Talking about
them...
helping... 
You think that I am talking about this story...
Nope, I'm talking about this story...
Two US newspapers gave the terrorists information on another successful program that stopped terrorism...
How many terror plots have we stopped here?
Who knows, atleast one this week...and the liberal media keeps working for the terrorists every chance they get...
Why did you need to give the specifics of the program?
If you had to tell the story, why not just say that the US was using bank records to track terrorists...what benefit came out of telling the terrorist exactly which international banking system we were tracking...
It makes you think, that with the way liberals think...(meaning stopping us from using the wiretaps and now this), how many terrror attacks would there have been if Al Gore would have won in 2000?
Bush has finnaly got our intelligence community working and stopping terrorists, and the liberal media does whatever it can to stop us...
Posts
9 comments:
If you guys look, the dude bottom center is a dead ringer for game.
If Al Gore was in charge, Saddam Hussein, a Stalinist hero to the left, would still be terrorizing his people today. And another 500,000 people would have died from the sanctions.
"But but but.. the soldiers! Oil! ...uh, um body armor!"
well done again jason..
and rhyno is full of it
OK, I lied. Game doesnt have long hair, like that.
I have an idea, lets secure the borders and ports and keep working on stuff like this(suspect as it is). Instead of killing masses in an occupation. Better way to spend our money in my book and far less deadly for our troops which I support not getting killed in another countries civil war.
By the way Jason, use google and see who put Saddam in power and supported him for o so many years and then get a little humility...a quality sadly lacking on this bluster and bitch blog.
was that the liberal artistic creative side of you Ron?
using three "b" worlds in a string like that ends my argument, I'm so embarrassed
ron--
Hussein was aided in the 1980s by the west so Iran wouldn't become a superpower. The wackos wouldn't be in power in Iran to this day if Jimmah Carter didn't sing kumbayah and let revolutionaries take over, just like he did with Yemen, Eithiopia, Angola, Afghanistan, and Nicaragua.
However, by 2003, there's no rational reason to keep Hussein around. There is room to critique how we went to war-- the administration didn't have their facts straight, and they planned poorly. But to say even if everything went perfectly without the delays we have experienced, you still would have supported a Stalinist like Hussein-- baffles me.
Of course, the left tells me what a great secular progressive Hussein was, as if they venerate the "progressive" aspects of his cruel dictatorship. That's because they want the same here-- use big government to force "the sheeple" to do the left's will.
Post a Comment