Monday, April 07, 2008

Hillary needs to lie to make liberal thought true

Liberal truth: When you can't find real stories to back up your claims, make them up.
It's just like college liberals who can't find any real racism, Hillary has to make up fake stories of people dying from not having health care to push her universal health care that we don't need.

I'll say it again liberals, if you have to lie to show how right your points are, maybe the world you think we live in doesn't quite exist in the completely helplessness you portray.

The woman Hillary has been talking about, mother with no health care, turned away because she couldn't pay the $100 bill, then her and her baby died.

Fact: Her baby was born dead and she died two weeks later, with health insurance, being taken care of...

Man, with all these people who just can't get health insurance, you would think she could come up with a story that was actually true.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

THE FACTS:

Clinton said she heard the story from Meigs County Deputy Sheriff Bryan Holman during a visit to Pomeroy, before the March 4 Ohio primary.

In a March 26 phone interview with The Associated Press, Holman said he had told Clinton the story in essentially the same way she was retelling it in her speeches. He said he knew the Bachtel story only second hand, and lacked several details.

The Game said...

ya?
Someone told her a BS story, she was not smart enough and didn't have staffers smart enough to check up on it...
the point being, its a made up story, the only kind that can make the liberal fantasy land seem real.

jhbowden said...

If Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Comrade Chavez tells Hillary a BS story, will she believe it?

blamin said...

Let me ‘splain what happened.

A hick sheriff told a story that Hillary instantly recognized as being useful. She decides to use it to further her own quest. Somewhere along the line, one of the thousands employed in her machine does a little research and realizes the story is bogus (as any good employee would do, when their boss is repeatedly using this story on the national stage).

Hillary becomes aware the story is bogus, but decides to use it anyway (how many times has this happened?). After all, she can just claim she was simply repeating what was told her.

So she’s either a liar, a slackard, or gullible – as Jason suggested.

I’m feeling a sense of dejavu with this story. Didn’t the Clintons (or was it their lap dog Algore?) use a similar bogus story when pushing a take over of health care?