Here is a post from the wonderful ANN mocking all the stupid charges trying to bring down the Right that never get anywhere...enjoy:
I'm getting a little insulted that no Democratic prosecutor has indicted me. Liberals bring trumped-up criminal charges against all the most dangerous conservatives. Why not me?
Democrat prosecutor Barry Krischer has spent two years and hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to find some criminal charge to bring against Rush Limbaugh. Political hack Ronnie Earle spent three years and went through six grand juries to indict Tom DeLay. Liberals spent the last two years fantasizing in public about Karl Rove being indicted. Newt Gingrich was under criminal investigation for 3 1/2 years back in the '90s when liberals were afraid of him. Final result: No crime.
And of course, everybody cool in the Reagan administration was indicted. Or at least investigated and persecuted. Reagan's sainted attorney general Ed Meese was criminally investigated for 14 months before the prosecutor announced that he didn't have anything (but denounced Meese as a crook anyway).
I note that nobody ever wanted to indict Bob Dole or Gerald Ford (except, of course, other Republicans).
In the Nixon administration, liberals even brought "Deep Throat" up on charges — and he was one of you people! What, now I'm not even as hip as "Deep Throat"?
I've done a lot for my country. I think I deserve to be indicted, too. How am I supposed to show my face around Washington if I haven't been "frog-marched" out of my office by some liberal D.A. looking to move to D.C. for the next Democratic administration? What's a girl have to do to become a "person of interest" around here? Mr. Krischer, where do I go to get rid of my reputation?
Barry Krischer has been going around calling El Rushbo a criminal for more than two years but has yet to bring any charges. Last month, Krischer's assistant, James Martz, told the court that his office has "no idea" if Limbaugh has even committed a crime. I'm no lawyer — hey, wait a minute, yes I am! — but it sounds like maybe Krischer's maid has been out scoring him stupid pills again.
These liberals are fanatics about privacy when it comes to man-boy sex and stabbing forks into partially-born children. But a maid alleges that she bought Rush Limbaugh a few Percodans, and suddenly the government has declared a war on prescription painkillers.
Liberals are more optimistic about the charges against Tom DeLay than they are about the charges against Saddam Hussein — and the only living things Tom DeLay ever exterminated were rats and bugs.
In the remaining money-laundering case against DeLay, the prosecutors have acknowledged that they cannot produce the actual list of candidates who allegedly gained from the purported money-laundering scheme. But they hope to introduce a facsimile cobbled together from someone's memory.
In other words, during Rathergate, the case against the president consisted of a faked memo, whereas the case against Tom DeLay consists of an imaginary one.
Charges like these are not brought at random. They are brought against people who pose the greatest threat to liberals. (What am I? Miss Congeniality?)
The only difference between the Stalin-era prosecutions — also enthusiastically defended by liberals — and these prosecutions is that it's possible to get acquitted here. But the validity of the charges is about the same.
The only way to stop the left's criminalization of conservatism is to start indicting liberals.
It wasn't calm persuasion that convinced liberals the independent counsel law was a bad idea. It was an independent prosecutor investigating Bill Clinton (who actually was a felon!).
It wasn't logical argument that got them to admit that — sometimes — women do lie about sexual harassment. It was half a dozen women accusing Bill Clinton of groping, flashing or raping them.
It wasn't the plain facts that got liberals to admit that, sometimes, "objective" news reports can be biased. It was the appearance of Fox News Channel.
Can't we rustle up a right-wing prosecutor to indict Teddy Kennedy for Mary Jo Kopechne's drowning? Unlike the cases against Limbaugh and DeLay, Mary Jo's death was arguably a crime, and we could probably prove it in court.
Thursday, December 15, 2005
WHY CAN'T I GET ARRESTED?
Posted by
The Game
at
11:03 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
I can't imagine that it would EVER happen, but just what if . . .
Rove was indicted? What would you say? Really?
The left can be really tiresome with their traveling "get Rove Show". Liberals never have a response for the posts as they are presented. Jim just sidesteps the question, as do all the leftwing Kool Aid drinkers do when presented with facts.
http://www.noagenda.org/ Visit this link Jim and defend these acts by your lunatic alien leaders.
... "nanu nanu".
There really is no debate here...corrupt, immoral lefties make up charges about the right because that is the ONLY way for them to get power. Ann is pointing out brilliantly that almost none of these charges come to anything
Then I guess OJ was innocent, too. And every Democrat accused of a crime is innocent, if no charges stuck. It has nothing to do with guilt, and everything to do with privilege and power. Anyway, as much as Limbaugh is a fucktard, whats wrong with popping pain pills to pass the time? Delay is a way different story. I already said, the one charge they dropped due to ex post facto, was a law they created SPECIFICALLY because of Delay's abuses. I dont know that dozens of women accused Clinton of flashing/groping/etc, but I was of the opinion that women make that shit up for any number of reasons, as you are well aware of.
Oh, and tell ANNIE that nobody has brought any charges against her, since they are all fake, cuz she is insignificant to anyone of power.
The Republics are the majority in the House and Senate. THEY set the agenda. Bush is in the White House. HE sets the agenda.
The Democrats have ideas and alternatives. But since they are not in the majority they can't set the agenda. So they are "obstructionists."
The Republic agenda is to try to maneuver Democrats and other moderates to pass dangerous provisions of the Patriot Act. The Republic agenda IS NOT to fix the Alternative Minimum Tax law. Can you feel it? It's coming to a tax return near you. But even though both the House and Senate have passed versions of the AMT reform law, Mr. agenda-setting Frist says there is no time to get it passed.
EH, I asked YOU a question. Where the f**k is YOUR response?
Game, do you know why Ken Starr, the Republican-controlled House, and the FBI spent $60 million "investigating" Bill and Hilary Clinton and all they could come up with was a blow job? Because all of the rest of it was made up. $60 million dollars and eight f**king years to get him. A blow job. (Well, actually I think it was eight or nine blow jobs, but who's counting?)
So don't tell me about "lefties make up charges about the right".
I just joined the Conservative Web Ring and found your site through them. I love Ann Coulter. This was a great column.
By the way I grew up in Racine, Wisconsin and my dad used to work in Milwaukee.
"The Democrats have ideas and alternatives"?
Huh?
Jim, what (D)efeatist ideas and alternatives are you referring too? The only idea I've heard from you all is running away like frightened rabbits. Enlighten us.
I get long-winded in my posts sometimes, and maybe that's why some of you continually ignore or misconstrue what I say. So I'm going to chop it up into small pieces so you can comprehend it more easily...
Game,
I don't think even a masters in statistics can count the number of times that I have stipulated ON THIS BLOG that Clinton lied under oath and that was bad. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that I have never specifically said that Bush lied even though I have said that members of his administration have said things that were not true when knew they were not true.
You know, I have a lot of issues with Bill Clinton's presidency and with Bill Clinton himself. I'm angry at him becasue he successfully navigated through the onslaught of flase charges from those who considered him somehow illigitimate only to hand them victory because he couldn't keep his dick in his pants.
But Clinton managed to clearly win two presidential elections, serve eight years, work WITH the opposition party who impeached him, and leave the country better off than when he was inaugurated.
You can only wish for the same from Bush.
Jim,
no one can argue that Clinton was probably the best politician ever...he knew how to shake the right hands and kiss the right ass.
I do believe that there was a lot of slimmy shit going on...there were a lot of charges just as there are now, but I have posted a few times all the CONVICTIONS of different people in his administration. Hey, OJ got off and everyone knows he did it....many child molesters commit many crimes before they are caught...that is what happened to Clinton....
Do you really believe he was guilt free for his whole political life...people have been saying he is dirty from the beginning...they are all making this stuff up?
Hey, just to comment something. I believe most politicians are pretty slimy, and we can only count on very few to actually do whats right. However, at what point do we draw the line between personal and public behavior? Ted Kennedy is a drunk, elitist pork-barreling scumbag, but(depending on your politics) really gets the job done, professionally. When politicians DONT belong to this club, they are vilified and isolated. I bring this up because Wisconsins greatest Senator died this weekend, and he was one of the most isolated politicians, ever....William Proxmire.
Game,
I know you posted information on people supposedly connected to Bush that you say have been convicted. I'd appreciate it if you could remind me of where.
I'm a bit more informed now than when you posted because I'm almost finished with "The Hunting of the President."
For instance, did you know that Linda Tripp, of all people, said that Katherine Willey was a liar and had plotted with Tripp on how best to seduce Clinton? That Willey was trying to sell her "story" as a book because her husband had left her in debt after embezzling from his clients?
Did you know that the Clintons lost money on Watergate? I got lots more.
Jim:
When you examine the details a bit closer, you will be able to see why perhaps a few women did plan to seduce Clinton.
Because of the well known fact that Clinton was out for sex with any woman that would have him, others' took advantange of his reputation for being a slut.
Think about it...no President who has been upstanding in his family life/bedroom character has had women trying to 'set him up' as being promiscuous.
If a person gains a reputation for that sort of thing, then they can expect several to take advantage of that weakness. The bottom line is that Clinton created his own rep, so is ultimately responsible for anyone who did take advantage of that. He was supposed to set an example...which he failed miserably at doing. In gov service, or the military, the higher ranking person always carries the burden of the most responsibility. Just think about it.
Post a Comment