Sunday, April 15, 2007

Liberal Bias For What They DON’T Say, Too


For the last few weeks I have been watching two stories that, were they about Conservatives or Republicans, would have been scandals that would have shaken the rafters of the MSM. But, since these stories are about two favored Liberals, one old and one newly minted, we have seen no faux outrage, no shocked commentary, no calls for heads on pikes to be posted at the entrance to Congress, and no calls for resignations. Oh, the stories were reported all right, but all sensationalism was eschewed with the usual extrapolation to the level of a “culture of corruption” cast aside for a straight, newsy style atypical to their normal means against Republicans.

These two stories and the lack of passionate coverage of them by the MSM shows that the MSM employs as much liberal bias in what they chose not to cover as they do in what they chose to go ahead and focus upon.

The two stories I’ve been following are:

Story one: Dem Senator Resigns Post Because Husband Makes Money on US Contracts She Controls
Story Two: Senator’s Aide Brings Senator’s Gun Into Senate Offices

2 comments:

PCD said...

Democrats are just juvenile delinquents. Look at the junket rampage the Democrats are on, inclucing Gwen Moore.

http://www.examiner.com/a-675671~Congressional_junkets_picking_up_steam.html

blamin said...

Of course as a supporter of the 2nd amendment, I don't have the least problem with this "aide" bringing a gun into the office - as long as he was certified to carry said gun, other than the fact that it's pure hypocrisy if you're a Dem.

I'm just curious as to the Senators stance on "gun-control" law. Does he humm (& I do mean hummmm) the party line? Or does he break out and vote his consceious? (with the party's blessings and a few quid-pro-quos?)