SO, THREE MUSLIMS WALK INTO A PORT

Since Jim agrees with Ann Coulter, I thought I would put some of her column up here...
I just know when Jim and Ron read her words and agree, they will have to take 4 or 5 showers.

But Bush is going to need a better justification for turning over management of our ports to an Arab country than he's come up with so far

Bush's defense of the port deal is to say that "those who are questioning it" need to "step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company."

First of all, it's not "all of a sudden." The phrase you're searching for, Mr. President, is "ever since the murderous attacks of Sept. 11." The Bush administration's obstinate refusal to profile Middle Easterners has been the one massive gaping hole in national security since the 9/11 attacks — attacks that received indirect support from the United Arab Emirates.

There are at least 3,000 reasons why a company controlled by a Middle Eastern Muslim emirate should be held to a different standard than a British company. Many of these reasons are now buried under a gaping hole that isn't metaphorical in lower Manhattan.

President Bush has painted himself into a corner on this issue, and he needs a face-saving compromise to get out of it. Here's my proposal: Let Harriet Miers run the ports.

The Bush administration defended Muslims rioting over cartoons, saying, "We certainly understand why Muslims would find these images offensive." Hey, while they're at it, why don't they invite some Muslim leaders with well-known ties to terrorism to the White House for a reception? Oh wait, I forgot ... They did that right after 9/11. Yes, now I see why we must turn over our ports to the United Arab Emirates.

Needless to say, the Treason Times won't show the cartoons that have incited mass rioting around the globe. At least The New York Times has a good excuse: It's too busy printing national security secrets that will get Americans killed. Its pages are already brimming with classified information about our techniques for spying on terrorists here in America — no room for newsworthy cartoons! The Pentagon Papers and a top-secret surveillance program are one thing; cartoons that irritate Muslims are quite another.

Taking to heart the lesson that violence works, I hereby announce to the world: I am offended by hotel windows that don't open, pilots chattering when the passengers are trying to sleep, and Garfield cartoons. Next time my sleep is disturbed by gibberish about our altitude over Kansas, the National Pilots Emirate embassy is going down. And mark my words: One minute after "Garfield II" goes into pre-production, some heads are gonna roll. Oh — and I'll take the San Diego port, please.

It is nice to see that conservatives can have discussions about issues. Even though people like Jim and Ron constantly say that we all simply listen to Rush and Sean (which means they don't listen to them)....there are many issues we have discussed...Miers, border security, spending, abortion, ect...and now this.

I was trying to think of something that liberals have argumentsnts about, and the only thing I could come up with was how loud and often to say they hate GWB. Some liberals want to yell only a few times a day, while others want to yell on the hour....I think that is the only issue there is big discussion on.

It is ironic that the Right has debates on things....since it is the Left that says we only read talking points and say whatever Bush says....

Well, here is another example to prove you guys wrong....in five minutes after they read this they will have forgotten yet another fact to prove them wrong...and the next time something comes up they will once again go back to their 1972 playbook and say we always support the president because we are dumb stupid redneck Republicans.

It takes a refined, intellectual giant on the Left to conjure up thoughts of genius...funny how they all think the same thing?