I watched a report by O'Reilly last night where he has someone ask "peace loving liberals" questions.
When asked about what will happen in Iraq if we leave, Tim Robins told the reported to enlist in the army...very intelligent answer.
When Jane Fonda was asked what she thought of the million people killed after we left Vietnam, she said that if we wouldn't have caused that situation, no one would have been killed. So basically, she (as most liberals do) was blaming America for what happened. In her mental disorder liberal mind, Americans killed those million plus people.
There were other comments, and pictures of damage and vandalism.
Its always fun to watch liberals act in their true colors when they feel safe enough to do so.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
What liberals think
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
5 comments:
Here's a question they should have asked Robbins or Fonda:
"Is it hard to breath with your head up your ass all the time?"
Liberals feel guilt for every event that happens on the globe -- except for the consequences of their own actions, from foreign policy to social engineering.
George Clooney, for example, will make a big fuss about Sudan, trying to make the west feel guilty. (Of course, he won't explain this in context of Revolutionary Islam, nor will he bring up the thousands of jihadists Saddam trained for battle there.) But liberals feel no guilt about not succeeding in Iraq. I don't understand the mentality. If we sent troops into Sudan, implemented regime change, and lost a few thousand people fighting over a decade, would the left really be supportive of it? Or would they make up a conspiracy theory about greedy westerners trying to steal Sudan's limitless natural resources?
The phenonenon is narcissism. "Look at ***me!** I am caring and sensitive! I am so good!" Thinking about the consequences of their actions is too much like their stereotype of an evil businessman for liberals to take seriously.
I'm sure I speak for all liberals when I say that Tim Robbins and Jane Fonda are two of the most respected and revered voices of liberalism. As figures of power in our government and as officials of our political party, their words compel us to kneel at their feet and be awed by every syllable they utter.
Uh, NOT.
Could it be that JIM is embarrassed by the fact that the liberal media seems to fawn over everything these “idols” tend to say?
Or maybe he’s embarrassed because the leaders of his party compel these professional pretenders to testify before various congressional hearings, thereby imparting their vast knowledge and wisdom onto the common people.
Or maybe he’s embarrassed because these spokespersons of the left do sway so many that share his beliefs.
Or maybe he’s just embarrassed by the fact that he shares so many of the beliefs held by these fanatical, outspoken, lunatics.
Blamin'
I'm embarassed by none of the above.
What liberal media? And what media besides Fox "News" even shows these people on TV? Not embarassed.
"leaders of his party compel these professional pretenders to testify before various congressional hearings". Seen any supoenas? I haven't. Don't know what you are talking about. Not embarassed.
"spokespersons of the left do sway so many". I doubt it. Not embarassed.
I don't necessarily share their beliefs. I don't know their beliefs. I don't pay any attention to them. Wingnuts are the only ones who pay attention to them. And if I did share their beliefs, why in the world would I be embarassed about them? And if they disagree with you, that proves that they are NOT lunatics. Not embarassed.
Post a Comment