said...

How do you intimidate someone who is willing and ready to die?

You show them that their death will be in vain. You create conditions where each of their deaths makes their goal LESS likely to occur. Bush has done the opposite.

Anonymous said...

yes, by all means, why not halal barbecue, lush contemporary rhythms, and an evening of interpretative dance, while you are at it?

realism, you are an utter fool, living in an idealized dream world

that's fine and good, but perhaps we should get reparations for your interruptions to an already-difficult-to-maintain discussion, that your "realism" never seems to touch

Realism said...

Your lack of specific arguments and vengeful personal attacks vividly illustrate your vapid, hateful world view.

Thank you for discrediting yourself and saving me the trouble.

Ron said...

realism-hash claims to be from the left but I think it is only when a good shipment of blonde lebanese is in town to calm him down a little.

I'm fine with them spewing their hate and frothing at the mouth all they want now. It's what lost them the election and if they don't see that they are bound to loose a few more, which is fine with me. Spiritual beings in fact they are but certainly not in thought.

Carry on cavemen.