Friday, October 19, 2007

An unlikely treasure-trove of donors for Clinton

Now, the sheeple will say this shows what great support she has all over the country, in all areas.
People who have a clue and can remember history at all will see this as more sleezy cheating and lying.
I could go over the list of all sleezy and illegal things Bill did to get millions of dollars from Chineese businessmen, but liberals don't care about that anyway.

The conservatives here see this story for what it is, same old, same old...or same crap, different Clinton.

Here is a small list of what just Hillary has already been caught in:
Charting Hsu & Associates nationwide (state and federal) campaign contributions
Hillary loves fugitive moneymen

23 comments:

Andy said...

You got spanked on your earlier smear attempt so you bring up old news. Pretty pathetic.

The Game said...

nope, I have link after link...from the last one too.
Someone who supports a family like the Clinton's, even after getting caught time and time again in crooked, immoral and illegal behavior is pathetic.
It means, Andy, you either have no morals yourself, you don't care about what your leaders do (which would make sense since you are a liberal), or you don't know how to think and you simply vote Dem no matter what.
It is pathetic for you, I understand, to vote for someone like Hillary, especially if you pretend you can use your brain.

Andy said...

Wow. Another post of unsubstantiated gibberish. I shouldn't expect anything less from a conservative.

The Game said...

I know, the truth hurts...

None said...

I think, what you're trying to say Game, is that we need to clean up elections in general. Make them publicly financed or something. What a crazy idea. Turn elections into something about the issues and aways from a money race. I'll agree with that.

The Game said...

Hell ya...
Why is it that Republicans get drilled for pandering to "special interests"
yet the yardstick used to measure how much support someone has is how much money they have?

PCD said...

Andy,

The old news is you being a Clintonista and using that "Old News" tactic that Car-vile used, but it don't work anymore. The Clintons are taking illegal money hand over fist and you support and condone it.

Andy said...

PCD, they share the money with me since I'm a fellow Marxist so of course I condone it.

Einstein, it's old news since Game brought it up on his blog about a week ago. His fleon presidency post was a dud and he's trying to save face.

hashfanatic said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
The Game said...

how can someone be so wrong all the time and not be locked up

Jim said...

You should know! :-)

blamin said...

I don’t expect Andy or Jim to be realistic about this.

They’re in “automatic attack dog mode”.

Come on guys – admit it! The Hilldebeast is the absolute worst all time candidate for prez in the annuals of history!

I mean, if we could just get the MSM to report her own words, she wouldn’t have a chance!

It don’t matter that the MSM won’t do anything to soil their precious Socialist candidate - Thinking people see her for exactly what she is

HC is the worst, most dangerous threat to freedom this country has faced in a long time!

Free people of the world understand this, and this abomination will not stand! Don’t get me wrong, least you believe I’m some kind of HashStalkerDude, I’m just saying that – well – “the truth will set you free”

blamin said...

=

What's her resume by the way?

Has she ever been in charge of - … aaah , anything?

Has she ever had a “real” job?

Has she ever run a business?

Has she ever done anything of substance? (Oprah like pronouncements don’t count)

Has she ever donated millions of dollars to – anything ?

Jim said...

OK, we now see blamin' is apparently on the Rudy train, spouting his talking points.

You can never honestly say this stuff if you look at and understand the history of the current president. That man was never successful at any endeavor in his entire life, with the possible exception of quitting drinking.

Blamin' you're delirious if you think the SCLM doesn't quote Senator Clinton. They quote her daily, the go on for hours about her "cackle".

Your fear of Hillary is irrational. Is it based on health care? Are you afraid of "government-run" health care, you know, like Congress gets, and the president gets, and the military gets?

Other than the rantings of lunatics, what is the basis of your fear of Clinton?

jhbowden said...

Jim---

I agree that the Clintons have many redeeming points. Hillary is a big supporter of the war on terrorism, including Operation Iraqi Freedom, despite her vocabulary in front of gullible moonbats. The Clintons also supported free trade in the 1990s, which was a major cause of the prosperity. The Clintons put more cops on the streets, threw thousands of deadbeats off welfare, passed the Defense of Marriage Act, and cut the capital gains tax twice. So they're not all bad.

I must disagree with you about Hillary's managed competition plan. On a limited scale, this works. If expanded on a scale of millions, this setup would provide a strong incentive to underprovide services for the sick and overprovide for the healthy. Any HMO that specializes would find instant ruin. I encourage you to seek the details on Hillary's plan and reflect upon them.

Jim said...

I will do that, Jason. However, are you suggesting that many insurers in the current system do not "underprovide" services for the sick"?

Scorpion said...

horrid Hillary could not really deal with bozo Bill...we really don't need either one back in Washington...

Jim said...

Childish names, Scorpion. Very telling.

blamin said...

I will do that, Jason.

Please let me know, because, the “details” have not been released.

Because so far, all we have is a bunch of “I wanna, we can/must, we’re gonna.”

Damn, you people are way too easy! I’m just waiting for the Dem candidate that promises to wipe your ass for ya! I guess we’ll see a landslide election, born on the shoulders of the “clean assed challenged voters”.

Scorpion said...

jumbled Jim...descriptive nicknames
that are RIGHT ON in their accuracy
are only childish to those who cannot accept the accuracy of the nickname...but,I do enjoy your posts from bizarro-world...note:the
accurate descriptive nickname for your posts and those who also add posts to the comedy club debating the RIGHT ON posts listed here daily...

Jim said...

Nicknames by definition are not accurate. Yours especially are merely meant to demonize and dehumanize those with whom you disagree like "nips", "krauts" and "slopes", etc. It somehow justifies in your own mind your irrational hatred of them.

hashfanatic said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Scorpion said...

jumbled one...I don't hate anyone..
but,I have seen the results of some of those tags you bring up and I NEVER USE...please stick to the comedy of your debate to these RIGHT ON posts...as my use of nicknames are still more accurate than the debate bizarro-world offers...