As Democrats did in MN and all across the country in election after election, Democrats will most likely perform in a large amount of cheating and other unamerican activity to make sure they win.
Brown better win by 3-4% to make sure Dems dont steal another election.
Dem Congressman predicts 'very slow count'...
MSNBC Host: I'd Cheat To Keep Brown From Winning...
and why is this predicted:
Jim Cramer: Brown Win Tuesday Causes Huge Stock Rally...
because the core belief system and actions of liberals is harmful to a free society. Brown will signal the end of liberal dominance and a hope of a return to a free and capitalistic America
Monday, January 18, 2010
The usual Democrat election day strategy is being put into place
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
12 comments:
He is outnumbered with liberal voters by about three to one..he can't win..can he..imagine that....
Your link to a "very slow count" doesn't say anything about a very slow count. The count can't be any slower than Norm Coleman's, so if it takes 3 months, I say turnabout is fair play.
Last time I checked, Schultz wasn't a MA voter. He's also not a democratic leader. Furthermore, like every other state, MA has procedures that would prevent him from voting 10 times.
Cramer also said Lehman Brothers was solid just days before they went under.
You know it's so true. Iam looking for it to get nasty before it's over. Just watch the big purple bus of SEIU to roll in tonight. If they cant steal it the will probably try to stall swearing him in, but he should do just like Roland Burris did, and show up at the white house the day after he gets elected forcing them to swear him in. Just my two cents
Tammy
http://theelephantstrumpet-tammy.blogspot.com/
The Norm Coleman strategy would mean the Republican isn't allowed to take the seat until 6-8 months. Health care will have been passed by then.
another anon moron..It took Dems that long to steal that election..here Brown won by so much they couldn't make up that many extra votes
Dems stole no election in MN. There was never any substantiated claim of cheating, Coleman didn't accuse anyone of cheating, the many bi-partisan commissions and courts found no evidence of cheating. There was no cheating.
The entire process was procedural, and Coleman lost just about every single decision in each and every fair, non-partisan proceeding.
Norm lost the election.
Don't confuse him with facts, Jim. His bird brain knows only fear and gloating.
My point is if Coleman can hold things up for 6-8 months, why can't others use that precedent? The underlying legal beef is irrelevant. Coleman knew he lost and just wanted to delay Franken getting sworn in. But Dems have more class and would not try to block the democratic system like shameless republicants.
lmfao..really? you honestly really believe that? my God!!!
Hey Jim...a___...thanks again for the comedy responses...Conan doesn't have anything on you guys..
"lmfao..really? you honestly really believe that? my God!!!"
I don't have to "believe" it. It's an indisputable fact.
Show me any legal venue or proceeding in which there is any accusation of cheating by Dems or Franken, or any decision by ANY judge, panel of judges or election commission or official which finds that any cheating was attempted or committed.
I'm talking about this comment:
"But Dems have more class and would not try to block the democratic system like shameless republicants."
That is come hard core crazy right there..
I have done it many times before, but here is a list:
giving cigs to homeless people to vote for Gore
giving someone ten bucks to get on a bus and vote for a dem an hour before polls close
Democratic politicians kids slashing GOP tires the night before an election.
Democratic election officials counting 10,000 more votes in Milwaukee county then there were voters
ACORN helping sign up illegal voters
You think that is not stopping the process but vote fraud is doing just that
Post a Comment