Kentucky Senate
Illinois Senate: Kirk 46%, Giannoulias 40%
Election 2010: Arkansas Senate
Election 2010: Florida Senate
Election 2010: Iowa Senate
Election 2010: Wisconsin Senate
Election 2010: Indiana Senate
Election 2010: Pennsylvania Senate
Election 2010: Missouri Senate
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Polls not looking good for Dems
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
28 comments:
When was Grassley ever considered a target in '10?
Hasn't Feingold always had contested races? His stance on campaign finance handcuffs him financially.
Feingold's incompetence in office is what handcuffs him totally..as I
said before...a real chance to get rid of this mediocre career politician...
Wonderful analysis as always.
He co-sponsored landmark campaign finance reform that, to put it mildly, irks the Washington establishment. You may not like his politics, but guiding such a major piece of legislation through the Senate shows quite a bit of competence.
This point has long been lost on you- a difference in political philosophy does not define an individual as incompetent.
Still...a mediocre career politician..that has nothing to do with anyone's politics...I'm glad your impressed with his landmark legislation..it is still time for a
change..
How about a competent politician like Mark Neumann or Scott (I still don't have my college degree) Walker. Change you can believe in...
Tom Barrett...The DULLARD Doyle...
"O" the entertainer..thanks for the reminder that a college degree
certainly doesn't work for everybody...
You have provided no substance as to why he's mediocre, only that you disagree with his political philosophy.
And Bush had an MBA. Maybe a HS dropout or a short bus rider is what the country needs. Good point, Scorp.
A fourth six year term with Wisconsin going downhill totally during the first three mediocre terms..total substance in that...time for someone else..
And what policies has Feingold advanced that have directly contributed to what you see as a downfall? What exactly has made his terms mediocre?
Substance requires specifics, not the rough outline of tired talking points.
Wanting a fourth term is substance enough to say enough is enough...I
was not allowed to get the energy credit last year for my replacement windows brcause a certain mediocre politician stopped
the energy credit for one year..a direct bit of substance...
He took away your govt handout? Oh the irony of it all....
Thought we wanted substance....its time for a change..no irony in that..
So we should get rid of every politician who has served three or more terms? Is that really your position?
Can you name the bill in which the energy credit was blocked and a record of Feingold's action? You are shockingly full of hot air and low on substance.
I'm so sorry you are stuck on this mediocre career politician..my substance is fine to anyone alive from the neck up...but..when your unrealistic..you're in love with "O" the entertainer...and your
sorry supporters of his agenda..like on his way out...the inept one...the mediocre Senator from Wisconsin...and I don't mean the one stuck with an NBA franchise..
I'm actually looking for a coherent argument or any hint of an intellect. I realize that's quite a lot to ask of you.
Just keep bringing on the comic relief...that's all your intelligence level provides us with anyway...maybe you and the senator can take your show on the road...hopefully he'll be looking for a new job he might be good at..
I rest my case. You can't name a specific bill nor can you name specific votes. All you have to offer is "he's not conservative."
Sorry pal, intelligent dialogue requires more than that.
Sorry...don't need to name a bill..stance on health care is ridiculous enough..hopefully you can follow his career when he secures a new position...please continue to provide your point of view..especially enjoyable on the week end..
Without the use of talking points, how is his stance objectionable? What votes has he cast that damage the state of health care and how?
Yes, actual votes and bills matter when discussing government. I'm glad you find your own intellectual shortcomings so entertaining.
Does your obviously limited intellect get the basis for the word stance..either way thanks for the comedy on Monday morning..someone so full of..themselves..is always laughable
anytime they "think" their being insulting..when actually you're giving me a nice laugh..certainly keep the insults coming...I miss
the other great comics who no longer post their good humor here.
I am so insulted by someone unable to grasp basic grammar.....
I understand the meaning of the word stance. I also understand your difficulty in defining, in policy terms, what is so objectionable unless the game has done it for you.
Again, I'm pleased you can laugh at your own stupidity.
Andy said:
And what policies has Feingold advanced that have directly contributed to what you see as a downfall? What exactly has made his terms mediocre?
List:
Voted against the patriot act, which has kept us safe and since more and more Americans are seeing how pathetic liberals deal with terrorists and the rest of the world, if you asked them if the patriot act was good 70% would say yes, and 20 of the remaining 30 would only say no because they still believe the network news
He voted for the health care bill that almost NO ONE likes, and that vote alone is enough to kick him out.
His only legislative success is the campaign finance reform bill which has been a failure.
voted for the stimulus bill that more and more American's see as a complete failure..
See, just the fact he votes for the things Obama wants is enough..these are some specifics..he is a hard, hard, hard core liberal..and we are seeing what a complete and total failure that thought process is..
Actually, people who can remember longer than a month already knew that..but even the "independents" and "undecides" are even figuring it out
I'm sorry GAME...I always give the good humor boys the benefit of the doubt in knowing what's going on...
I hope your "substance" doesn't end
the comedy I enjoy from yet another
disciple of my favorite...old hash...at least maybe now I won't have to feel so "insulted"...in fact..I'll again make my standing offer that not one great debater has taken up over the years..let's meet face to face for a real discussion..as I said in the past...I'll buy..a chance at real debate..or..will the sad old commentary just keep on providing the daily comedy...
Shocking! Scorpion simply slurped what Game posted....
Scorpion, I have much better things to do when I visit Wisconsin.
I kind of expected from your comical responses that you wouldn't
accept a free drink...slurped is what you call it..not shocking in the least... to those who follow along with what I said I will do at this RIGHT ON site and have done over the years I have been consistent in letting the RIGHT ON bloggers do all the "substance" while I respond to the insults and comedy..if you can't accept the challenge of a real face to face...
simply keep it clean and I will enjoy your limited viewpoint without even responding..how's that....
hope you enjoy Wisconsin on your next visit..let me know if you change your "mind".....
Give me a break. You're unable to provide any substance, any adult conversation. I asked a series of substantive question which you were unable to answer.
I'm not willing to spend my vacations in WI with someone so immature that they label all questions they can't answer as comedy. Grow up and you may have a few takers.
I have given you every break I can...you are the ONLY blogger ever who has not figured out what I
have stated earlier..once again..
keep it clean and I will simply enjoy the substance..good luck to you..keep those substantive questions coming...by the way...if I'm so immature...I would guess you'll let me have the last word now...as there is supposedly no substance you need not reply..correct...
Post a Comment