Monday, November 05, 2007

Feminist says Hillary Clinton plays the 'victim'

It is nice to see people catching on and calling Hillary out for her playing both sides of every fence. However, will it matter?
When she is the nominee, all the liberals who say they don't like her, all the feminists who know she is trying to use her being a woman as "strong women" and "poor helpless woman" at the same time, all the moderates who say they don't like her...what will they do?
The feminists and liberals will support her, since the feminists supported Bill, who cheated on his wife.
Liberals will, because it will be the "less of two evils."
Will just enough of these people and moderates peel off to give a conservative the win?

4 comments:

Andy said...

The key words in that article are "A prominent feminist, allied with the presidential campaign of former Sen. John Edwards..."

The Game said...

this is true...
However, this isn't the first time this has been brought up...and I would guess they run some part of NOW...
I am making the point that she is not as slick as slick Willie. He was able to play both sides of the fense on everything, she is not likeable, she can not pull it off.

Anonymous said...

Another smear attack on Hillary in a very heated political season - Nothing new in it.

Can you tell me why is there no female candidate from republican party? Or a non-white candidate?

The Game said...

What percent of blacks are allowed to be conservative? The pool is very small. However, the few blacks who do break free from the indoctrination have gone much higher in the political chain on the right. Rice, Powell, Thomas...