I'd just like to put this up here for the liberals who just SAY global warming is going to kill us all (in 10 years if you love algore)...
Remember, liberals simply SAY things as if they are facts and then say there is no debate about it...probably because they are not good at debating actual facts.
There is NO WAY there is ANY facts about the future of global warming, how to slow it down or stop it or exactly what is causing it...
But THIS is the big liberal problem...not Iran saying Israel is going to be taken off the map
Not a plot to blow up JFK...no...global warming...
Honestly, how are we supposed to take liberals seriously?
Sunday, June 03, 2007
They call this a consensus?
Posted by The Game at 10:41 AM
Labels: global warming, liberal thought
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Game--
We're simply not understanding the nuances and complexities of non-authoritarian discourse and community-minded consciousness!
Seriously, liberals are just loaded with guilt and will apologize for anything to anybody. It doesn't get more complex than this.
They think *we* are the ones to blame for harming mother earth with science and technology, and *we* the ones to blame for making people want to put a Jihad on their neighbors. In the Church of Liberalism, we are all in bondage to sin and cannot free ourselves. Repent!
Hyperbole and lies. Nobody says that global warming is going to kill us all, least of all in 10 years. Your use of this number displays your ignorance on the subject.
Of course there are no "facts" about the future. There is no fact that the sun will rise on Tuesday. But science and observation make it a pretty good bet.
You may be surprised but intelligent people like liberals can actually focus on more than one important issue at a time.
Honestly, how are we supposed to take wingnuts seriously?
I don't know Jim, you take algore seriously...
From the mouth of king wing-nut:
"Some of the leading scientists are now saying we may have as little as 10 years before we cross a kind of point-of-no-return, beyond which it's much more difficult to save the habitability of the planet in the future," Gore says.
Read the fucking quote and try to comprehend what it actually means.
It's a serious, meaningful, and important statement, and it is NOT saying that we will all die in 10 years. The statement itself is verifiably true. Some of the leading scientists ARE saying this. What they are saying may not be provably true, but MANY, MANY top scientists agree believe it.
I have a question, is Jim sane?
Try this one, Jim,
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=c47c1209-233b-412c-b6d1-5c755457a8af
Jim,
"It's a serious, meaningful, and important statement, and it is NOT saying that we will all die in 10 years. The statement itself is verifiably true. Some of the leading scientists ARE saying this. What they are saying may not be provably true, but MANY, MANY top scientists agree believe it."
What's the difference between verifying and proving? And to say we only have ten years to turn it all around sounds like death to me. What happens if we don't turn it around in ten years? People start dying, right? How is this interpretation not correct? Really Jim, it's OK to think AlGore is a pig's ass. You can still be a liberal.
Marshall, did you read the phrase "beyond which it's much more difficult"?
Marshall, you seem to be an intelligent person with a certain point of view. I most often have a differing point of view, but I can respect your view until you ridicule a person who has more intelligence, grace, courage, education, empathy, curiosity, respect than 100 George W. Bushes could ever hope for in their wildest dreams.
Your irrational fear of Al Gore is beginning to surpass that of your fear of Bill Clinton.
"...but I can respect your view until you ridicule a person who has more intelligence, grace, courage, education, empathy, curiosity, respect than 100 George W. Bushes could ever hope for in their wildest dreams."
Jimmy! Are you going on tour with this comedy act? Gore shows our current president NO respect. He doesn't empathize with anyone who disagrees, his education fails him if he believes what he says about global warming, courage to spout crap is unimpressive to me, I've never seen him dance so I can't speak to his grace, and his intelligence is in question if he actually thinks global warming is more of a threat than millions of radical bedouins who'd be more than happy to cut his head off. I don't fear the Goracle, I fear those who think he's worth the time of day.
Post a Comment