What is wrong with this?
The American people always say they want a "real" candidate, one that they can relate too...
They always say AFTER the election that "if only they acted like that before the election" when referring to Al Gore or Bob Dole doing comedy bits.
So here is someone doing that, we will see if the American people actually want what they say they want.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
NO JOKE: MCCAIN ANNOUNCES ON LETTERMAN!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
I'm skeptical of McCain these days. The McCain "brand" used to be the feisty Teddy Roosevelt type who stood against the special interests.
These days McCain stands for things like the al-Queda bill of rights, tax hikes, McCain-Feingold, obstructing the nomination of originalist judges, and John McCain. Plus McCain looks world-weary and feeble, even for his age.
I am absolutely not a fan of cuddling terrorists and bashing people like Don Rumsfeld. I'm also suspicious of people who bash "special interests," because the term usually does not refer to special interests like trial lawyers, teacher unions, environmental wackos, Big Labor, race radicals and so forth. Nope, the term is commonly used to bash honest companies and internnational trade, two things I support.
So I'll pass on McCain. Romney and Giuliani share more of my priorities on defense and econ matters.
I was not making a comment on McCain personally or if I want to vote for him...I agree for the most part with what you say...I was just talking about this story...
Whatever the reason for going into Iraq, it was Rumsfeld more that anyone else who is responsible for f**king it up. I'll give McCain credit for calling it like it is. Rumsfeld may indeed be the worst SedDef in US history.
I'm not a fan of McCain because he has caved on many principles he previously held. He used to be "independent." Now he's just another candidate.
"Rumsfeld may indeed be the worst SedDef in US history."
Considering the number of American deaths on D-Day, perhaps not.
Post a Comment