I wonder why?
What is she hiding?
They had to hide all of Bills rapes before he became President.
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
Clinton's first lady records locked up
Posted by The Game at 9:20 AM
Labels: Clinton, liberal lies
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
23 comments:
You mean like the shrub's threesomes with Rove and Jeff Gannon?
How many "overnights" did ol' Jeffy log in, again?
Am I the only one who wonders who was the cheerleader, and who was the quarterback?
And then there was the endless parade of Republican child molesters and assorted perverts...
When the Rethugs selected Bush in 2000, they promised "family values"...
They just forgot to mention they meant the Manson Family.
Bill's rapes....uh huh. As believable and verified as the Clinton murders.....
Learn a new trick Game.
As usual, the Kool-Aid drinking Libs can't admit there is something the Clinton Crime Family is hiding. How do you like being stolen from, hashie.
Again, what is Hillary hiding? Maybe the same stuff she didn't want her Secret Service detail to see, CRIMES she was committing or planning to commit.
Fudgie, I'd like to remind you that you STILL need to pay back America what you have stolen from her.
Back to the topic at hand....
IT'S.ALL.JOHN.LENNON'S.FAULT!!
Andy, if you were truthful to yourself, you would have to look at the initiatives of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and Mao and compare it to the Lib agenda. Now how many differences are there?
PCD- Try reading the blog. I've called out Hash quite a few times when he's gone overboard. For those capable of independent thought (clearly not you), our opinions aren't one and the same simply because we may have voted for the same canddiate in the past.
Game will probably say this doesn't addres his point at all, but what the hey:
Texas has one of the nation's strongest public information laws. But Governor Bush wanted to keep his papers secret anyway. Accordingly, in 1997, he sought and obtained a change in Texas law to help him do so.
The new law allows the governor to select a site for his papers other than the Texas State Library -- as long as it is in Texas. But the governor must first consult with the state's library and archives commission to make certain any alternative arrangement satisfied the state's open access law.
When Bush became president-elect, however, he simply sent his papers and records with no consultation whatsoever to his father's presidential library at Texas A&M University -- known as the most secretive of all the existing presidential libraries.
The result was, in effect, to federalize the papers and records, placing them in a legal limbo where no one could have access. Bush Senior's presidential library is run by the Federal Government -- specifically, the National Archives And Records Administration (NARA).
But Peggy Rudd, Director and Librarian of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission, refused to accept Bush's designation of his father's library as the repository for his papers. Eventually, she procured a ruling by the Texas attorney general, making Bush's gubernatorial papers subject to the Texas Public Information Act -- whereupon they were sent to Austin for processing.
Soon, however, Texas Governor Perry -- Bush's friend and hand-picked successor -- and the new attorney general found new exceptions in the state's information law that they claim give them the keys to the relevant filing cabinets. Good luck to those seeking access.
"our opinions aren't one and the same simply because we may have voted for the same canddiate in the past."
Correctimundo, Andy.
How typical of you, fudgePacker City Dan, to use the same divisive tactics and language to attempt to drive Americans apart, in order to deflect from your role in what has been done to destroy the fabric of American society and the very values this democracy was built upon.
Perhaps you can beg your high priestess Hugh Hewitt for absolution for all the brainwashed Marines that his Judeo- Christianist evangelical kinfolk proselytised to while in service, and died, never knowing from the "friendly fire" that hit them.
Shame, shame. Everyone knows PCD's name.
BLAME DAVID ORECK!!
"you would have to look at the initiatives of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and Mao and compare it to the Lib agenda."
Congrats, fudgie.
The STUPIDEST post, ever seen on game's blog.
Jay, it does address my post...IF I was talking about GW. We are talking about Clinton, and someone should go to Hash's mom's basement and make sure he is okay. Man are you a waste of time. You say nothing important, you are nothing.
"Waaaaaaaaah!"
"Give the baby his bottle, dear..."
And some of you want to argue liberals DON'T have a mental disorder?
Hash is a perfect case study.
Are you reading this stuff?
Hash is going to end up being Chet II...make comments based on the posts, not on neocon this, and GWB is evil that...focus, take your pills, or don't post...your getting way too annoying now.
Game, post a story worthwhile w/o juvenile innuendo such as "the Clinton Crime family" and you may wind up with substantive debate. You look like a damn fool posting that dream as if it were fact yet having the nerve to complain.
The reality is there is little, if anything, in your post to drive substantive comments.
A correction- Game did not use "Clinton Crime family." He used "Clinton rapes." No substantive difference in my opinion.
Well, Clinton was accused of rape by many women...but they were all lying, right?
Bush crime family...I know DailyKos readers think that is perfectly true, but you run into the problem of facts. I know you have your fake documents and your made up accusations that Bush lied to go to war (even though every other person in the world believed the same intelligence). So once again, I say something based on something that actually happened...you simply make up some silly thing you read at a wingbat lefty site.
Did they press charges? Was President Clinton convicted? Didn't think so.
You believe what you choose to believe, game.
Facts never enter into the equation.
Just more revisionist history...
"Was President Clinton convicted?"
Only in the court of right-wing public opinion and regressive talk radio, which bears no resemblance to reality anyway.
They only liked Clinton, when Clinton did "pro-business" things...like extend most favored trading nation status to China.
But what does the neocon care about the American child, once it is born? They could care less if they poison them in their cribs with their "free trade" Chinese imports, or kill 'em off on the battlefield, in their thirty-year wars for other nations interests and stockholders.
Conservatives LIKE it when regular Americans die for their interests. This is PATRIOTIC....
They hate us for our freedom, you know.
BLAME ANDREW SULLIVAN!
hash forgot to show the facts of the "bush crime family" and he also forgot to explain how ONLY Bush lied about the intel going to war with Iraq, while everyone else who said the exact same things he said (Kerry, Clinton, eveyone else) was NOT lying. Go to DailyKos and find an answer.
"Bush lied about the intel going to war with Iraq, while everyone else who said the exact same things he said (Kerry, Clinton, eveyone else) was NOT lying."
The key difference is that the Democrats were lied TO, whereas Bush sought deliberately to deceive the entire nation.
Show proof...prove that he knew for a fact that there were no significant WMD's...and don't show me one report for one guy that suggests it. The President gets TONS of intel every day...and if most of it said they had WMD's, and every intelligence agency in the world agreed...that doesn't make it a lie.
See, you can't just SAY things and hope they are true just because they sound good or lots of people at DailyKos say them.
Game,
The Libs here can't admit that when it was a Democrat in the White House and his Democrat Senators saying things back in the late 1990s, they were lied to. When Bush used the same intel, it was Bush lying.
It shows how dishonest each and every one of them, especially hash are.
Game, we've been over this countless times. Intelligence all over the world believed that Saddam had WMDs.
But they all also knew that there were very real reasons to challenge that belief. The difference is that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney said, "There is no doubt..." That's a lie. There was doubt and they knew there was doubt. They were lying. They did not present the doubts along with the evidence.
They lied.
Post a Comment