Thursday, September 27, 2007

Dem's promises on the war

I heard a sound bite this morning from Obama saying he would get the troops out.......by 2013 (which is what all politicians do, promise something one year after their term). What do you think about that liberals? You should be soooooooooooo mad at Obama.

14 comments:

jhbowden said...

Interestingly, today the Dems are promising at least five more years of war for the greedy Jews, the oil companies, Hilterburton, the illuminati, the military industrial complex, and the PNAC!!!! YEEEAGH!

Which isn't surprising, given Hillary, Biden, Edwards etc. were big supporters of the war when the polls were 70% in favor of it. The moonbats will believe anything they're told by Olbermann, Kos, Weasely Clark, etc., so this isn't a political problem for the Democrats. Clinton is saying she was duped by Bush, as if she didn't read thoroughly the reasons for going. Unfortunately Bill Clinton's wife, there is video of Hillary bragging about supporting the removal of Saddam, based on not Bush, but on her "ten years of experience" with dealing with the problem. And the Dems think Bush is arrogant?

Anyway, the moonbats will slurp up any bullshit excuse the Dems make up to cover their asses, and anyone with a memory will be damned as an enemy of The People, a hater of children, etc. etc. Which isn't new to me-- I remember getting attacked by hash-style Neanderthals when I argued that Iraq did NOT have nuclear and biological weapons in 2002, while most people agreed with Clinton and Bush at the time.

Andy said...

Obama didn't say that. Richardson was the only one to make that promise.

Kucinich and Gravel may have but I don't pay attention to them.

hashfanatic said...

Actually, I'm disgusted with all of them on the issue, except for Richardson, Biden, and Kucinich, and there is no way the neocon power structure will permit any of them to win, anyway.

The conservatard choice for president is Hillary, despite all whining to the contrary...

She is number two on AIPAC's contribution list and the oligarchs eagerly await her coronation.


"Which isn't new to me-- I remember getting attacked by hash-style Neanderthals when I argued that Iraq did NOT have nuclear and biological weapons in 2002, while most people agreed with Clinton and Bush at the time."

More shell-game tomfoolery from our resident pseudo-intellectual...

Not only was I fully aware that there were no WMDs in Iraq in 2002, I firmly believed (and still believe) that any nation has a right to have whatever weaponry or energy sources at their disposal, particularly when your land is within reach of murderous Zionist aggressors and their puppets.

You (meaning America, Israel) have no right to attempt to control the defense policies of other lands. Do not undermine the survival of the nations, and you will have nothing to worry about.

Jim said...

Seems to me that only an uniformed wing nut would not understand that 2013 is the year in which the next president's term ENDS and that the question was, "Can you promise to have all US military out of Iraq by the end of your first term?"

No prudent person would make that pledge. Most of them DID say that they have plans to get the troops out and that their goal is to get the troops out by the end of their first term. But they can't promise that all the troops will be out because there are too many unknowns.

Game, get a grip. Please think before you type. This one is a loser from the get-go.

The Game said...

far left wing wackos like yourself want them out NOW, NOW, NOW!!!!!!
Parades, protests....NOW!!!!
2013 is not now...my point is simple and easy to understand...

Jim said...

far left wing wackos like yourself Demonstrating once again that you haven't got a clue. Have you ever read a word written by me that suggested that troops be removed immediately? Have you ever seen anything by me suggesting that I support Bill Richardson?

Didn't think so.

Oh, and I thought your test last week established that I'm not a left wing wacko.

Your point is simple, for sure. It's simply inane. You think you have proved something based on a misunderstanding of the US Constitution.

hashfanatic said...

"far left wing wackos like yourself want them out NOW, NOW, NOW!!!!!!"

Well, I do...

The troops have also contributed to Ron Paul's campaign far beyond any other presidential campaign, Rethug or Dem...

Are you calling the troops in Iraq wackos, game?

Are you like Rush Limbaugh?

PCD said...

Hash, you, andy, and jim are whackos who would excuse any democrat of murder.

Here's a little refutation for you BDS sufferers on the reasons for the war:

http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/
2007/09/27/bush-aznar-pre-iraq-war-
memo/

Choke on it you America haters.

Andy said...

Nah, I only excuse President Clinton of killing Vince Foster. That's where I draw the line.

hashfanatic said...

"http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/
2007/09/27/bush-aznar-pre-iraq-war-
memo/"

Fudgie, this slop has nothing to do with anything...

Maybe I was a bit too rough with that riding crop and the bacon grease.

PCD said...

hash, you can't deal with the truth. You can't handle the truth. You need psychological help.

PCD said...

Phil, you are just a degenerate who can't refute this translation either.

When the left can't refute, they smear.

hashfanatic said...

That's why I use the bacon grease on you, fudgie!

Scorpion said...

old hash...oh no Obama must be really looking forward to the future meetings with bizarro-world..as the
comedy crew seems to be flying "high" with their feeble attempts at debate with the RIGHT ON posts........maybe oh no Obama
could share a cup of tea...old hash...