Why were we doing this?
Liberals should be outraged over this.
They get mad when the government listens to terrorists on the phone...
Listening illegally to royalty should be evey worse.
FACT: Liberals could care less, because it was Bill Clinton who was President and not GWB. Liberals have selective ethics and morality.
Sunday, December 10, 2006
US bugged Diana's phone on night of death crash
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
8 comments:
How is that a fact? Back it up, Game. EVERYone should be outraged about that.
ME
is it in the front page of the paper?
are there press conferences...
like there were with Foley?
You look so foolish on this one, Game. While spying on Princess Diana without permission from the British government is an embarassment, it is only that.
See, I don't know if you know this, but Diana WAS NOT a US Citizen. She was also not a resident of the US. Furthermore, she was not in the US at the time of the bugging. Therefore, she was not protected by the US Constitution, FISA or any other US law.
So I say what the so-called liberal media says. BFD!
So a press conference makes something fact? Journalists never lie?
ME
Game,
Don't try to get intellectual with the likes of Jim. Jim doesn't get it. Talk about handouts, rip the "neocons", stuff a ballot box, overlook crimes committed by people with the name "William Jefferson", and talk about unioniziing everything, but don't talk about results. Only then, can you have a conversation with the likes of Jim.
Listening illegally to royalty
Where did you get that it was illegal?
It is listening to US citizens that is a violation of the constitution and the listening that us moonbats are upset about. Listen to all the terrorists you want. If they are in or calling the US there is an easy convient way to make it constitutional.
Here's the update: The US did not spy on Di. Don't know what that does to anyone's impression of Clinton . . .
Post a Comment