Thursday, October 18, 2007

Rush update

UPDATE: $2,100,100 TOP BID FOR DEM LETTER BASHING LIMBAUGH...Largest charity bid in the history of EBAY? Jay Leno's Harley went for $800,000...
TWIST: SEN. REID THANKS RUSH FOR AUCTION...
AND THE WINNER IS: BETTY CASEY...
Rush has raised over $850,000 for the troops...
Probably from evil coorperate execs, CEO's, you know, the racist eveil while males of the Republican party.
What does the Left do for the troops?
Oh ya, I forgot
They:
1. Falsy claim they murder innocent civilians
2. compare them to pol pot and nazi's
3. Say they are only in the army because they are stupid
4. Lie about what they have done
5. Claim they torture civilians
6. Say they are incompetent and failures
7. Try to cut their funding
I think we get the point.

30 comments:

Anonymous said...

He was on Hanity&Colmes tonight. So, Rush-Hanity-Bill ....all come together. Talk about the axis of....!!

Jim said...

Game,

Items 1-7 are total lies. Other than that...oh there is no other than that.

It's just made up lying crap.

The Game said...

no jim...
Lets go over number one...
I'll just prove you wrong on the first one
John Murtha is on tape, at a press conference saying US soldiers murdered civilians...we have now learned that he was wrong...and some of the soldiers are even thinking of going after Murtha due to his lack of professionalism, slander and being an asshole.
That is just number one
do we have to bring up clips of Kerry lying under oath, or any of the others....

Jim said...

Clips of Kerry lying under oath? Sure, let's see 'em.

Murtha? This is old shit. Murtha didn't invent this. He may have been wrong, but he didn't invent it out of some sort of malicious intent. To imply otherwise is lying.

Pete Fanning said...

Oh, and over at the Democratic Underground, they're working overtime at getting the auction "reported" to eBay as "inflammatory" and "highly offensive".

Like that will work.

PCD said...

Oh, Jim, like Gore got caught only contributing $150. to charity while making $180,000 as VP and not to mention all the money he made from his Occidental holding, etc. Lefties for the most part are tightwads with their own money.

Points 1 to 7 are well proven, Jim. You are the one lying, starting with constantly lying to yourself.

Someone point this out to Jim as he can't bear seeing some one stand up to him and tell him the truth to his face.

Game, you can show all the clips of Kerry lying and Jim will keep his eyes shut, fingers in his ears, trying hard to remember the Think Progress counter to what he is being subjected to.

The Game said...

I heard this morning the auction was up to over 2 million dollars...can someone confirm?

The Game said...

It's up to 2.1 million...
God is it cool to see such a great American patriot support the troops...and watch liberals look bad as usual...
Any other conservatives the Democrats want to try and silence and take away their right to free speech?
After all is said and done, Democrats live up to every single stereotype...

PCD said...

Except for Bill Gates that plays both sided of the political fence, WHAT HAVE LIBERALS DONATED FROM THEIR OWN POCKETS?

The Game said...

they don't...
everytime there is a study done, conservatives and conservative states give a much greater percentage of their income than liberals.
Because conservatives have it right...you give what you want to, when you want and to whom you want...that way people can be happy about the money they give, see it in action, see it work, and usually it actually helps someone who needs it.
Liberals just take your money out of your check, throw it around and waste it, no one cares, the people who keep getting the free hand-outs think they are entitled to it, and they don't get better because of it.

None said...

How much is this war? Lets see.. $1 Trillion minus $2 million. More balancing the budget the conservative way.

This "victory dance" by Game just smacks of Blackwater/mercenaries providing aid to people in NOLA.

What have liberals donated? Umm... Google.. PCP. I found this great website, www.google.com. There you can do what is called a "search" and you will find the amount of money liberals have donated. Its really simple. I think even a druggie like PCP or Rush could handle it.

"conservatives and conservative states give a much greater percentage of their income than liberals."

Have you ever given this any thought besides some rightwing talking point? Come on Game.. for two seconds.. just think about what a possible reason for this might be.

The Game said...

You tell me..I'd like to see what DailyKos and other moonbats think

You might need to calm down first before you answer...

None said...

DailyKos?

What is that anyway?

PCD said...

Parkie's charitable contributions = $0. Probably the rest of the libs commenting here give less than 1% of their gross income to charities, and I don't count political contributions as charity.

The Game said...

Whatever it is...the FACT is that conservatives give more of their own money than liberals...and liberals expect the govt to do it..
So really, they are taking your money...they just don't let you decide how it gets spent...and it usually gets spent like crap.

None said...

Thank God my financial adviser is here to read my income statement. PCP, do you have any drug companies that I should be investing in?

"calm down"?
Dont get too self involved Game. You're the last person I'm going to get upset about. Nobody here (other than alcoholics and drug addicts) take you seriously.

"Whatever it is.."
Do you know what you are even arguing about? That almost sounds like your gem the other day, "I'll just agree with what I agree..."

As for charitable contributions... Think about what they are. Or even how the "study" youre pretending to quote is conducted. Are they citing average or median contributions? What about say teachers? Is their value to society reflected in pay? What about people who do not donate, but volunteer? What about poor people? Are they bad people because they do not have the income to donate? Suppose a single mother works two jobs just to cover rent and health care.. but votes for a Dem? She is somehow thought of as less of a person... If you want to get high and mighty about a study, perhaps its a good idea to think about what it may or may not be saying.

Speaking of Rush:
"[W]e found out who was writing it and made a couple phone calls to the person writing it. And we said, 'You know what? We're going to find out where your kids go to school..."

Its always touching when rightists can threaten kids. They've been at it for a couple weeks now... but this has to be the high water mark. Veto SCHIP, smear a couple of kids promoting it.. and now Rush.. Brings back memories of Cheney and Hardball.

hashfanatic said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
The Game said...

parklife, you are so lame...
your drowning with lead plated pants...
"what about teachers"
God damn is that lame
Look at the excuses flow...you don't make sense...your the new hash...annoying and worthless.

hashfanatic said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jim said...

you don't make sense

Apparently he's talking over your head. Makes perfect sense.

blamin said...

Rush made a calculated maneuver and won!

He new he was right, he new he had the facts on his side. The LibDemPimps miscalculated and thought the usual “no questions asked” MSM would pull them through. EEEEENNNCCHH wrong!

It must suck really bad to be a leftist and rely on the usual suspects to carry the "debate" for ya!

Watch the scrambling, see the “damage control”, and observe the dumbasscrats attempting to “turn” this around.

They can’t!!!

Ya see there’s a little thing (that liberals hate) called history!

The history shows that Rush has constantly, and whole heartadley supported our fighting men & women; the history of the Dems is not quite so good!!! Most especially if they think there’s a political advantage to be had. There’s no other way to say it, other than TRAITORS.

trai-tor: A person who betrays his country, a cause, or a trust, esp. one who commits treson.

trea-son:. Violation of allegiance toward one's country, esp. The betrayal of one's own county by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.

Did I make that clear? I'm sorry, I hate a traitor, I look at the sacrifices of our young and I look at the "arm chair quarterbacks that haven't a clue", that if they would study just "a little" of history with a clear open mind; would have a clue.

What scum sucking MF's, who’s only concern is more power for the next election and who would readily throw our soldier’s “under the bus” if it would advance your agenda. UnFckingbelvblfckwads!

Jacklegpissantsidesaddlesitting - weenies!
.

Anonymous said...

Blamin,
Are you ok dude? I like your passion. But words mean only so much, right? What makes you think that dems are not patriotic people?

"arm chair quarterbacks that haven't a clue" - Are you talking about those who didn't serve like Bush and Rush? Just curious.

Jim said...

No, american, he must be talking about Batiste, Eaton, Shinsecki, Zinni, Pace, and a host of others.

Jim said...

Oh, I forgot Sanchez.

The Game said...

Blamin, right on.
I don't think liberals are able to understand that constantly beating up on your country, your military and soldiers brings comfort to the enemy...

hashfanatic said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
blamin said...

What makes you think that dems are not patriotic people?

Just their words.

I probably should have made it clear, I was only talking about dem leadership. You know, the ones you people support.

Rush is absolutely correct. The dem leadership is invested in defeat. After all, if the war is considered won, the dems have nothing, and I do mean nothing to run on. It must suck really bad to be a dem!

hashfanatic said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jim said...

constantly beating up on your country, your military and soldiers brings comfort to the enemy

But nobody does that so it's a false premise.

blamin said...

But nobody does that so it's a false premise.

You're kidding, right? You can't possibly make that statement with a straight face.