Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Black USDA official resigns after saying she only 'did enough' for white farmer

This is happening all over the radical's administration. Why isn't Holder going after the new black panthers? Why are they suing a state on behalf of non-citizens? Why are they appealing court cases where it was shown blacks were discriminating whites?

31 comments:

Jim said...

FALSE! This video was edited to exclude the part where this person was describing at length something that happened 24 YEARS AGO and how she had changed as her relationship with the individual grew and flourished.

From TPM:

Sherrod identified the white farmer as Roger Spooner. CNN today interviewed his wife, Eloise Spooner, who said Sherrod had helped her and her husband save their farm.

"She's a good friend ... she helped save her farm," Spooner said, adding that Sherrod did all she could to help them. "They have not treated her right."

TerryN said...

It is revealing to hear her speak so candidly about "his own kind" "took him to a white lawyer". I'm sure she's a liberal because she sees race first.

Brietbart just used the same editing tactics "journalists" use.

Jim said...

How utterly lame you are Terry. And obviously enormously ignorant to boot.

"I'm sure revealing Brietbart use race tactics."

These are YOUR exact words, Terry!

TerryN said...

No they're not. What you wrote makes no sense. They're your words.

I do have a new found respect for Shirley Sherrod now that the rest of the story has come out but like I said, she's a liberal.

Jim said...

she's a liberal Good for her. How do you know that, though?

They are your exact words. You said every one of them right here on this page.

American said...

I can't blame Terry here. Unfortunately, this is the case of millions who are getting their 'news' propaganda networks such as Fox news and MSNBC.

This also highlights the sad state of our 'jounalism' which has been ruined by 'Fox News' standards in the past 10 years.

HumbleHumanity said...

How about now, american? Is Obama admin getting their news from fox or msnbc?

TerryN said...

Did Dan Rather work for Fox?

American said...

@HH - Hmmm....Why are you asking me about Obama admin? smiles...I was only pointing out how channels such as Fox/MSNBC are poisoning the 'news'.

@Terry - No. Do you agree that there are millions of clueless people like you who tune into channels like MSNBC and Fox to get your daily dosage of 'news'? (Don't bother answering - it's only a rhetorical question, we all know the answer) ;-)

HumbleHumanity said...

So American,

Where should I be going to get your obviously better version of the news?

TerryN said...

American, Do you get a feeling of superiority by calling me clueless rhetorically?

FOX News is the most fair and balanced news organization out there. They said so themselves.

American said...

@HH,

Thanks for checking with me.

If you want 'news', don't go to MSNBC, Fox News channel or talk radio!!

By the way, why were you asking me about Obama admin? smiles....

American said...

@ Terry:
"FOX News is the most fair and balanced news organization out there."

See,that's why I said don't bother answering my question because I knew it!! ;)

Do you also listen to Glennn Beck/ Rush Limbaugh to get your 'news'? (Again, you don't really have to answer it!)

HumbleHumanity said...

I didn't ask where NOT to go, i asked where to go.

American said...

I told you where NOT to go. That's the first step.

You still din't answermy question - Why did you ask me about Obama Admin?

TerryN said...

American, You must not have read my second sentence in my previous comment.

It's really hare to convey sarcasm when you can't inflect words on a keyboard.

A limitation to one of the most universal languages. Wonder how that works in Mandarin?

TerryN said...

Correction: hare = hard. Even with a spellchecker one still must proofread.

HumbleHumanity said...

Why did I ask? they are ones telling us NOT to listen to fox. they made the call to fire sherrod, so their source must not be much better. I was just wondering if you know where they get their news.

American said...

@ HH :
How would I know where Obama admin people get their 'news'? May be, you should asking them?

HumbleHumanity said...

So we have established my first step and where NOT to go, what is my second step?

Im not sure how NOT doing something can be a step. Kinda like the feds NOT enforcing our imigration laws.

American said...

"Im not sure how NOT doing something can be a step" - HH

You don't know? No problem - I understand your struggle. Here is how it helps. If you don't know what NOT to do - then you end up listening to Glenn Beck/Rush Limbaugh/Sean Hannity and start believing their opinions/talking points on every subject as if it is gospel/news.

Immigration issue and Feds? Well, people like Ronald Reagan gave amnesty to millions of people who broke the law and came here. Feds are not enforcing it either.

However, I didn't understand why you brought up Feds and immigration laws in relation to our discussion on 'news' coverage. Could you please explain?

By the way, why were you again asking me about Obama admin? You should be asking them, right?

HumbleHumanity said...

I am asking you about Obama admin because they aren't listening to me. They never return my calls or emails.

Is that how your better half makes a saturday list for you?

1. Don't go to Hooters.
2. Don't go to the bars.
3. Don't get your news from anyone with an opinion or possible bias because that would mean you are a minion of the evil left or right wing.

Why are you telling me what Reagan did?

American said...

"I am asking you about Obama admin because they aren't listening to me" - HH

This is like calling Wells Fargo help line to reset your password if US bank help line is too busy!! smiles...

As to the Reagan thing - Please note that I 'told' you what he did. I wasn't asking you what he did.

So, why were you asking me about Obama admin? You can get the answer only from Obama admin, not from some random guy online. (Another lesson in getting the 'news').

Also, why did you bring up the Feds thing when we were talking about 'News'?

HumbleHumanity said...

So lets wrap this up then. What have we accomplished. this

you have acknowledged that you are a

"GUY"

thanks

American said...

"So lets wrap this up then.." says HH.

Impatience doesn't help in getting real 'news', my friend (one more lesson)! smiles...

HumbleHumanity said...

Yeah? when you decide to share your incredible wealth of unbiased and transparent news, then we can resume.
I was asking an honest question. I try to get news from as many sources as possible. I read AOL, Drudge, Rush, Fox, CNN, Cspan and MSNBC. But then I have an internal filter, I can differentiate between news and commentary. It is no insult to me to bash fox, rush, or olbermann.

American said...

"when you decide to share your incredible wealth of..." - HH

I guess I have already pointed out a few pointers in our 'conversation'. Why are you brining up 'commentary' here? We are talking about 'News'.

HumbleHumanity said...

Oh, so you are saying there is a difference?

American said...

Are you saying that there is no difference?

HumbleHumanity said...

Well, ive been asking you questions, and you haven't answered a single one, so i am the only one saying anything.

Its cool, i didn't really want to talk, chat, discuss, anyway.

American said...

well - remember, you started asking questions first. Why are you ignoring it? (another lesson in 'News' - don't ignore the facts!!) smiles...