Monday, September 10, 2007

Petraeus speaks

I'll give the links and the liberal response:
Petraeus Talks of Troop Withdrawal
Well, liberals want troop withdrawal, but since Patraeus is a puppet for Bush, a troop withdrawal must be bad.

Iran fighting 'proxy war in Iraq'...
How can that be? I thought the Iraqis were fighting us? Why would Iran fight us?
Military objectives of surge 'are in large measure being met'...
Premature drawdown would be 'devastating'...
Believes U.S. can reduce forces to pre-surge levels by next summer -- to about 130,000 troops... MORE...
PETRAEUS TESTIMONY...
CROCKER TESTIMONY...
SLIDES [PDF]...
Surge to peak at 172,000 in mid-October...
Hearing starts with Democratic criticism...
CINDY SHEEHAN ARRESTED AT HEARING...
VIDEO: CODE PINK PROTESTERS ESCORTED OUT...

Actually we can sum this up....The surge and Bush are doing a good job, the only thing that can defeat us is the Democratic Party. Let the people who know what they are talking about run this, you stick to gay marriage and ID cards for illegals. All the people on the ground say the surge is working, I know Democrats are sad to see us doing well, but facts are facts.
They also say getting out early will be a disaster. That doesn't bother Democrats since they killed millions in Vietnam and didn't care about that.
Why are these crazy women protesting?
What are they protesting?
That someone who has a clue is giving a report?
Once again, Bush and the Right are Right, liberals and Democrats ideas, destructive for the whole world.
Now, these are facts given by Petraeus and others who have a clue...the liberals here can type sentences that SAY Republicans destroy things, but they can never back it up with anything.
Here are 12 links of facts.

7 comments:

Jim said...

Hmmm, where to start.

Well, liberals want troop withdrawal, but since Patraeus is a puppet for Bush, a troop withdrawal must be bad.

This is a stupid statement. Who, besides you, says that a troop withdrawal must be bad?

Iran fighting 'proxy war in Iraq'...

Maybe. What's your point?

Military objectives of surge 'are in large measure being met'...

Can't think of anybody who disputes this. What's your point? The "strategy" of the surge was to allow enough security for the government to reconcile and meet a number of milestones. These milestones have not been met. The strategy is not working so far.

Believes U.S. can reduce forces to pre-surge levels by next summer -- to about 130,000 troops... MORE...

Wow! Back to where we were when the surge started. Wow! Did you note that a major factor is the readiness of the military to actually field more that 130,000 troops any longer?

That doesn't bother Democrats since they killed millions in Vietnam and didn't care about that.

That's a slanderous lie.

12 links of facts? The civilian casualty number since the surge started as presented by Petraeus does not sqare with a number of other sources, and yet Petraeus will not divulge the military's methodology.

What facts?

Marshal Art said...

"The civilian casualty number since the surge started as presented by Petraeus does not sqare with a number of other sources, and yet Petraeus will not divulge the military's methodology."

That's because Petraeus is a big fat liar liar pants on fire! HIS numbers just HAVE to be the wrong ones. Of course, that's the ticket!

Jim said...

I'm not calling him a liar. I'm asking why he doesn't present his methodology. Quit whining Marshall.

I can tell you for a fact that the surge has reduced civilian casualties to zero. But I'm not going to tell you how I arrived at that number.

PCD said...

Jim relies on DNC/MoveOn.org/Think Progress propaganda as his methodology.

Petraeus had his boots on the ground and is a 1st person eye witness.

Who is more honest and believable? Petraeus.

Remember that Jim got caught denying his favorite site, Think Progress, concering Democrat calls for impeachment, etc. IE. Jim is a serial liar for the left.

Realism said...

And sheriff Baca is a Republican

PCD said...

Phil,

Every time you say that you are admitting you have no refutation, but as a smartass you are trying to be relevant and act out your superiority complex. You are getting quite worthless.

hashfanatic said...

That's our fudgie! That's why he gets booted out of every place (but here, of course...)

How hysterically funny is it that Petraeus claimes he has no idea whether or not the Iraq occupation will make Americans safer or not?

It's not as though Americans are his concern, anyway.