Just go over these two stories about all the tolerance, peace and civility carried out in Muslim communities....almost as much tolerance as Liberals have for conservative blacks.
Security patrols to prevent beheading revenge attacks
HUNDREDS of security forces patrolled tense streets in the Indonesian province of central Sulawesi yesterday to prevent revenge attacks after assailants wearing black veils beheaded three Christian schoolgirls and seriously wounded a fourth.
National police spokesman Major-General Aryanto Budihardjo said the murders were carried out by "terrorists" seeking to destabilise the area, which has long been plagued by violence between Muslims and Christians. He said it was no coincidence the attack occurred just days before the biggest holiday on the Islamic calendar.
Rioting Spreads to 20 Towns Around Paris
Rampaging youths shot at police and firefighters Thursday after burning car dealerships and public buses and hurling rocks at commuter trains, as eight days of riots over poor conditions in Paris-area housing projects spread to 20 towns.
Youths ignored an appeal for calm from President Jacques Chirac, whose government worked feverishly to fend off a political crisis amid criticism that it has ignored problems in neighborhoods heavily populated by first- and second-generation North African and Muslim immigrants.
The second story has an even greater message....look what happens when you have no border policy and you let anyone and everyone in your country...now it is too late for them...over 10% of the population of France is Muslim...they made their bed, now they have to sleep in it....luckily we are not quite as liberal as Europe yet...maybe we can learn from their mistakes.
Posts
13 comments:
The French have been extremely successful at brutal suppression for hundreds of years. They just got sick of it. The English had a lot more flair for torture and repression than the French ever did. Once the French Imperial attitude fell apart, so did the backbone for such methods. Open any history book and turn to Algeria, or Vietnam.
Whatever theories or philosophy they are using now seems to be working very well, doesn't it rhyno???
Typical Republican. I gave an observation, not an opinion.
In the 12th century AD, Islamic culture came to an abrupt halt. They saw themselves as having reached the height of cultural and technical evolution. Which wasn't far from the truth in that day.
Fast forward 500 years and they wake up in a world which has surpassed them in all respects.
Sadly, instead of trying to catch up, they are trying to turn back the clock to Medieval times.
Humanzee is 100% correct on his reading of the future......The Frenchies will eventually wake up.
And when they do, there will be Hell to pay.
The European Mexicans (Muslims) have settled in much of Europe, and their population base will cause huge difficulties........But they will be put down.
This is what the Euro-sissies get for refusing to get fully vested in the GWOT.......Now they will have to fight the battles on their own soil. --> Just like they did by appeasing Hitler. You'd think they'd learn over time. Naaaaaah!
----------
Unfortunately, the U.S. has a similar problem with the Mexicans.....Though they aren't an ideological problem in any way.
They are an economic problem which is equally troubling as ideological problems.......Let alone the cultural problems they are creating.
Hey Rhyno, you should know about the lies of American textbooks.....Considering it is Liberal scum who have been producing them for the past 40+ years.
Nice blog. I haven't been to it before.
You said....look what happens when you have no border policy and you let anyone and everyone in your country...now it is too late for them..."
Exactly right, but we don't seem to be learning a lot. We still haven't done enought to secure our borders. And please don't misunderstand me, I am pro Bush, but I don't agree with him on the border issue and don't understand why we haven't done more to protect ourselves.
The border is a problem that neither Bush or any other politician will address...if they only knew that the first person to take a hard stance against border jumpers will win a great deal of support...from legal, voting hispanics as well.
Show me one textbook full of lies, outside of those produced for the ignorant bible-thumper states.
I've taken whole classes on this man...
and it usually isn't outright lies, it s omitting the facts...not mentioning things, leaving things out....that is what they do..well documented, even reported in the MSM.
I know Game. That is the way the news media and the public educational system promotes the liberal myths.
As I said before, in a post a couple of months ago, the real facts, and the resources to the original government documents about these facts, are accessible only to those in graduate programs. To try and explain, to the duped liberal masses, in layman's terms, what several years of graduate school has enlightened us to requires too much time...and patience. I don't have anywhere near as much patience as you do. Plus I'm a bit older, so I don't bother trying to repeatedly explain
to the uninformed like you do anymore. When you get older, your time on earth is limited. I have a family. I pass the torch on to them. Hopefully all Republicans will do the same. I take care of my part of the world.....if everyone would do that........
Poison P...just think about the extra costs caused by the insistence that we provide Mexicans with interpreters, and with bilingual teachers in our public school systems, etc., ad nauseum. Those costs are outrageous. And did you know that the federal government requires all health care facilities receiving any sort of government funds, to provide interpretation for any language that might be spoken in their community population?! Sad, but true. San Francisco has a very complicated system of translators available to their health care systems.
And to think, that my great grandparents, and grandparents were actually forced to learn English...quickly, or be kept out of public schools, and the public work force! Surely there is some sort of government program that reimburses these early immigrants for all the suffering they went through at the hands of the American government which was so unsympathetic to their native culture?! Sarcasm...pointing that out for the simple minded libs.
Rhyno, an observation is much more factual based/objective than an
opinion. An observation states what facts have been observed, and allows the reader to form his/her own opinion based on facts. An opinion often ignores the facts, and imposes one's own beliefs onto the reader. An observation allows the reader to form his/her own views, based on the observed data. An opinion is generally more narrow minded, as the true facts aren't always recognized by the opinionated person. See definition #2 under opinion.
So really you paid Game and Republicans a compliment. Heh, Heh, Heh :)
Main Entry: ob·ser·va·tion
Pronunciation: "äb-s&r-'vA-sh&n, -z&r-
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French, from Latin observation-, observatio, from observare
1 : an act or instance of observing a custom, rule, or law : OBSERVANCE
2 a : an act of recognizing and noting a fact or occurrence often involving measurement with instruments weather observations b : a record or description so obtained
3 : a judgment on or inference from what one has observed; broadly : REMARK, STATEMENT
Main Entry: opin·ion
Pronunciation: &-'pin-y&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin opinion-, opinio, from opinari
1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter b : APPROVAL, ESTEEM
2 a : belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge b : a generally held view
3 a : a formal expression of judgment or advice by an expert b : the formal expression (as by a judge, court, or referee) of the legal reasons and principles upon which a legal decision is based
- opin·ioned /-y&nd/ adjective
synonyms OPINION, VIEW, BELIEF, CONVICTION, PERSUASION, SENTIMENT mean a judgment one holds as true. OPINION implies a conclusion thought out yet open to dispute each expert seemed to have a different opinion. VIEW suggests a subjective opinion very assertive in stating his views. BELIEF implies often deliberate acceptance and intellectual assent a firm belief in her party's platform. CONVICTION applies to a firmly and seriously held belief the conviction that animal life is as sacred as human. PERSUASION suggests a belief grounded on assurance (as by evidence) of its truth was of the persuasion that everything changes. SENTIMENT suggests a settled opinion reflective of one's feelings her feminist sentiments are well-known
Post a Comment