Of course you could say McCain has ads that stretch the trouth...but BHO is better than that!!!!
He is for CHANGE!!!
The fact is he is a tired old hard core liberal politician...same as all the rest of them...NO CHANGE WHATSOEVER...
First some lies about Palin from liberal bloggers:
Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn’t cut it at all. In fact, she increased funding and signed a bill that will triple per-pupil funding over three years for special needs students with high-cost requirements.
She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a "What if?" question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin's first term.
She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. She’s been registered as a Republican since May 1982.
Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a "courtesy" when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.
Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska's schools. She has said that students should be allowed to "debate both sides" of the evolution question, but she also said creationism "doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."
A new Obama-Biden ad includes misleading claims about McCain and education spending:
It says McCain "voted to cut education funding" and lists five votes. But one was a vote for increased education funding, although for fewer dollars than what Democrats may have wanted. And three others were votes against additional funding, not votes for funding cuts.
Warning...that is a trick of the left...they say you are cutting something when you vote to not raise it as much as they want...
The ad says that "McCain's economic plan gives $200 billion more to special interests while taking money away from public schools." Not exactly. McCain has proposed a one-year freeze on discretionary spending in general. A freeze would mean that funds would not keep pace with inflation and population growth, but no dollars would be "taken away." The $200 billion for "special interests" refers to the cost of McCain's proposal to reduce the tax rate for all business corporations, not just a few "special" ones.
The ad says McCain proposed abolishing the Department of Education. He did once say in an interview that he "would certainly favor" abolishing both the departments of Education and Energy, but he hasn't pushed for either.
Biden proved once again that it doesn't take outright falsehoods to create a skewed impression of one's opponent. We found in a Sept. 15 speech that:
Biden used partial quotes to support his charge that McCain wouldn't help "small borrowers" suffering in the mortgage crisis but would "fight for those that lost their ... real estate investments." In fact, McCain's full quote said he would also fight for those who "lost their jobs" and "savings," and he has proposed assistance for homeowners. Biden should be ashamed of himself for doing something like that.
He said McCain called Sen. Webb's GI Bill proposal "too generous." McCain never used those words. He did support a less-costly version of the bill.
Biden repeated several other talking points that we've previously critiqued for their spin, including the accusation that McCain would give $4 billion a year in tax cuts to oil companies.
Obama's lying ad about McCain and friends:
He tries to say Rush Limbaugh called Mexicans stupid. Now, how can someone with a soul make an add like this unless they are so incompetent they don't know the ad is a complete lie.
Limbaugh says the ad takes his words out of context, and that he did not call all Mexicans "stupid." In an opinion article in the Sept. 19 Wall Street Journal, he calls the ad's sound bites "a deception." He says the "stupid" quote comes from "a 1993 humorous monologue poking fun at the arguments against the North American Free Trade Agreement."The actual words, according Limbaugh, are these:
Limbaugh, 1993: If you are unskilled and uneducated, your job is going south. Skilled workers, educated people are going to do fine 'cause those are the kinds of jobs Nafta is going to create. If we are going to start rewarding no skills and stupid people, I'm serious, let the unskilled jobs that take absolutely no knowledge whatsoever to do -- let stupid and unskilled Mexicans do that work.We'll leave it to readers to judge how humorous that might or might not be. But those words do fall short of calling all Mexicans "stupid and unskilled" as the ad says. Limbaugh says his point "which is obvious, was that the people who were criticizing Nafta [sic] were demeaning workers, particularly low-skilled workers."
and the final lie of the month so far:
A new Obama ad characterizes the "Bush-McCain privatization plan" as "cutting Social Security Benefits in half." This is a falsehood sure to frighten seniors who rely on their Social Security checks. In truth, McCain does not propose to cut those checks at all.
This doesn't really look like change at all. He is following the far left liberal playbook to a tee. Say Republicans want to cut everything even when they don't, scare old people, minorities and poor people...
We do need a CHANGE...Obama is far from it.
12 comments:
"We do need a CHANGE...Obama is far from it" - Blogger writes.
Change from what? Change from current administration/ President/ ruling party? This is what bothers me - this blogger is talking as if it was some non-republican president who was in White House since 2000! First six years, it was republicans who were majority in senate.
To be fair, I can't pick on this blogger alone. Entire republican base, loyal to their party, is repeating these talking points. This is unbelievable! Do you understand that McCain is running under the same Republican banner? In fact, he diluted his stand and credibility by choosing a character like Palin!
As much as I support McCain, the real tragedy is that he is running after two terms of Bush/Republican Party. As we all know, there was hardly any support for McCain from Republican base. And, it's really difficult to make a case for 'change' when you are surrounded by the same folks!!
"In fact, she increased funding and signed a bill that will triple per-pupil funding over three years for special needs students with high-cost requirements."
This isn't something to be proud of.
I'm sick of big government Republicans. George Bush has done more harm to the conservative movement than the socialists could ever have dreamed of. Bush deserves the blame for the current financial crisis-- and McCain isn't an agent of change; all McCain does is compromise with morons like Feingold and Kennedy.
Granted, there are differences between the hero and the zero-- McCain is for free trade, McCain at least pretends for the moment to be for cutting taxes-- but I get the feeling McCain-Palin will pass any ounce of socialist slop that comes their way.
This really sucks. I'm a grumpy conservative right now!
As to Rush's comments on Mexicans - Well, I won't speculate on what he really meant. Probably he didn't call Mexicans 'stupid people'. It's one of those poor choice of words.
However, his assertion that only "stupid and unskilled" workers will loose their job shows how stupid Rush is/was. Outsourcing is NOT about sending only 'unskilled' jobs overseas. It's all about 'costs'. I don't think party loyalists like him can understand this!
If you have doubts, give a visit to any big corporations in Milwaukee downtown and see how many IT jobs have been sent offshore. Trust me - all those jobs make above 80K/year. Far from "stupid and unskilled" workers, uh?
"Warning...that is a trick of the left...they say you are cutting something when you vote to not raise it as much as they want..."
get serious. the righties, most often sean hannity, used the exact same tactics against kerry when they claimed that kerry voted to cut defense spending 350 times.
"She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party". true and i don't think anyone claims she was. but her husband was registered to the aip in october 1995 through july 2002, and she spoke at their convention.
anon...I just quoted a fact and your response is "get serious"
All I can do is show the truth and you can just say bla bla bla...
This is a tactic used in EVERY SINGLE elction...ONLY by the left
excuse me!? "Warning...that is a trick of the left...they say you are cutting something when you vote to not raise it as much as they want..."
this is not a fact and i have demonstrated that the left is NOT the only side that uses it.
"ONLY by the left". it is to laugh.
Anon says:
”this is not a fact and i have demonstrated that the left is NOT the only side that uses it.”
You’re contradicting yourself, not for the first time.
i didn't contradict myself at all, game claims that that it is a fact that only the left uses this tactic. it is demonstrably false and i have demonstrated that it is false.
your comment about Kerry is not the same tactic
it most certainly was.
"This is a tactic used in EVERY SINGLE elction...ONLY by the left..."
ridiculous, you've simply made a second career out of ignoring and hiding the crimes on your own side of the fence
when do conservatives say that DEMS are cutting spending when they are only agreeing to raise spending less than conservatives...doesn't happen...EVER
Post a Comment